Abstract
Sociologists have long debated whether the concentration of immigrants in some neighborhoods exacerbates or mitigates disadvantage. This study extends this inquiry to investigate residential stability in poor immigrant neighborhoods. Quantitative analyses show that poor immigrant neighborhoods nationwide have an eviction rate 26 percent lower than similarly poor non-immigrant neighborhoods. Ninety in-depth interviews with landlords and tenants in two neighborhoods, Boston’s Chinatown and Houston’s Gulfton, demonstrate how co-ethnic owners and property managers engage in informal practices that provide flexibility to households at risk of displacement. However, in Chinatown’s enclave housing market, efforts by co-ethnic landlords and community organizations further suppress rents; in Gulfton’s secondary immigrant housing market, low rents (and low evictions) come at the cost of dilapidated housing. This article connects immigration and housing studies by underscoring how the protective qualities of some poor immigrant neighborhoods extend to housing dynamics, shielding their residents from evictions in a precarious housing market.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
