Effect of Early Rehabilitation on Walking Independence and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Foot Wounds: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2026
Effect of Early Rehabilitation on Walking Independence and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Foot Wounds: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
Rehabilitation is usually provided to patients with chronic foot wounds (CFWs) after surgery. This study aimed to assess whether early postoperative rehabilitation could maintain walking independence in hospitalized patients with CFWs. This single-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed between September 10, 2018 and March 2019, involving 60 patients who underwent both surgical procedures and rehabilitation. Participants were randomly allocated into the early rehabilitation (EG, n = 30) or the control (CG, n = 30) groups. EG received early rehabilitation immediately after surgery, while CG received late rehabilitation after wound closure. Both groups received rehabilitation sessions 5 times per week until discharge. The primary outcome was walking independence, measured via Functional Independence Measure (FIM)-gait scores. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EuroQol 5 dimensions 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) and the presence of rehabilitation-related adverse events, including dehiscence of wounds and falls. Differences in intervention timing effects were analyzed using nonparametric split-plot factorial design analysis, including Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < .05). Out of the 60 participants, 53 patients completed the discharge follow up. Three participants (10.0%) from the EG and 4 (13.3%) from the CG dropped out due to postoperative complications unrelated to rehabilitation intervention. No rehabilitation-related adverse events were found. Participants in the EG maintained greater FIM-gait scores during hospitalization than the CG (difference, −1; P = .0001), with a difference of 0 (P = .109) at discharge. EQ-5D-5L significantly improved in both groups (EG: difference, 0.13 [P = .014], CG: difference, 0.17 [P = .0074]). The EG intervention was associated more with maintaining walking independence at discharge than CG intervention. Postoperative rehabilitation improved HRQoL without adverse events, indicating that clinicians should recommend early rehabilitation for patients with CFW to enhance walking independence.
Diabetes atlas. 7th ed. International Diabetes Federation.
2.
SinghNArmstrongDGLipskyBA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005;293(2):217-228.
3.
WalshJWHoffstadOJSullivanMOMargolisDJ. Association of diabetic foot ulcer and death in a population-based cohort from the United Kingdom. Diabet Med. 2016;33(11):1493-1498.
4.
PrompersLHuijbertsMApelqvistJ, et al.High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious co-morbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50(1):18-25.
5.
LipskyBABerendtARCorniaPB, et al.Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e132-e173.
6.
LaveryLAArmstrongDGWunderlichRPTredwellJBoultonAJ. Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1435-1438.
7.
LarssonJAgardhCDApelqvistJStenströmA. Long-term prognosis after healed amputation in patients with diabetes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998(350):149-158.
8.
SonodaYMaeshigeNUemuraM, et al.Effect of partial foot amputation level on gait independence in patients with chronic lower extremity wounds: a retrospective analysis of a Japanese multicenter database. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023:15347346231158864.
9.
DudkiewiczISchwarzOHeimMHermanASiev-NerI. Trans-metatarsal amputation in patients with a diabetic foot: reviewing 10 years experience. Foot (Edinb). 2009;19(4):201-204.
10.
GöktepeASCakirBYilmazBYaziciogluK. Energy expenditure of walking with prostheses: comparison of three amputation levels. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(1):31-36.
11.
EvansKKAttingerCEAl-AttarA, et al.The importance of limb preservation in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications. 2011;25(4):227-231.
12.
AttingerCEBrownBJ. Amputation and ambulation in diabetic patients: function is the goal. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(Suppl 1):93-96.
13.
BrownMTangWPatelABaumhauerJ. Partial foot amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):707-716.
14.
LiYBurrowsNRGreggEWAlbrightAGeissLS. Declining rates of hospitalization for nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation in the diabetic population aged 40 years or older: U.S., 1988–2008. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2):273-277.
15.
GreggEWLiYWangJ, et al.Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990–2010. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(16):1514-1523.
16.
LombardoFLMagginiMDe BellisASeghieriGAnichiniR. Lower extremity amputations in persons with and without diabetes in Italy: 2001–2010. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86405.
17.
DillonMPKohlerFPeevaV. Incidence of lower limb amputation in Australian hospitals from 2000 to 2010. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(2):122-132.
18.
VamosEPBottleAEdmondsMEValabhjiJMajeedAMillettC. Changes in the incidence of lower extremity amputations in individuals with and without diabetes in England between 2004 and 2008. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(12):2592-2597.
19.
SantiMDThomaBJChambersRB. Survivorship of healed partial foot amputations in dysvascular patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;292:245-249.
20.
