Two-Step Conservative Surgery for Complicated Forms of Diabetes-Related Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract

Diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a common yet complex condition, often complicated by concurrent soft tissue infections (STIs). This study evaluates the efficacy of a two-step conservative surgical approach, hypothesizing that it offers comparable outcomes to a one-step procedure. Conducted on a cohort of 93 patients with DFO, the study categorized cases into two types: OM1 (osteomyelitis without STI) and OM2 (osteomyelitis with STI). OM2 was further subdivided into OM2a (early diagnosis) and OM2b (late diagnosis), with OM2 patients undergoing initial soft tissue debridement followed by elective bone surgery. The results indicated no significant differences in infection recurrence or amputation rates between the two surgical approaches, with recurrence observed in 20.7% of cases and amputations in 10.8%. The two-step procedure was associated with higher inflammatory responses and greater need for antibiotics and hospital admissions. However, these factors did not translate into increased recurrence or amputation compared to the one-step procedure. The study supports the two-step approach as a safe and effective method for managing complicated DFO cases, providing a viable alternative to immediate amputation or single-stage surgery. Despite some limitations, including regional specificity and potential underdiagnosis in late-diagnosed cases, the findings offer valuable insights for clinical management and suggest further research to refine treatment protocols. The study's strengths include confirmed histopathological diagnoses and consistent follow-up, reinforcing the validity of the two-step surgical approach for complex DFO treatment.

Keywords

diabetic foot infection diabetic foot osteomyelitis conservative surgery wound healing diabetic foot ulcers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lipsky

Senneville

Abbas

, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(Suppl 1):e3280.

Uckay

Aragon-Sanchez

Lew

Lipsky

. Diabetic foot infections: what have we learned in the last 30 years? Int J Infect Dis. 2015;40(8):81-91.

Aragon-Sanchez

. Clinical-pathological characterization of diabetic foot infections: grading the severity of osteomyelitis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2012;11(2):107-112.

Carro

de Jesus

Ricci

. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: is it all the same? Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023:15347346231160614.

Aragon-Sanchez

Lipsky

Lazaro-Martinez

. Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis: is the combination of probe-to-bone test and plain radiography sufficient for high-risk inpatients? Diabet Med. 2011;28(2):191-194.

Aragon-Sanchez

Viquez-Molina

Lopez-Valverde

Rojas-Bonilla

Segura-Retana

. Residual osteomyelitis at the resection margin after conservative surgery is not associated with the recurrence of diabetic foot infection and may successfully be treated without postoperative antibiotic therapy. Diabet Med. 2023;40(10):e15162.

Aragon-Sanchez

Viquez-Molina

Lopez-Valverde

Rojas-Bonilla

. Prospective validation of the value of adding osteomyelitis to moderate and severe categories of diabetic foot infections. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2022;21(4):15347346221116740.

Aragon-Sanchez

Cabrera-Galvan

Quintana-Marrero

, et al. Outcomes of surgical treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: A series of 185 patients with histopathological confirmation of bone involvement. Diabetologia. 2008;51(11):1962-1970.

Berthol

Robineau

Boucher

, et al. Two-Step sequential approach for concomitant skin and soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis complicating the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):e170-e1e1.