Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most severe complications of diabetes, with hemoglobin (HGB) and inflammatory markers playing pivotal roles in its pathogenesis. However,the modifying effects of interactions between blood cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) exposure and these biological indicators on the risk of DFU remain unclear. This study evaluates how Cd and Pb exposure contributes to DFU risk, with a specific focus on the potential mediating role of HGB.
Methods
Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. A total of 1633 participants (including 132 with DFU and 1501 Non-DFU) were included in the final analysis. Weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) assessed associations between blood cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), HGB, and DFU. Mediation analysis explored HGB's regulatory role in the Cd–DFU pathway, supplemented by subgroup analyses.
Results
After adjusting for all covariates, Blood Cd level was significantly associated with DFU risk (OR = 1.84; 95% CI:1.17–2.90, P = 0.01).RCS revealed a potential non-linear dose-response relationship with a risk threshold at 1.268 nmol/L, beyond which risk escalated sharply. In contrast,HGB served as an independent protective factor for DFU(OR = 0.73; 95% CI:0.60-0.87, P < 0.001).Notably, a positive correlation was observed between Blood Cd and HGB levels(β = 0.33, P < 0.001). Mediation analysis demonstrated that HGB exerted a significant suppression effect on the Cd–DFU association, accounting for −35.79% of the total effect (P = 0.04). Subgroup analyses identified higher DFU susceptibility among smokers (OR = 2.63;95%CI: 1.78-3.78), males, and individuals with elevated HbA1c levels.
Conclusion
Blood Cd is a significant risk factor for the development of DFU, while HGB provides a compensatory suppression effect that partially buffers Cd-induced toxicity. These findings suggest that elevated HGB levels in people with diabetes may mask the true risks associated with blood Cd, potentially leading to a significant underestimation of DFU risk in clinical practice.
StaffordLKGageAXuYY, et al.Global, regional, and national cascades of diabetes care, 2000-23: A systematic review and modelling analysis using findings from the global burden of disease study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025;13(11):924-934. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00217-7
2.
IslamKIslamRNguyenI, et al.Diabetes Mellitus and associated vascular disease: Pathogenesis, complications, and evolving treatments. Adv Ther. 2025;42(6):2659-2678. doi:10.1007/s12325-025-03185-9
3.
BurhanASubpaiboonkitRHuangHC. Global prevalence of diabetes-related neuropathy and vascular complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2026;232:113103. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113103
4.
RaoAGShahidSPervezNPervezRAhmedR. Trends and disparities in mortality due to diabetes Mellitus and sepsis in the US adults: 1999-2023. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025;8(5):e70082. doi:10.1002/edm2.70082
5.
WangQLiuCAnJLiuJWangYCaiY. Mechanisms of microbial infection and wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer: Pathogenicity in the inflammatory-proliferative phase, chronicity, and treatment strategies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025;16:1657928. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1657928
6.
DawiJTumanyanKTomasK, et al.Diabetic foot ulcers: Pathophysiology, immune dysregulation, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Biomedicines. 2025;13(5):1076. doi:10.3390/biomedicines13051076
7.
GodavartyALeivaKAmadiNKlonoffDCArmstrongDG. Diabetic foot ulcer imaging: An overview and future directions. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023;17(6):1662-1675. doi:10.1177/19322968231187660
8.
KosajiDAwadMIKatmahR, et al.Diabetic foot prevention, assessment, and management using innovative smart wearable technology: A systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025;22(1):168. doi:10.1186/s12984-025-01695-9
9.
HasaniMKhazdouzMSobhaniS, et al.Association of heavy metals and bio-elements blood level with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024;23(2):1719-1752. doi:10.1007/s40200-024-01500-9
10.
CaiLYanJSunLDanW. The independent and combined effects of blood heavy metal concentrations on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in adult patients with diabetes mellitus. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1588078. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1588078
11.
ZhaoRLinSHanM, et al.Association between machine learning-assisted heavy metal exposures and diabetic kidney disease: A cross-sectional survey and Mendelian randomization analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1367061. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1367061
12.
DemirkolDAktaşŞÖzcanTTannierX. Selçukcan Erol Ç. Analysis of risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A cohort study from a tertiary center. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022;56(5):333-339. doi:10.5152/j.aott.2022.22052
13.
QinYDengS. Inflammation, diabetic foot and related treatments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025;16:1676621. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1676621
14.
SangeetaSSiripuramCKonkaS, et al.Biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in early detection of diabetic foot ulcers. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82174. doi:10.7759/cureus.82174
15.
MillerDTPaschalDCGunterEWStroudPED'AngeloJ. Determination of lead in blood using electrothermal atomisation atomic absorption spectrometry with a L'vov platform and matrix modifier. Analyst. 1987;112(12):1701-1704. doi:10.1039/an9871201701
16.
ParsonsPJSlavinW. A rapid Zeeman graphite furnace atomic-absorption spectrometric method for the determination of lead in blood. Spectrochim Acta. 1993;48B(6/7):925-939. doi: 10.1016/0584-8547(93)80094-B
17.