MuellerMAllenBSinacoreD. Incidence of skin breakdown and higher amputation after transmetatarsal amputation: implications for rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(1):50-54.
21.
PollardJHamiltonGARushSMFordLA. Mortality and morbidity after transmetatarsal amputation: retrospective review of 101 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45(2):91-97.
22.
DillinghamTPezzinLShoreA. Reamputation, mortality and health care costs among persons with dysvascular lower-limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):480-486.
23.
IzumiYSatterfieldKLeeSHarklessLB. Risk of reamputation in diabetic patients stratified by limb and level of amputation: a 10-year observation. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(3):566-570.
24.
ElsharawyMA. Outcome of midfoot amputations in diabetic gangrene. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25(6):778-782.
25.
LandryGSilvermanDLiemTMitchellEMonetaG. Predictors of healing and functional outcome following transmetatarsal amputations. Arch Surg. 2011;146(9):1005-1009.
26.
FlynnKEDombeckCBDeWittEMSchulmanKAWeinfurtKP. Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: Investigator perceptions. Clin Trials. 2008;5(6):575-586.
27.
BerlowitzDRFoyCGKazisLE, et al.; SPRINT Research Group. Effect of intensive blood-pressure treatment on patient-reported outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):733-744.
28.
BlomeCBaadeKDebusESPricePAugustinM. The “wound-QOL”: a short questionnaire measuring quality of life in patients with chronic wounds based on three established disease specific instruments. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(4):504-514.
29.
GoodneyPShahSHuYD, et al.A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(5):1762-1775.
30.
QuigleyMDillonMP. Quality of life in persons with partial foot or transtibial amputation: a systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(1):18-30.
31.
DillonMPFatoneS. Deliberations about the functional benefits and complications of partial foot amputation: do we pay heed to the purported benefits at the expense of minimizing complications?Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1429-1435.
32.
MaeshigeNHayashiHTerashiH, et al.Effect of early rehabilitation on gait, wound and home discharge in lower extremity chronic wound patients: a Japanese multicenter retrospective study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2021:15347346211039588.
33.
HonigLSVellasBWoodwardM, et al.Trial of solanezumab for mild dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):321-330.
34.
BorgGA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-381.
35.
HamiltonBBLaughlinJAFiedlerRCGrangerCV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26(3):115-119.
36.
ImaokaSSatoKFurukawaMOkitaMHigashiT. Reamputation in patients with diabetes-related minor amputations who underwent physical therapy during their hospitalization. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021;14(1):14.
37.
KobayashiTKodamaAOkazakiT, et al.Prognostic significance of preoperative functional independence measure (FIM) on long-term outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;83:275-283.
38.
HerdmanMGudexCLloydA, et al.Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727-1736.
39.
ShiroiwaTIkedaSNotoS, et al.Comparison of value set based on DCE and/or TTO data: scoring for EQ-5D-5L health states in Japan. Value Health. 2016;19(5):648-654.
40.
TakaharaMKatakamiNShiraiwaT, et al.Evaluation of health utility values for diabetic complications, treatment regimens, glycemic control and other subjective symptoms in diabetic patients using the EQ-5D-5L. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(3):309-319.
41.
ImaokaSKudouGTsugiyamaK, et al.Efficacy of belt electrode skeletal muscle electrical stimulation in the postoperative rest period in patients with diabetes who have undergone minor amputations: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2022:15347346221077491.
42.
UenoKKanekoHKamiyaK, et al.Association of early acute-phase rehabilitation initiation on outcomes among patients aged ≥90 years with acute heart failure. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023;71(6):1840-1850.
43.
BusSAArmstrongDGGoodayC, et al.International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(Suppl 1):e3274.
44.
VasPRaymanGDhatariyaK, et al.Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(Suppl 1):e3284.
45.
RaymanGVasPDhatariyaK, et al.International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Guidelines on use of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(Suppl 1):e3283.
46.
BusSALaveryLAMonteiro-SoaresM, et al.International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(Suppl 1):e3269.
47.
MaeshigeNUemuraMHirasawaY, et al.Immediate effects of weight-bearing calf stretching on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and plantar pressure during gait in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2021:15347346211031318.
48.
MaeshigeNMoriguchiMFujiiM, et al.Acute effects of combination therapy by triceps surae stretching and electrical stimulation to the tibialis anterior on medial forefoot plantar pressure during gait in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023:15347346221148456.
49.
ZhengYDouLFuQLiS. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: a longitudinal study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1074969.
50.
BeninatoMGill-BodyKMSallesSStarkPCBlack-SchafferRMSteinJ. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(1):32-39.
