Stay-at-home mandates following the COVID-19 pandemic increased work from home (WFH). While WFH offers many benefits, navigating work in nontraditional contexts can be a challenge. The objective of this study was to explore the benefits and challenges of WFH during COVID-19 to identify supports and resources necessary. Comments from two free-response questions on a survey regarding experiences of WFH (N = 648, N = 366) were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. Four themes emerged: time use, considerations of working in the home space, intersections between work-life and home-life, and temporality of WFH as situated within a pandemic. Across all themes were concerns related to participation in both work and home roles, work performance, and well-being. Findings highlight the importance of support during times of disruption of occupational patterns, roles, and routines. Despite challenges, many individuals hoped to continue WFH. Organizations should consider the complex intersections of work-life and home-life to develop supportive policies and resources.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305
BickA.BlandinA.MertensK. (2020). Work from home after the COVID-19 outbreak [Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Paper]. https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2017r2
4.
BoellS. K.Cecez-KecmanovicD.CampbellJ. (2016). Telework paradoxes and practices: The importance of the nature of work. New Technology Work and Employment, 31(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12063
5.
BrannenJ. (2005). Time and the negotiation of work—family boundaries—Autonomy or illusion?Time & Society, 14(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x05050299
6.
BrynjolfssonE.HortonJ. J.OzimekA.RockD.SharmaG.TuYeH.-Y. (2020). COVID-19 and remote work: An early look at US data [National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper]. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27344
7.
CarnevaleJ. B.HatakI. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037
8.
ChananaN.Sangeeta. (2020). Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Public Affairs, e2508. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2508
9.
DelaisseA.-C.HuotS.VeronisL. (2020). Conceptualizing the role of occupation in the production of space. Journal of Occupational Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1802326
10.
DelanoeijeJ.VerbruggenM.GermeysL. (2019). Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Human Relations, 72(12), 1843–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823071
11.
DickieV.CutchinM. P.HumphryR. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
12.
DockeryA. M.BawaS. (2018). When two worlds collude: Working from home and family functioning in Australia. International Labour Review, 157(4), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12119
13.
DubeyA. D.TripathiS. (2020). Analysing the sentiments towards work-from-home experience during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation Management, 8(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.001_0003
14.
FritzH.CutchinM. P. (2017). The transactional perspective on occupation: A way to transcend the individual in health promotion interventions and research. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1366354
15.
GuyB.ArthurB. (2020). Academic motherhood during COVID-19: Navigating our dual roles as educators and mothers. Gender Work and Organization, 27(5), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12493
16.
HallD. T.RichterJ. (1987). Balancing work life and home life: What can organizations do to help?The Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 213–223.
17.
HammellK. W. (2020). Engagement in living during the COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing occupational disruption. Occupational Therapy Now, 22(4), 7–8.
18.
HockingC. (2021). Occupation in context: A reflection on environmental influences on human doing. Journal of Occupational Science, 28, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1708434
19.
HoffmanK. E.GarnerD.KoongA. C.WoodwardW. A. (2020). Understanding the intersection of working from home and burnout to optimize post-COVID-19 work arrangements in radiation oncology. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 108(2), 370–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.062
KossekE. E.OzekiC. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.139
22.
KramerA.KramerK. Z. (2020). The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442
23.
KreinerG.HollensbeE.SheepM. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916
24.
LottY. (2018). Does flexibility help employees switch off from work? Flexible working-time arrangements and cognitive work-to-home spillover for women and men in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2031-z
25.
NansenB.ArnoldM.GibbsM.DavisH. (2010). Time, space and technology in the working-home: An unsettled nexus. New Technology Work and Employment, 25(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2010.00244.x
PearlsonK. E.SaundersC. S. (2001). There’s no place like home: Managing telecommuting paradoxes. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/Ame.2001.4615008
28.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 905–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253488
29.
Shepherd-BaniganM.BellJ. F.BasuA.Booth-LaForceC.HarrisJ. R. (2016). Workplace stress and working from home influence depressive symptoms among employed women with young children. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9482-2
TrefaltP. (2013). Between you and me: Setting work-nonwork boundaries in the context of workplace relationships. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1802–1829. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0298
32.
TrougakosJ. P.ChawlaN.McCarthyJ. M. (2020). Working in a pandemic: Exploring the impact of COVID-19 health anxiety on work, family, and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(11), 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000739
33.
XiaoY.Becerik-GerberB.LucasG.RollS. C. (2021). Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002097
34.
ZemkeR. (2004). Time, space, and the kaleidoscopes of occupation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(6), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.6.608
35.
ZerubavelE. (1996). Lumping and splitting: Notes on social classification. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408386
