Factor Analytic Study of the WISC-R for Three Groups of Handicapped Students

Abstract

A principle component factor analysis with varimax rotation was performed for 252 subjects on 11 WISC-R variables. Three factors were specified for extraction. The subjects were divided into three diagnostic groups (educable mentally handicapped, slow learners, learning disabled) based on their WISC-R scores and individual placement committee decisions. The factors thus obtained for each diagnostic group corresponded to those found in the standardization group. The three factors were verbal-conceptual, perceptualspatial, and distractibility-short term memory. The findings suggested that the factor paradigm found for the three diagnostic groups can be used confidently to interpret scores from the WISC-R. These findings also indicated that the basic ability dimensions are the same for clinical samples as they are for subjects in the standardization sample.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blaha, J. , & Vance, H.B. (1979). The hierarchical factor structure of the WISC-R for learning disabled children. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 2, 71–75.

Carlson, L.C. , Reynolds, C.R. , & Gutkin, T.B. (1983). Consistency of the factorial validity of the WISC-R for upper and lower SES groups. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 319–326.

Dean, R.S. (1980). Factor structure of the WISC-R with Anglos and Mexican Americans. Journal of School Psychology, 18, 234–239.

Graff, M. , & Hubble, L.M. (1982). WISC-R factor structure of younger and older youth with low IQs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 148–149.

Johnson, W.T. , & Bolen, L.M. (1984). A comparison of the WISC-R for blacks and whites. Psychology in the schools, 21, 42–44.

Kaufman, A.S. (1975). Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 6 1/2 and 16 1/2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 136–147.

Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Reynolds, C.R. , & Gutkin, T.B. (1980). Stability of the WISC-R factor structure across sex at two age levels. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 775–777.

Sattler, J. (1988). The assessment of children (3rd Ed.). San Diego: Author.

10.

Snow, J.H. , Cohen, M. , & Holliman, W.B. (1985). Learning disability subgroups using cluster analysis of the WISC-R. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 3, 391–397.

11.

Vance, H.B. , & Wallbrown, F.H. (1977). Hierarchical factor structure for the WISC-R for referred children and adolescents. Psychological Reports, 41, 699–702.

12.

Vance, H.B. , & Wallbrown, F.H. (1978). The structure of intelligence for black children: A hierarchical approach. Psychological Record, 28, 31–34.

13.

Vance, H.B. , & Wallbrown, F.H. & Fremont, F.S. (1976). The abilities of retarded children: Further evidence concerning the stimulus trace factor. Journal of Psychology, 100, 77–82.

14.

Wechsler, D. (1974). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.