This article is a creative reconstruction of reflexivity as it operates for some practitioners of the ethnography of communication. Our central concern is conceptualized as “discursive reflexivity”; with that concept, we foreground communication both as primary data and as our primary theoretical concern. As a result, we treat reflexivity as a process of metacommunication, that is, as a reflexive process of using discourse at one level to discuss discourse on another. Following current and past research, we explore how dimensions of discursive reflexivity differently configure into five types of ethnographic practice, these being theoretical, descriptive, interpretive, comparative, and critical inquiry. Each is discussed as analytically distinct from the others, yet all coalesce experientially or, in other words, all coexist in one’s experience as an ethnographer. Relationships are discussed between discursive reflexivity and self-reflexivity, including various modes of ethnographic reporting and future directions for inquiry.
Basso, K. ( 1970). To "give up on words": Silence in the Western Apache culture. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 26, 213-230.
2.
Bauman, R. ( 1970). Aspects of 17th century Quaker rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56, 67-74.
3.
Bauman, R. ( 1983). Let your words be few: Symbolism of speaking and silence among seventeenth century Quakers. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
4.
Baxter, L. ( 1993). "Talking things through" and "putting it in writing": Two codes of communication in an academic institution. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 313-326.
5.
Berry, M. ( 2009). The social and cultural realization of diversity: An interview with Donal Carbaugh. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9, 230-241.
6.
Bloch, L. ( 2003). Who’s afraid of being a friere? The analysis of communication through a key cultural frame. Communication Theory, 13, 125-159.
7.
Boromisza-Habashi, D. ( 2007). Freedom of expression, hate speech, and models of personhood in Hungarian political discourse. Communication Law Review , 7, 54-74.
8.
Braithwaite, C. ( 1990). Communicative silence: A cross-cultural study of Basso’s hypothesis. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Carbaugh, D. ( 1989). Fifty terms for talk: A cross-cultural study. International and Intercultural Communication Annual, 13, 93-120.
10.
Carbaugh, D. ( 1990). The critical voice in ethnography of communication research . Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23, 261-282.
11.
Carbaugh, D. ( 2005). Cultures in conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Carbaugh, D. ( 2007). Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 167-182.
13.
Carbaugh, D., Boromisza-Habashi, D., & Ge, X. ( 2006). Dialogue in cross-cultural perspective. In N. Aalto & E. Reuter (Eds.), Aspects of intercultural dialogue (pp. 27-46). Koln , Germany: SAXA Verlag.
14.
Carbaugh, D., & Buzzanell, P. ( 2010). Reflections on the distinctive qualities of communication research. In D. Carbaugh & P. Buzzanell (Eds.), Distinctive qualities in communication research (pp. 106-116). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
Carbaugh, D., Berry, M., & Nurmikari-Berry, M. (2006). Coding personhood through cultural terms and practices: Silence and quietude as a Finnish "Natural way of being."Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(3), 1-18.
16.
Carbaugh, D., & Hastings, S. ( 1992). A role for communication theory in ethnography and cultural analysis. Communication Theory, 2, 156-165.
17.
Carbaugh, D., & Poutiainen, S. (2000). By way of introduction: An American and Finnish dialogue. In M. Lustig & J. Koester (Eds.), Among US: Essays on identity, belonging, and intercultural competence (pp. 203-212). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
18.
Covarrubias, P.O. ( 2008). Masked silence sequences: Hearing discrimination in the college classroom. Communication, Culture, & Critique , 1, 227-252.
19.
Craig, R.T. ( 1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
20.
Fitch, K.L. ( 1994). The issue of selection of objects of analysis in ethnographies of speaking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(1), 51-93.
21.
Geertz, C. ( 1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Hervik, P. ( 1994). Shared reasoning in the field: Reflexivity beyond the author. In K. Hastrup & P. Hervik (Eds.), Social experience and anthropological knowledge (pp. 78-100). London, UK: Routledge .
23.
Hymes, D. ( 1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life . In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). New York, NY : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
24.
Katriel, T. ( 2004). Dialogic moments: From soul talks to talk radio in Israeli culture. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
25.
Kim, M.-S., & Ebesu Hubbard, A.S. (2007). Intercultural communication in the global village: How to understand "the Other."Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 223-235.
26.
Levine, T.R., Park, H.S., & Kim, R.K. ( 2007). Some conceptual and theoretical challenges for cross-cultural communication research in the 21st century. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 205-221.
27.
Milburn, T., Wilkins, R., & Wilkins, K.W. ( 2001). Reflexive moments: Negotiating researcher roles in participant observation. Iowa Journal of Communication, 33, 106-123.
28.
Philips, S.U. ( 1976). Some sources of culture variability in the regulation of talk. Language in Society, 5, 81-95.
29.
Philips, S.U. ( 1983). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian reservation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
30.
Philipsen, G. ( 1987). The prospect for cultural communication. In L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 245-254). New York, NY: Academic Press.
31.
Philipsen, G. ( 1992). Speaking culturally. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
Philipsen, G. ( 1997). A theory of speech codes. In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 119-156). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Philipsen, G. ( 2002). Cultural communication. In W. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 51-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
Philipsen, G. ( 2010). Researching culture in contexts of social interaction: An ethnographic approach, a network of scholars, illustrative moves. In D. Carbaugh & P. Buzzanell (Eds.), Distinctive qualities in communication research (pp. 87-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
Poutiainen, S., & Gerlander, M. ( 2009). Cultural dialectics in Finnish advising relationships . In R. Wilkins & P. Isotalus (Eds.), Speech culture in Finland (pp. 85-116). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
36.
Weider, L. and S. Pratt. ( 1990). On being a recognizable Indian among Indians. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact (pp. 45-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37.
Wilkins, R. ( 2005). The optimal form: Inadequacies and excessiveness within the Asiallinen [Matter of fact] nonverbal style in public and civic settings in Finland. Journal of Communication, 55, 383-401.
38.
Wilkins, R. ( 2009). The asiasta puhuminen event. In R. Wilkins & P. Isotalus (Eds.), Speech culture in Finland (pp. 63-84). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
