Number discernment is at the heart of task accuracy for laboratory animals performing Fixed Consecutive Number (FCN) operant tasks. Narrow-limit FCN tasks, in particular, are useful for measuring working memory in rat subjects because performance efficacy, which is set up to concord with food delivery, depends on a fairly precise quantification of cues generated by the rat's ongoing behavior. Reported here is a behavioral pharmacology study that utilized a group of overtrained and FCN-schedule-compliant rats injected in a randomized series of testing sessions with different types of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor modulating drugs. Modifications made to the narrowlimit FCN schedule permitted a simultaneous measure of druginduced compromises in subjects' sensory integrative or motor coordinating capabilities. This highly sensitive model implicated the intrachannel and the glutamate recognition NMDA receptor binding sites as prime mediators of NMDA antagonist associated memory impairments because drugs acting at the mentioned sites lowered counting efficacy without altering sensorimotor function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aultman, J. M., & Moghaddam, B. (2001). Distinct contributions of glutamate and dopamine receptors to temporal aspects of rodent working memory using a clinically relevant task. Psychopharmacology, 153(3), 353-364.
2.
Baddeley, A., et al. (2000). The brain decade in debate: I. Neurobiology of learning and memory. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 33(9), 993-1002.
3.
Baldwin, A. E., Sadeghian, K., & Kelley, A. E. (2002). Appetitive instrumental learning requires coincident activation of NMDA and dopamine D1 receptors within the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 22(3), 1063-1071.
4.
Balster, R. L. (1991). Drug abuse potential evaluation in animals. British Journal of Addiction, 86(12), 1549-1558.
5.
Bespalov, A. Y., Zvartau, E. E., & Beardsley, P. M. (2001). Opioid-NMDA receptor interactions may clarify conditioned (associative) components of opioid analgesic tolerance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(4), 343-353.
6.
Boysen, S., & Capaldi, E. J. (1993). The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Breland, K. B. M. (1968). Misbehavior of organisms. In A. C. Catania (Ed.), Contemporary research in operant behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
8.
Broadbent, H., Church, R. M., Meck, W. H., & Rakitin, B. C. (1993). Quantitative relationships between timing and counting. In S. C. Boysen & E. J. (Eds.), The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Bronson, M. E., & Moerschbaecher, J. M. (1987). Effects of mu, kappa and sigma opioids on fixed consecutive number responding in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 27(4), 733-743.
10.
Cain Vanderwolf, C. H. (1995). Testing the NMDA, long-term potentiation, and cholinergic hypotheses of spatial learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22(2), 181-193.
11.
Caramanos, Z., Shapiro, M. L., Wesierska, M., Macias-Gonzalez, R., & Bures, J. (1994). Spatial memory and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists APV and MK-801: Memory impairments depend on familiarity with the environment, drug dose, and training duration. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108(1), 30-43.
12.
Christoffersen, G. R., Christensen, L. H., Harrington, N. R., Macphail, E. M., & Riedel, G. (1999). Task-specific enhancement of short-term, but not long-term, memory by class I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist 1-aminoindan-1, 5-dicarboxylic acid in rats. Behavioral Brain Research, 101(2), 215-226.
13.
Ciccocioppo, R., Sanna, P. P., & Weiss, F. (2001). Cocaine-predictive stimulus induces drug-seeking behavior and neural activation in limbic brain regions after multiple months of abstinence: Reversal by D(1) antagonists. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(4), 1976-1981.
14.
Cole, B. J., Klewer, M., Jones, G. H., & Stephens, D. N. (1993). Contrasting effects of the competitive NMDA antagonist CPP and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK 801 on performance of an operant delayed matching to position task in rats. Psychopharmacology, 111(4), 465-471.
15.
Compte, A., Brunel, N., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Wang, X. J. (2000). Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cerebral Cortex, 10(9), 910-923.
16.
Davis, H., & Bradford, S. A. (1986). Counting behavior in rats in a simulated natural environment. Ethology, 73, 265-280.
17.
Davis, H., & Memmott, J. (1982). Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 547-571.
18.
Davis, H., & Perusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence and a new research agenda. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 561-579.
19.
Dawson, G. R., Heyes, C. M., & Iversen, S. D. (1992). Pharmacological mechanisms and animal models of cognition. Behavioral Pharmacology, 3(4), 285-297.
20.
Day, L. B., & Schallert, T. (1996). Anticholinergic effects on acquisition of place learning in the Morris water task: Spatial mapping deficit or inability to inhibit nonplace strategies? Behavioral Neuroscience, 110(5), 998-1005.
21.
D'Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (1999). The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 37(11), 1303-1315.
