Arab occupational therapists are in need either to develop their own outcome measures or to translate well-known outcome measures to their culture. The objective of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate preliminarily the Role Checklist Version 3 (RCv3) into Arabic language. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process of the RCv3 into Arabic language was conducted in four main steps: (a) forward translation, (b) back translation, (c) expert panel review process, and (d) psychometric testing (Validity). The expert panel established the face validity and the content validity of the Arabic RCv3. Pilot testing was conducted, and the utility and content validity of the tool were confirmed. The final version of the Arabic RCv3 is now available for use in the Arab countries. However, further psychometric properties including reliability and responsiveness of this tool is warranted, thus supporting its wide use and proper application.
AlotaibiN.AljadiS.AlrowayehH. (2016). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic). Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(25), 2469–2478.
2.
AlotaibiN.Manee MurphyL.RassafianiM. (2019). Knowledge about and attitudes of interdisciplinary team members toward occupational therapy practice: Implications and future directions. Medical Principles and Practice, 28(2), 158–166.
3.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
4.
BonsaksenT.MeidertU.SchumanD.KvarsnesH.HaglundL.PriorS.. . . ScottP. J. (2015). Does the role checklist measure occupational participation?The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 3(3), Article 2.
5.
BouzubarF.AljadiS.AlotaibiN.IrrgangJ. (2018). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the knee outcome survey-activities for daily living scale. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40, 1817–1828.
6.
BrownM.DijkersM. P. J. M.GordonW. A.AshmanT.CharatzH.ChengZ. (2004). Participation objective, participation subjective: A measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19(6), 459–481.
7.
DickersonA. E. (2008). The role checklist. In Hemphill-PearsonB. J. (Ed.), Assessments in occupational therapy mental health: An integrative approach (2 ed., pp. 239–249). Slack.
8.
FasfousA. F.Al-JoudiH. F.PuenteA. E.Pérez-GarcíaM. (2017). Neuropsychological measures in the Arab World: A systematic review. Neuropsychology Review, 27(2), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-017-9347-3
9.
FengerK.SigurðardóttirM.ScottP. J. (2020). Hlutverkalistinn: Þátttaka og sátt. Þýðingarferli og mat á réttmæti og notagildi [The role checklist: Participation and satisfaction. Translation into Icelandic and testing of validity and usability]. Iðjuþjálfinn, 41(1), 6–13.
10.
KielhofnerG. (1985). Model of human occupation: Theory and application (1st ed.). Lippincott Wiliams & Williams.
11.
KielhofnerG. (2002). Model of human occupation: Theory and application (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
12.
KuliśD.ArnottM.GreimelE. R.BottomleyA.KollerM. (2011). Trends in translation requests and arising issues regarding cultural adaptation. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research, 11(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.27
13.
ManeeF.AlotaibiN.AlobaidlyF.Abu TariahH.HamedR.EklundM. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the satisfaction with daily occupations. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 260–267.
14.
MeidertU.BonsaksenT.ScottP. J. (2018). A study of measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health with the revised role checklist. Clinical Rehabilitation, 32(11), 1530–1539.
15.
OakleyF.KielhofnerG.BarrisR. (1985). An occupational therapy approach to assessing psychiatric patients' adaptive functioning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39(3), 147–154.
16.
OakleyF.KielhofnerG.BarrisR.ReichlerR. (1986). The role checklist: Development and empirical assessment of reliability. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 6(3), 158–170.
17.
ScottP. J. (2014). Measuring participation outcomes following life-saving medical interventions: The role checklist version 2: Quality of performance. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(13), 1108–1112.
18.
ScottP. J.McKinneyK.PerronJ.RuffE.SmileyJ. (2017, July5). Measurement of participation: The role checklist v3: Satisfaction and performance. In HuriM. (Ed.), Occupational therapy—Occupation focused holistic practice in rehabilitation (1st ed.). InTechOpen.
19.
Van AntwerpL.CrabtreeJ.ScottP.FengerK.HaglundL.KuoF. (2016). Translation guidelines for the role checklist version 2: Quality of performance feasibility study in Iceland and China. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(4_Supplement_1), 7011500016p1.
20.
WildD.GroveA.MartinM.EremencoS.McElroyS.Verjee-LorenzA.EriksonP. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
21.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health.
