We seek to extend discourse on“the reconstructive presidency” to the edge of new frontiers in two interrelated ways. First, we argue that reconstructive presidents act within critical junctures in which they exploit periodic opportunities to revitalize enervated political regimes, but that failure to exploit such opportunities can also occur. Second, we clarify the tasks necessary for reconstructive success, contending that reconstructive presidents must (a) shift the main axis of partisan cleavage, (b) assemble a new majority coalition, and (c) institutionalize a new political regime.Through conducting typical and crucial case studies, we show how reconstructive dynamics unfold in either a straightforward or protracted manner depending on whether presidents initially handed reconstructive opportunities, via encountering enervated political conditions, succeed in accomplishing the tasks we delineate. In doing so, we depart from previous interpretations and recast the “System of 1896” as a successful reconstruction.
Aldrich, J.H., & Niemi, R.G. ( 1996). The sixth American party system: Electoral change, 1952-1992 . In S. C. Craig (Ed.), Broken contract: Changing relationships between Americans and their government (pp. 87-109), Boulder, CO: West-view Press.
2.
Antieau, C.J. ( 1981). The original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment . Warrensburg, MO: Mid-America Press .
3.
Arnold, P.E. ( 1995). Determinism and contingency in Skowronek’s political time. Polity, 37, 497-508.
4.
Axelrod, R. ( 1972). Where the votes come from: An analysis of electoral coalitions, 1952-1968. American Political Science Review, 66(March), 11-20.
5.
Bensel, R.F. ( 2000). The political economy of American industrialization, 1877-1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Brady, D., & Stewart, J., Jr. (1982). Congressional party realignment and transformations of public policy in three realignment eras. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 333-360.
7.
Brady, H.E., & Collier, D. ( 2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards . New York: Rowman & Littlefield .
8.
Brown, R.H. ( 1966). The Missouri crisis, slavery, and the politics of Jacksonianism . South Atlantic Quarterly, 65, 55-72.
9.
Burnham, W.D. ( 1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics . New York: W. W. Norton .
10.
Burnham, W.D. ( 1999). Constitutional moments and punctuated equilibria: A political scientist confronts Bruce Ackerman’s We the People. Yale Law Journal, 108, 2237-2277.
11.
Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R.D. ( 2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics , 59, 341-369.
12.
Carmines, E.G., & Stimson, J. ( 1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Carpenter, D.P. ( 2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
14.
Clayton, C., & May, D.A. ( 1999). A political regimes approach to the analysis of legal decisions. Polity, 32, 233-252.
15.
Collier, R.B., & Collier, D. ( 1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Cook, D.M., & Polsky, A.J. ( 2005). Political time reconsidered: Unbuilding and rebuilding the state under the Reagan administration. American Politics Research, 33, 577-605.
17.
Crockett, D.A. ( 2002). The opposition presidency: Leadership and the constrains of history. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
18.
Crockett, D.A. ( 2008). Running against the grain: How opposition presidents win the White House. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
19.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S.J. ( 1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism . In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp. 82-115), San Francisco :: Freeman, Cooper, and Company.
20.
Gerring, J. ( 2001). Social science methodology: A critical framework . New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Gerring, J. ( 2003). APD from a methodological point of view. Studies in American political development, 17, 82-102.
22.
Goertz, G. ( 2006). Social science concepts: A users’ guide . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Gould, L.L. ( 1991). The presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
24.
Hall, P.A. & Taylor, R.C.R. ( 1996). Political Science and the three new institutionalisms . Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
25.
Hamilton, A. ( 1961) Federalist #70. In C. Rossiter (Ed.), The Federalist papers (pp. 423-431). New York: Penguin.
26.
Harris, D.B. ( 1997). Dwight Eisenhower and the New Deal: The politics of preemption . Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27, 333.
27.
Hoekstra, D.J. ( 1999). The politics of politics: Skowronek and presidential research. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29, 657-671.
28.
Hollingsworth, J.R. ( 1963). The whirligig of politics: The democracy of Cleveland and Bryan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
James, S.C. ( 2000). Presidents, parties, and the state: A party system perspective on democratic regulatory choice, 1884-1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Key, V.O., Jr, (1955). A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics, 17, 3-18.
31.
Kingdon, J.W. ( 1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Addison, Wesley, Longman.
32.
Kleppner, P. ( 1970). The cross of culture: A social analysis of Midwestern politics, 1850-1900. New York: Free Press.
33.
Katznelson, I. ( 2003). Periodization and preferences: Reflections on purposive action in comparative historical social science. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschmeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 208-240), New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Knoles, G.H. ( 1942). The presidential campaign and election of 1892 . New York: AMS Press.
35.
Ladd, E.C., Jr., , & Hadley, C.D. (1973). Political parties and political issues: Patterns in differentiation since the New Deal. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Lieberman, R.C. ( 2000). Political time and policy coalitions: Structure and agency in presidential power. In R. Y. Shapiro, M. J. Kumar, & L. R. Jacobs (Eds.), Presidential power: Forging the presidency for the twenty-first century (pp. 274-310). New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. ( 1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments . In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party system and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1-64). New York: Free Press.