22.
Doty, P., Dysktra, L. A., & Picker, M. J. (1992). Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol interactions with phencyclidine and ethanol: Effects on accuracy and rate of responding. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 43(1), 61-70.
23.
Doyle, K. M., Feerick, S., & Kirkby, D. L. (1998). Comparison of various N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in a model of short-term memory and on overt behaviour. Behavioral Pharmacology, 9(8), 671-681.
24.
Dudchenko, P., & Sarter, M. (1992). Behavioral microanalysis of spatial delayed alternation performance: Rehearsal through overt behavior, and effects of scopolamine and chlordiazepoxide. Psychopharmacology, 107(2-3), 263-270.
25.
Dudkin, K. N., Kruchinin, V. K., & Chueva, I. V. (2001). Neurophysiological correlates of delayed visual differentiation tasks in monkeys: The effects of the site of intracortical blockade of NMDA receptors. Neurosci Behav Physiol, 31(2), 207-218.
26.
Dunnett, S. B. (1985). Comparative effects of cholinergic drugs and lesions of nucleus basalis or fimbria-fornix on delayed matching in rats. Psychopharmacology, 87(3), 357-363.
27.
Evenden, J. L. (1998). The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats II: The effects of amphetamine, haloperidol, imipramine, chlordiazepoxide and other drugs on fixed consecutive number schedules (FCN 8 and FCN 32). Psychopharmacology, 138(3-4), 283-294.
28.
Fetterman, J. G. (1996). Dimensions of stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22(1), 3-18.
29.
Fetterman, J. G., & Killeen, P. R. (1990). A componential analysis of pacemaker-counter timing systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 766-780.
30.
Filliat, P., & Blanchet, G. (1995). Effects of TCP on spatial memory: Comparison with MK-801. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 51(2-3), 429-434.
31.
Fuster, J. M. (2000). Cortical dynamics of memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35(2-3), 155-164.
32.
Fuster, J. M. (2003). Cortex and mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Galbicka, G., Kautz, M. A., & Jagers, T. (1994). Behavioral effects of enantiomers of dizocilpine under two “counting” procedures in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 49(4), 943-948.
34.
Galbicka, G., Ritchie, V., Ferguson, J., Didie, E. R., & Doan-Wellons, Q. (2001). Effects of advanced candidate anticonvulsants under two rodent models of “counting.” Journal of Applied Toxicology, 21(1), S109-S114.
35.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1-2), 43-74.
36.
Gerard, R. (1949). Physiology and psychiatry. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 161-173.
37.
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2002). The “psychic cell” of Ramon y Cajal. Progress in Brain Research, 136, 427-434.
38.
Grunberg, N. E., & Acri, J. B. (1991). Conceptual and methodological considerations for tobacco addiction research. British Journal of Addiction, 86(5), 637-641.
39.
Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. Glouster, MA: Peter Smith.
40.
He, X., Raymon, L. P., Mattson, M. V., Eldefrawi, M. E., & de Costa, B. R. (1993). Further studies of the structure-activity relationships of 1-[1-(2-benzo[b]thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 36(25), 4075-4081.
41.
Hearst, E. (1969). Excitation, inhibition, and discrimination learning. In H. W. Mackintosh (Ed.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 1-41). Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University Press.
42.
Hebb, D. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
43.
Heise, G. A. (1984). Behavioral methods for measuring effects of drugs on learning and memory in animals. Medicinal Research Reviews, 4(4), 535-558.
44.
Hochberg, J. (1982). How big is a stimulus? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 191-217). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Holland, P., Bashaw, M., & Quinn, J. (2002). Amount of training and stimulus salience affect associability changes in serial conditioning. Behavioral Processes, 59(3), 169-169.
46.
Hull, C. L. (1931). Goal attraction and directing ideas conceives as habit phenomena. Psychological Review, 38, 487-506.
47.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
48.
Hulse, S. H., Fowler, H., & Honig, W. (1978). Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Hunter, W. (1913). The delayed reaction in animals and children. Behavior Monographs, 2(6).
50.
Idrobo, F., Mostofsky, D. I., & Nandy, K. (1988). Acute effects of centrophenoxine short term administration on counting behavior in rats. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42(3-4), 309-313.
51.
Ingram, D. K. (1996). Brain-behavior linkages in aged rodent models: strategies for examining individual differences. Neurobiological Aging, 17(3), 497-499.
52.
Izquierdo, L. A., et al. (2002). Molecular pharmacological dissection of short- and long-term memory. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 22(3), 269-287.
53.
