Occupational Therapists’ Views of Nussbaum’s Life Capability

Abstract

Life Capability is the first and most fundamental of Nussbaum’s 10 Central Human Functional Capabilities (CHFCs). This capability refers to a person having a quality life of normal duration. The purpose of this study was to explore the views’ of occupational therapists about Life Capability, specifically, their perspectives of this capability and its perceived relevance to practice. Semi-structured interviews with 14 occupational therapists in British Columbia, Canada, were conducted and thematically analyzed. Within this Canadian context, three themes emerged regarding occupational therapists’ views about Life Capability: basic human right, quality of life, and longevity. Occupational therapists appear to view Life Capability as being consistent with the values of the occupational therapy profession. Nussbaum’s other CHFCs warrant study to explore the degree to which the Capabilities Approach could complement existing occupational therapy theories, science, and practice.

Keywords

occupational therapy health-related quality of life qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adkins

E. R.

(1993). Quality of life after stroke: Exposing a gap in nursing literature. Rehabilitative Nursing, 18(3), 144-147.

Boelen

Dharamsi

Gibbs

(2012). The social accountability of medical schools and its indicators. Education for Health (Abingdon), 2, 180-194.

Clark

D. A.

(2005). Sen’s capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(8), 1339-1368.

Creswell

J. W.

(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Creswell

J. W.

(2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Cummins

R. A.

(1991). The comprehensive quality of life scale- intellectual disability: An initial report. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17(2), 259-264.

Cummins

R. A.

(2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 699-706.

Galheigo

S.M.

(2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(2), 60-66.

Galvin

Wilding

Whiteford

(2011). Utopian visions/dystopian realities: Exploring practice and taking action to enable human rights and occupational justice in a hospital context. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 378-385.

10.

Gasper

(2002). Is Sen’s capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development? Review of Political Economy, 14(4), 435-461.

11.

Gill

T. M.

Feinstein

A. R.

(1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 272(8), 619-626.

12.

Gillen

Burkhardt

(1998). Stroke rehabilitation: A function based approach. New York, NY: Mosby.

13.

Glass

T. A.

de Leon

C. M.

Marottoli

R. A.

Berkman

L. F.

(1999). Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. British Medical Journal, 319, 478-483.

14.

Hammell

K. W.

(2008). Reflections on… well-being and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 61-64.

15.

Hopkins

H. L.

Smith

H. D.

(Eds.). (1993). Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.

16.

Kodish

Gittelsohn

(2011). Systematic data analysis in qualitative health research: Building credible and clear findings. Sight and Life, 25, 52-56.

17.

Kronenberg

Pollard

(2005). Overcoming occupational apartheid: A preliminary exploration of the political nature of occupational therapy. In Kronenberg

Algado

S. S.

Pollard

(Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 58-86). Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.

18.

Lee

L. C.

Harrington

R. A.

Louie

B. B.

Newschaffer

C. J.

(2008). Children with autism: Quality of life and parental concerns. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1147-1160.

19.

Lennartsson

Silverstien

(2001). Does engagement with life enhance survival of elderly people in Sweden? The role of social and leisure activities. The Journal of Gerontology, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(6), 335-342.

20.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

21.

Mahoney

M.J.

(1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cognitive Theory and Research, 1(2), 161-175.

22.

Mayo

N. E.

Wood-Dauphinee

Cote

(2000). Prompt hospital discharge and home rehab is more beneficial for stroke patients. Geriatrics, 55(8), 60-62.

23.

Minichiello

Sullivan

Greenwood

Axford

(Eds.). (2004). Handbook for research methods for nursing and health science. Frenchs Forest, Australia: Prentice Hall Health.

24.

Nussbaum

(2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Nussbaum

(2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Nussbaum

(2007). Human rights and human capabilities. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20, 21-24.

27.

Nussbaum

(2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

28.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

29.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Creswell

J. W

. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

30.

Pollard

Alsop

Kronenberg

(2005). Reconceptualising occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 524-526.

31.

Ruta

Camfield

Donaldson

(2007). Sen and the art of quality of life maintenance: Towards a general theory of quality of life and its causation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 393-423.

32.

Sen

A. K.

(1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

33.

Sen

A. K.

(1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

34.

Sen

A. K.

(2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6, 151-166.

35.

Smith

(2002). Patients’ bill of rights—A comparative overview. Law and Government Division. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/prb0131-e.htm

36.

Thorne

(2008). Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

37.

Townsend

Wilcock

A. A.

(2004). Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 75-87.

38.

Velde

B.P.

(2001). Quality of life issues in community occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy In Health Care, 13(3), 145-151.

39.

Wilcock

A. A.

(1998). An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.

40.

Wilcock

A. A.

(2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.

41.

Wilcock

A. A.

Townsend

(2000). Occupational justice: Occupational therapy interactive dialogue. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7, 84-86.

42.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2006). World Federation of Occupational Therapists position statement on human rights. Forrestfield, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wfot.org/AboutUs/PositionStatements.aspx

43.

World Health Organization. (1948). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf