Federal legislation mandates that local education agencies provide quality, evidence-based supplemental educational services to struggling learners. Nowhere is this more salient than in underperforming schools serving children from low-income backgrounds who are at risk for developing learning problems. The study described in this article investigated the intervention validity of two measurement tasks from the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) on the acquisition of early literacy skills of 75 first graders from low-income backgrounds. Results indicate that the DIBELS measures effectively modeled expected student growth and informed instructional planning that ultimately led to increased student outcomes.
Adams, M.J., Foorman, B.R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T.D. (1997). Phonemic awareness in young children: A classroom curriculum. Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Bryk, A.S., Raudenbush, S.W., & Condon, R. (1996). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software.
3.
Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does Head Start make a difference? American Economic Review, 85, 341-364.
4.
Dickenson, D.K. (2001). Putting the pieces together: Impact of preschool on children's language and literacy development in kindergarten. In D. K. Dickenson & P. O. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school (pp. 257-288). Baltimore: Brookes.
5.
Dickenson, D. K., & Tabors, P. O. (Eds.). (2001). Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school. Baltimore: Brookes.
6.
Elliot, S.N., & Fuchs, L.S. (1997). The utility of curriculum-based measurement and performance assessment as alternatives to traditional intelligence and achievement tests. School Psychology Review, 26, 224-233.
7.
Engelmann, S., Carnine, D., Kelly, B., & Engelmann, O. (1996). Connecting math concepts, Level A. New York: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
8.
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disability construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157-171.
9.
Goldenberg, C. (1996). Schools, children at risk, and successful interventions . In A. Booth & J. Dunn (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes (pp. 115-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Goldhaber, D.D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2, 50-55.
11.
Good, R.H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 699-720). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
12.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326-336.
13.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E., Kaminski, R.A., & Wallin, J. (2002). Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Technical Report 11). Eugene: University of Oregon.
14.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
16.
Lee, V., & Loeb, S. (1995). Where do Head Start attendees end up? One reason why preschool effects fade out. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 62-82.
17.
Lupton, R. (2005). Social justice and school improvement: Improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighborhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 589-604.
18.
Marvin, C., & Mirenda, P. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers enrolled in Head Start and special education programs. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 351-367.
19.
McGill-Franzen, A., Lanford, C., & Adams, E. (2002). Learning to be literate: A comparison of five urban early childhood programs. Journal of Educational Psychology , 94, 443-464.
20.
McLoyd, V. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development . American Psychologist, 53, 296-318.
21.
Nam, C.B., & Terrie, E.W. (1993, August). Comparison of three occupational scales . Paper presented at the Intercongress Seminar of the International Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
22.
Neuman, S.B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low- and middle-income communities: An ecological study of 4 neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly , 36, 8-26.
23.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 4301 et seq. (2002).
24.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L.V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
25.
Roberts, J.E., Jurgens, J., & Burchinal, M. (2005). The role of home literacy practices in preschool children's language and emergent literacy skills. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 345-359.
26.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525-1567.
27.
Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E., Coyne, M., & Chard, D. (2006). Effective strategies for teaching beginning reading . In Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (pp. 45-70). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
28.
Snow, C.E., & Paez, M.M. (2004). The Head Start classroom as an oral language environment: What should the performance standards be? In E. Zigler & S. J. Styfco (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 113-128). Baltimore: Brookes.
29.
Storch, S.A., & Whitehurst, G.J. (2001). The role of family and home in the literacy development of children from low-income backgrounds. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 53-72.
30.
Tajalli, H., & Opheim, C. (2005). Strategies for closing the gap: Predicting student performance in economically disadvantaged schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 28, 44-54.
31.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2006). Review of progress monitoring tools. Retrieved July 29, 2007, from http://www.studentprogress.org/chart/chart.asp