StoepplerMBrandtK. Determination of cadmium in blood and urine by electrothermal atomic-absorption spectrophotometry. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 1980;300:372-380.
18.
XingJHYuYTengLHuiXYGuoWG. Association of blood heavy metals with diabetic foot ulcers in U.S. Adults with diabetes: Insights from the 1999-2004 NHANES data. Diabetes Ther. 2025;16(6):1255-1266. doi:10.1007/s13300-025-01730-x
19.
LiuJChenKTangM, et al.Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate the adverse effects of cadmium exposure on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with diabetes and prediabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025;24(1):145. doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02698-5
20.
ZhangYGongXLiR, et al.Exposure to cadmium and lead is associated with diabetic kidney disease in diabetic patients. Environ Health. 2024;23(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12940-023-01045-z
21.
Balali-MoodMNaseriKTahergorabiZKhazdairMRSadeghiM. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: Mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:643972. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.643972
22.
SatarugSVeseyDAKhamphayaTWaeyengDYimthiangS. Environmental exposure to cadmium and lead exacerbates kidney function in people with diabetes. J Xenobiot. 2025;15(6):199. doi:10.3390/jox15060199
23.
ZhangFGuoCGYangCWangFWangWZhangL. Exposure-Response associations of ambient heavy metal and persistent organic pollutant with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A prospective cohort study. Environ Health (Wash). 2025;3(5):493-503. doi:10.1021/envhealth.4c00191
24.
PeanaMPelucelliAChasapisCT, et al.Biological effects of human exposure to environmental cadmium. Biomolecules. 2022;13(1):36. doi:10.3390/biom13010036
25.
RentschlerGBrobergKLundhTSkerfvingS. Long-term lead elimination from plasma and whole blood after poisoning. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(3):311-316. doi:10.1007/s00420-011-0673-0
26.
CharkiewiczAEOmeljaniukWJNowakKGarleyMNiklińskiJ. Cadmium toxicity and health effects-A brief summary. Molecules. 2023;28(18):6620. doi:10.3390/molecules28186620
27.
GluhchevaYPavlovaEPetrovaE, et al.Hematological and biochemical changes in adult rats in conditions of diabetes mellitus and cadmium exposure. Series on Biomechanics. 2024;38(4):108-115.
28.
MotafeghiFFakhriBMSGhassemi BarghiN. Mechanisms of ARA290 in counteracting cadmium-triggered neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2025;14(1):tfaf023. doi:10.1093/toxres/tfaf023
29.
SchreiberTScharnerBThévenodF. Insoluble HIFa protein aggregates by cadmium disrupt hypoxia-prolyl hydroxylase (PHD)-hypoxia inducible factor (HIFa) signaling in renal epithelial (NRK-52E) and interstitial (FAIK3-5) cells. Biometals. 2024;37(6):1629-1642. doi:10.1007/s10534-024-00631-z
30.
ThévenodFSchreiberTLeeWK. Renal hypoxia-HIF-PHD-EPO signaling in transition metal nephrotoxicity: Friend or foe?Arch Toxicol. 2022;96(6):1573-1607. doi:10.1007/s00204-022-03285-3
31.
AschnerMSkalnyAVLuR, et al.The role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1ɑ) modulation in heavy metal toxicity. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97(5):1299-1318. doi:10.1007/s00204-023-03483-7
32.
HoriguchiHKayamaFOgumaEWillmoreWGHradeckyPBunnHF. Cadmium and platinum suppression of erythropoietin production in cell culture: Clinical implications. Blood. 2000;96(12):3743-3747. doi:10.1016/0584-8547(93)80094-B
33.
RichterPFaroonOPappasRS. Cadmium and cadmium/zinc ratios and tobacco-related morbidities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1154. doi:10.3390/ijerph14101154
34.
OosterwijkMMHagedoornIJMMaatmanRGHJBakkerSJLNavisGLavermanGD. Cadmium, active smoking and renal function deterioration in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38(4):876-883. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfac270
35.
AnetorJIUcheCZAyitaEB, et al.Cadmium level, glycemic control, and indices of renal function in treated type II diabetics: Implications for polluted environments. Front Public Health. 2016;4:114. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00114
36.
TyczyńskaMHunekGKaweckaW, et al.Association between Serum concentrations of (certain) metals and type 2 diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Med. 2024;13(23):7443. doi:10.3390/jcm13237443
37.
AdokweJBPouyfungPKuraeiadS, et al.Concurrent lead and cadmium exposure among diabetics: A case-control study of socio-demographic and consumption behaviors. Nutrients. 2025;17(4):710. doi:10.3390/nu17040710
38.
AnHCSungJHLeeJSimCSKimSHKimY. The association between cadmium and lead exposure and blood pressure among workers of a smelting industry: A cross-sectional study. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017;29:47. doi:10.1186/s40557-017-0202-z
39.
HuangCHWangCWChenHC, et al.Gender difference in the associations among heavy metals with red blood cell hemogram. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19(1):189. doi:10.3390/ijerph19010189