Izquierdo, I., Medina, J. H., Vianna, M. R., Izquierdo, L. A., & Barros, D. M. (1999). Separate mechanisms for short- and long-term memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 103(1), 1-11.
54.
Johnston, T. (1981). Contrasting approaches to a theory of learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 125-173.
55.
Kendler, H. (1952). “What is learned?”—A theoretical blind alley. Psychology Review, 59, 269-277.
56.
Kesner, R. P., & Dakis, M. (1995). Phencyclidine injections into the dorsal hippocampus disrupt long- but not short-term memory within a spatial learning task. Psychopharmacology, 120(2), 203-208.
57.
Kesner, R. P., & Rolls, E. T. (2001). Role of long-term synaptic modification in short-term memory. Hippocampus, 11(3), 240-250.
58.
Laties, V. G. (1975). The role of discriminative stimuli in modulating drug action. Fed Proc, 34(9), 1880-1888.
59.
Laties, V. G., Clard, R. L., & Reynolds, M. D. (1968). Overt “mediating” behavior during temporally spaced responding. In A. C. Catania (Ed.), Contemporary research in operant behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
60.
Li, H. B., Matsumoto, K., Yamamoto, M., & Watanabe, H. (1997). NMDA but not AMPA receptor antagonists impair the delay-interposed radial maze performance of rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 58(1), 249-253.
61.
Lindner, M. D. (1997). Reliability, distribution, and validity of age-related cognitive deficits in the Morris water maze. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 68(3), 203-220.
62.
Lorenz, K. (1950). Innate behavior. In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, No. 4: Physiological mechanisms in animal behavior. New York: Academic Press.
63.
Matsuoka, N., & Aigner, T. G. (1996). D-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine site coupled to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, improves visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 278(2), 891-897.
64.
McNamara, R. K., & Skelton, R. W. (1993). The neuropharmacological and neurochemical basis of place learning in the Morris water maze. Brain Research: Brain Research Reviews, 18(1), 33-49.
65.
Mechner, F., & Guevrekian, L. (1962). Effects of deprivation upon counting and timing in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 109-122.
66.
Mechner, F., & Latranyi, M. (1963). Behavioral effects of caffeine, methamphetamine, and methylphenidate in the rat. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6(3), 331-342.
67.
Morris, R. G. (1989). Synaptic plasticity and learning: Selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5. Journal of Neuroscience, 9(9), 3040-3057.
68.
O'Steen, W. K., Spencer, R. L., Bare, D. J., & McEwen, B. S. (1995). Analysis of severe photoreceptor loss and Morris water-maze performance in aged rats. Behavioral Brain Research, 68(2), 151-158.
69.
Owens, J. G., et al. (1996). Design and evaluation of an olfactometer for the assessment of 3-methylindole-induced hyposmia. Fundamentals Applied Toxicology, 33(1), 60-70.
70.
Picker, M. J., Cleary, J. P., Berens, K., Oliveto, A. H., & Dykstra, L. A. (1989). Molindone: Effects in pigeons responding under conditional discrimination tasks. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 32(2), 439-445.
71.
Pontecorvo, M. J., Clissold, D. B., White, M. F., & Ferkany, J. W. (1991). N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists and working memory performance: Comparison with the effects of scopolamine, propranolol, diazepam, and phenylisopropyladenosine. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105(4), 521-535.
72.
Rachlin, H. (1995). Behavioral economics without anomalies. Joural of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64(3), 397-404.
73.
Rao, S. G., Williams, G. V., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1999). Isodirectional tuning of adjacent interneurons and pyramidal cells during working memory: Evidence for microcolumnar organization in PFC. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81(4), 1903-1916.
74.
Rauch, T. M., Welch, D. I., & Gallego, L. (1989). Hypothermia impairs performance in the Morris water maze. Physiological Behavior, 46(2), 315-320.
75.
Reynolds, G. (1961). Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 289-294.
76.
Richards, J. B., Sabol, K. E., & Seiden, L. S. (1993). DRL interresponse-time distributions: Quantification by peak deviation analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(2), 361-385.
77.
Roberts, W., & Mitchell, S. (1994). Can a pigeon simulataneously process temporal and numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 66-78.
78.
Robinson, G., Crooks, G. B., Shinkman, P. G., & Gallagher, M. (1989). Behavioral effects of MK 801 mimic deficits associated with hippocampal damage. Psychobiology, 17, 156-164.
79.
Salman, D. (1943). Notes on the number conception in animal psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 33, 209-219.
80.
Saucier, D., Hargreaves, E. L., Boon, F., Vanderwolf, C. H., & Cain, D.P. (1996). Detailed behavioral analysis of water maze acquisition under systemic NMDA or muscarinic antagonism: Nonspatial pretraining eliminates spatial learning deficits. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110(1), 103-116.
