In this study, we investigate four attitudinal structures (including liberal, conservative, and libertarian configurations) associated with two ideological dimensions among American voters and demonstrate that these attitudinal structures are related in expected ways to differential preferences for the values of freedom, order, and equality/caring. Liberals are inclined to trade freedom for equality/caring but not for order, whereas conservatives are their opposites—willing to trade freedom for order but not for equality/caring. In contrast, libertarians are generally less willing than others to trade freedom for either order or equality/caring (although they probably prefer order to equality/caring). The fourth ideological type is more willing than the others to relinquish freedom, preferring both order and equality/caring. Depending on how our results are interpreted, this fourth type may be characterized as either communitarian or humanitarian. These findings help close the gap between unidimensional conceptions and multidimensional evidence of ideological organization in political attitudes by demonstrating that value structure and attitudinal structure are strongly related in two ideological dimensions.
Achen, C.H. ( 2004, November). Let’s put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Presented at the annual meeting of the Peace Science Society, Rice University, Houston, TX.
2.
Alvarez, R.M., & Brehm, J. ( 2002). Hard choices, easy answers: Values, information, and American public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. ( 2005). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (3rd ed.). Lenexa, KS: Author.
4.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. ( 2006). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (4th ed.). Lenexa, KS: Author.
5.
Boaz, D., & Kirby, D. ( 2006). The libertarian vote. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, 580, 1-26. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa580.pdf
6.
Boyle, R.P., & Coughlin, R.M. (1994). Conceptualizing and operationalizing cultural theory. In D. J. Coyle & R. J. Ellis (Eds.), Politics, policy & culture (pp. 191-218). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7.
Chai, S., & Wildavsky, A. ( 1998). Cultural change, party ideology, and electoral outcomes . In S. Chai & B. Swedlow (Eds.), Culture and social theory (pp. 299-315). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
8.
Chong, D., McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. ( 1983). Patterns of support for democratic and capitalist values in the United States. British Journal of Political Science , 13, 401-440.
9.
Coyle, D.J. ( 1994). "This land is my land, this land is your land": Cultural conflict in environmental and land use regulation. In D. J. Coyle & R. J. Ellis (Eds.), Politics, policy & culture (pp. 191-218). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
10.
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S.H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries . Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420-445.
11.
Ellis, R.J., & Thompson, F. ( 1997). Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest . American Political Science Review, 91, 885-897.
12.
Feldman, S. ( 1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
13.
Feldman, S. ( 2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes . In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477-508). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
Feldman, S., & Steenbergen, M.R. (2001). The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 658-677.
15.
Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. ( 1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science , 36, 268-307.
16.
Feltus, W., Castellanos, A., & Devine, D. ( 2004). Survey research. In F. L. Smith, Jr. & A. Castellanos (Eds.), Field guide for effective communication (pp. 31-46). Washington, DC : Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Media .
17.
Goren, P. ( 2005). Party identification and core political values . American Journal of Political Science, 49, 881-896.
18.
Groves, R.M. ( 2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys . Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.
19.
Jacoby, W.G. ( 2002). Core values and political attitudes. In B. G. Norrander & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 177-201). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
20.
Jacoby, W.G. ( 2006a). Value choices and American public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 706-723.
21.
Jacoby, W.G. ( 2006b). Testing for hierarchical structure and priming effects among individual value choices. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
Jacoby, W.G., & Sniderman, P.M. (2006). The structure of value choices in the American public. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
23.
Janda, K., Berry, J.M., & Goldman, J. ( 2002). The challenge of democracy (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
24.
Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. ( 2006). Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly , 70, 759-779.
25.
Knight, K. ( 1984). The dimensionality of partisan and ideological affect: The influence of positivity. American Politics Quarterly , 12, 305-334.
26.
Knight, K. ( 1999). Liberalism and conservatism. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 681-736). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Knight, K. ( 2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. American Political Science Review, 100, 619-626.
28.
Layman, G.C., & Carsey, T.M. ( 2002). Party polarization and "conflict extension" in theAmerican electorate. American Journal of Political Science , 46, 786-802.
29.
Lockhart, C., & Coughlin, R.M. (1998). Grid-group theory and political ideology: A consideration of their relative strengths and weaknesses for explaining the structure of mass belief systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10, 33-58.
30.
Maddox, W.S., & Lilie, S.A. ( 1984). Beyond liberal and conservative: Reassessing the political spectrum. Washington, DC: Cato Institute .
31.
Marris, C., Langford, I.H., & O’Riordan, T. (1998). A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis, 18, 635-647.
32.
McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. ( 1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Miller, A.H., Miller, W.E., Raine, A.S., & Brown, T.A. ( 1976). A majority party in disarray: Policy polarization in the 1972 election. American Political Science Review, 70, 753-778.
34.
Miller, G., & Schofield, N. ( 2003). Activists and partisan realignment in the United States . American Political Science Review, 97, 245-260.
35.
Miller, G., & Schofield, N. ( 2008). The transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party coalitions in the U.S. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 433-450.
36.
Peters, E., & Slovic, P. ( 1996). The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1427-1453.
37.
Poole, K.T., & Rosenthal, H. ( 1984). U.S. presidential elections 1968-1980: A spatial analysis . American Journal of Political Science, 28, 283-312.
38.
Poole, K.T., & Rosenthal, H. ( 2007). Ideology & Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
39.
Rokeach, M. ( 1973). The nature of human values. New York : Free Press.
40.
Schofield, N., & Miller, G. ( 2007). Elections and activist coalitions in the United States . American Journal of Political Science, 51, 518-531.
41.
Schofield, N., Miller, G., & Martin, A. ( 2003). Critical elections and political realignments in the U.S.: 1860-2000. Political Studies, 51, 217-240.
42.
Schwartz, S. ( 1992). Universals in the content and structure of values . In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Smith, F. L., Jr., & Castellanos, A. (Eds.). (2004). Field guide for effective communication. Washington, DC: Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Media.
44.
Swedlow, B. ( 2008). Beyond liberal and conservative: Two dimensional conceptions of ideol-1ogy and the structure of political attitudes and values . Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 157-180.
45.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. ( 1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
46.
Wildavsky, A. ( 1998). Culture and social theory (S. Chai & B. Swedlow, Eds.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers .
47.
Wildavsky, A. ( 2006). Cultural analysis: Politics, public law, and administration (B. Swedlow, Ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
48.
Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. ( 1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why?Daedalus, 119, 41-60. (Reprinted in The rise of radical egalitarianism, by A. Wildavsky, 1991. Washington, DC: American University Press)