38.
Magliocca, G.N. ( 2007). Andrew Jackson and the Constitution: The rise and fall of generational regimes. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
39.
Magliocca, G.N. ( 2009). George W. Bush in political time: The Janus presidency . Law and Social Inquiry, 34, 473-493.
40.
Mahoney, J. ( 2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507-548.
41.
Mayhew, D.R. ( 2002). Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
McCormick, R.P. ( 1966). The second American party system: Party transformation in the Jacksonian era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
43.
McSeveney, S.T. ( 1972). The politics of depression: Political behavior in the north-east, 1893-1896. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Mellow, N., & Tulis, J.K. ( 2007). Andrew Johnson and the politics of failure. In S. Skowronke & M. Glassman (Eds.), Formative acts: American politics in the making (pp. 153-170). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
45.
Miller, G., & Schofield, N. ( 2008). The transformation of the Republican and Democratic party coalitions in the U.S. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 433-450.
46.
Milkis, S.M. ( 1995). What politics do presidents make? Polity , 37, 485-496.
47.
Nardulli, P. ( 1995). The concept of a critical realignment, electoral behavior, and political change. American Political Science Review, 58, 10-22.
48.
Neustadt, R.E. ( 1960). Presidential power, the politics of leadership . New York: Wiley.
49.
Nichols, C. ( 2009a). The governing cycle and the dynamics of new majority formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
50.
Nichols, C. ( 2009b). Reconsidering realignment from a systemic perspective . Clio: The Newsletter of the Politics and History Section , 19(2), 3, 50-53.
51.
Nichols, C., & Franklin, D. ( 2004). Challenge and response: Skowronek’s regime theory revisited. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
52.
North, D.C. ( 1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance . New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. ( 1998). Regimes and regime building in American government: A review of the literature on the 1940s. Political Science Quarterly , 113, 689-702.
54.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. ( 2004). The search for American political development . New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Petrocik, J.R. ( 1981). Party coalitions: Realignments and the decline of the New Deal party system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Phillips, K. ( 2003). William McKinley. New York : Macmillan.
57.
Pierson, P. ( 2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-267.
58.
Pierson, P. ( 2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
Plotke, D. ( 1996). Building a democratic political order: Reshaping American liberalism in the 1930s and 1940s. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Polsky, A. ( 1997). The 1996 elections and the logic of regime politics . Polity, 30, 153-166.
61.
Polsky, A. ( 2002, November). A theory of partisan regimes. Paper presented at the Philadelphia American Politics Research Seminar, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
62.
Polsky, A. ( 2003). The political economy of partisan regimes: Lessons from two Republican eras. Polity, 35, 595-612.
63.
Polsky, A. ( 2009, September). Partisan regimes in American politics . Paper presented at the conference of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
64.
Remini, R. ( 1981). Andrew Jackson and the course of American freedom, 1822-1832: Volume II. New York: Harper & Row.
Riley, R.L. ( 2000). The limits of the transformational presidency . In R. Y. Shapiro, M. J. Kumar, & L. R. Jacobs (Eds.), Presidential power: Forging the presidency for the twenty-first century (pp. 435-458). New York: Columbia University Press.
67.
Rolater, F. ( 1993). The American Indian and the origins of the second party system. Wisconsin Magazine of History, 76, 180-203.
68.
Russo, D.J. ( 1972). The major political issues of the Jacksonian period and the development of party loyalty in Congress, 1830-1840. Transaction of the American Philosophical Society, 62, 3-51.
69.
Shafer, B. E. (Ed.). (1991). The end of realignment? Interpreting American electoral eras. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
70.
Shattschneider, E.E. ( 1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
71.
Schickler, E. ( 2001). Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
72.
Skowronek, S. ( 1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. New York : Cambridge University Press.
73.
Skowronek, S. ( 1986). Notes on the Presidency in the Political Order . Studies in American Political Development, 1, 286-302.
74.
Skowronek, S. ( 1993). The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
Skowronek, S. ( 2003) Presidential leadership in political time. In M. Neslon (Ed.), The Presidency and the political system (7th ed., pp. 111-157). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
76.
Skowronek, S. ( 2008). Presidential leadership in political time: Reprise and reappraisal. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
77.
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (Eds.). (1992 ). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. ( 2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1-39). New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
Sundquist, J.L. ( 1983). Dynamics of the party system: Alignment and realignment of political parties in the United States (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
80.
Thelen, K. ( 2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschmeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 208-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
Tulis, J.K. ( 1987). The rhetorical presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
Valelly, R.M. ( 2004). The two reconstructions: The struggle for Black enfranchisement . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
Welch, R.E. ( 1988). The presidencies of Grover Cleveland. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas .
84.
Whittington, K. ( 2001). Presidential challenges to judicial supremacy and the politics of constitutional meaning. Polity, 33, 365-395.
85.
Williams, R.H. ( 1978). Years of decision: American politics in the 1890s. Prospect Point, ILWaveland Press.