81.
Schneider, J. S., Tinker, J. P., Van Velson, M., & Giardiniere, M. (2000). Effects of the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine on cognitive functioning in chronic low dose MPTP-treated monkeys. Brain Research, 860(1-2), 190-194.
82.
Schwartz, B. L., Hashtroudi, S., Herting, R. L., Schwartz, P., & Deutsch, S. I. (1996). d-Cycloserine enhances implicit memory in Alzheimer patients. Neurology, 46(2), 420-424.
83.
Shimp, G. (1966). Probabilitstically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Analyses of Behavior, 9, 443-455.
84.
Sidman, M. (1992). Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. Journal of Experimental Analyses of Behavior, 58(1), 173-182.
85.
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Analyses of Behavior, 37(1), 5-22.
86.
Skinner, B. F. (1934). The extinction of chained reflexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 20, 234-237.
87.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.
88.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). Phylogenic and ontogenic environments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 701-707.
89.
Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430-444.
90.
Sutherland, N. (1964). Discrimination learning: Nonadditivity of cues. Nature, 201, 528-530.
91.
Suzuki, W. A. (1999). The long and the short of it: Memory signals in the medial temporal lobe. Neuron, 24(2), 295-298.
92.
Terrace, H. S. (1966). Behavioral contrast and the peak shift: Effects of extended discrimination training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 613-617.
93.
Terrace, H. S. (1985). On the nature of animal thinking: Discrimination learning and inhibition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 643-652.
94.
Terrace, H. S. (1986). A nonverbal organism's knowledge of ordinal position in a serial learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 203-214.
95.
Thompson, R. F. (1986). The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science, 233(4767), 941-947.
96.
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon.
97.
Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
98.
Vanderwolf, C. H., & Cain, D. P. (1994). The behavioral neurobiology of learning and memory: A conceptual reorientation. Brain Research: Brain Research Review, 19(3), 264-297.
99.
van Haaren, F., van Hest, A., & van Hattum, T. (1989). Scopolamine and methylscopolamine differentially affect fixed-consecutive-number performance of male and female Wistar rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 33(2), 361-365.
100.
Vianna, M. R., Izquierdo, L. A., Barros, D. M., Walz, R., Medina, J. H., & Izquierdo, I. (2000). Short-and long-term memory: Differential involvement of neurotransmitter systems and signal transduction cascades. Anals da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 72(3), 353-364.
101.
Wagner, A., Logan, F. A., Haberlandt, K., & Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.
102.
Ward, L., Mason, S. E., & Abraham, W. C. (1990). Effects of the NMDA antagonists CPP and MK-801 on radial arm maze performance in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 35(4), 785-790.
103.
Wesierska, M., Macias-Gonzalez, R., & Bures, J. (1990). Differential effect of ketamine on the reference and working memory versions of the Morris water maze task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104(1), 74-83.
104.
Whishaw, I. Q. (1985). Cholinergic receptor blockade in the rat impairs locale but not taxon strategies for place navigation in a swimming pool. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99(5), 979-1005.
105.
White, A. M., & Best, P. J. (1998). The effects of MK-801 on spatial working memory and within-session spatial learning. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 59(3), 613-617.
106.
Willmore, C. B., Bespalov, A. Y., & Beardsley, P. M. (2001). Competitive and noncompetitive NMDA antagonist effects in rats trained to discriminate lever-press counts. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 69(3-4), 493-502.
107.
Willmore, C. B., Bespalov, A. Y., & Beardsley, P. M. (2002). Site-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate antagonists produce distinct effects in rats performing complex discriminations. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 78(2), 347-364.
108.
Willmore, C. B., LaVecchia, K. L., & Wiley, J. L. (2001). NMDA antagonists produce site-selective impairment of accuracy in a delayed nonmatch-to-sample task in rats. Neuropharmacology, 41(8), 916-927.
109.
Wozniak, D. F., Olney, J. W., Kettinger, L. III, Price, M., & Miller, J. P. (1990). Behavioral effects of MK-801 in the rat. Psychopharmacology, 101(1), 47-56.
110.
Zajaczkowski, W., Quack, G., & Danysz, W. (1996). Infusion of (+)-MK-801 and memantine—Contrasting effects on radial maze learning in rats with entorhinal cortex lesion. European Journal of Pharmacology, 296(3), 239-246.
111.
Zentall, T. R. (2002). A cognitive behaviorist approach to the study of animal behavior. Journal of General Psychiatry, 129(4), 328-363.
