This article historicizes the archive as a mechanism of exclusion. It focuses on three archival sites (the development of archival rationalization in the 19th century, national archives and the collecting of government documents, and the discipline of history) to analyze their shared logics of classification, identity, evidence, and authenticity. These three sites are connected through the author’s attempts to research and write a history of the passport within cultural studies. The archive, therefore, provides a site from which to clarify what is at stake in the claims of cultural studies to be an interdisciplinary project.
Ballantyne, T. (2001). Archive, discipline, state: Power and knowledge in South Asian historiography. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 3(2), 87-105.
2.
Bradsher, J. G. (1985). The National Archives: Serving government, the public and scholarship, 1950-1965. In T. Walch(Ed.), Guardian of heritage: Essays on the history of the National Archives (pp. 51-64). Washington, DC: National Archives and Record Administration.
3.
Burton, A. (1997). Who needs the nation? Interrogating ‘British’ history. Journal of Historical Sociology, 10(3), 227-248.
4.
Burton, A. (2003). Dwelling in the archive: Women writing house, home and history in late colonial India. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Calavita, K. (2001). The paradoxes of race, class, identity and “passing”: Enforcing the Chinese Exclusion Acts, 1882-1910. Law and Social Inquiry, 25(1), 1-40.
6.
Daston, L. , & Gallison, P. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations, 40, 81-128.
7.
Derrida, J. (1996). Archive fever. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Grossberg, L. (1997). Bringing it all back home. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
Gustafson, M. (1970). State Department records in the National Archives: A profile. Prologue, 2(3), 175-184.
10.
History of the Human Sciences. (1998). 11(4), 1-120.
11.
History of the Human Sciences. (1999). 12(2), 1-122.
12.
Johnson, R. (2001). Historical returns: Trans disciplinarity, cultural studies and history. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(3), 261-288.
13.
Lee, E. (2003). At America’s gates: Chinese immigration during the Exclusion Era, 1882-1943. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
14.
Matsuda, M. (1996). The memory of the modern. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
McCoy, D. (1978). The National Archives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
16.
McCoy, D. (1985). The struggle to establish a national archives in the United States. In T. Walch(Ed.), Guardian of heritage: Essays on the history of the National Archives (pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: National Archives and Record Administration.
17.
Miller, P. (1990). On the inter-relation between accounting and the state. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 315-338.
18.
Mnookin, J. (in press). Scripting expertise: The history of handwriting identification evidence and the judicial construction of reliability. Virginia Law Review.
19.
Morris, M. (1998). Too soon too late: History in popular culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
Osborne, T. (1999). The ordinariness of the archive. History of the Human Sciences, 12(3), 51-64.
21.
Packer, J. (2003). Mapping the intersections of Foucault and cultural studies: An interview with Lawrence Grossberg and Toby Miller. In J. Bratich, J. Packer, & C. McCarthy(Eds.), Foucault, cultural studies and governing (pp. 23-46). Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
Purdy, V. (1985). A temple to Clio: The National Archives Building. In T. Walch(Ed.), Guardian of heritage: Essays on the history of the National Archives (pp. 17-32). Washington, DC: National Archives and Record Administration.
23.
Reingold, N. (1979). Clio’s handmaidens uncovered?Reviews in American History, 7, 418-426.
24.
Sankar, P. (1992). State power and record-keeping: The history of individualized surveillance in the United States, 1790-1935. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
25.
Sekula, A. (1986). The body and the archive. October, 39(3), 3-64.
26.
Smith, R. (1997). Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Spivak, G. (1985). The Rani of Sirmur: An essay in reading the archives. History and Theory, 24, 247-271.
28.
Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson& L. Grossberg(Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Steedman, C. (1992). Culture, cultural studies, and the historians. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler(Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 613-622). New York: Routledge.
30.
Steedman, C. (2001). Something she called a fever: Michelet, Derrida, and Dust. American Historical Review, 106, 1159-1180.
31.
Steedman, C. (2002). Dust: The archive and cultural history. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
32.
Torpey, J. (2000). The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship and the state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Unger, S. (1977). J. Edgar Hoover leaves the state department. Foreign Policy, 28,110-116.
34.
Voss, P. , & Werner, M. (1999). Towards a poetics of the archive [Special issue]. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 32(1), 1-190.
35.
Walch, T. (Ed.). (1985). Guardian of heritage: Essays on the history of the National Archives. Washington, DC: National Archives and Record Administration.
