Making choices is an essential part of functioning independently as an adult in society. Activities specifically directed toward helping students learn to make choices, however, are typically neglected in educational programs for students with severe disabilities. This paper presents a rationale for the inclusion of choice-making as an important skill area for persons with severe disabilities. Behavioral approaches that present useful means of conceptualizing choice-making in the school life of severely disabled students are identified. Procedures are suggested for teaching choice-making skills, for integrating opportunities for exercising those skills throughout the course of the student's school life, and for fostering choice-making skills through the use of logical consequences.
BellS. M.AinsworthM. D. S. (1972). Infant crying and maternal responsiveness. Child Development, 43, 1171–1190.
2.
BerkR. A. (1976). Effects of choice of instructional methods on verbal learning tasks. Psychological Reports, 38, 867–870.
3.
BrownL.FalveyM.VincentL.KayeN.JohnsonF.Ferrara-ParrishP.GruenewaldL. (1980). Strategies for generating comprehensive, longitudinal and chronological age appropriate individual educational plans for adolescent and young adult severely handicapped students. In BrownL.FalveyM.BaumgartD.PumpianI.SchroederJ.GruenewaldL. (Eds.), Strategies for teaching chronological age appropriate functional skills to adolescent and young adult severely handicapped students. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin - Madison, and Madison Metropolitan School District.
4.
DuncanD.SbardellatiE.MaheadyL.SainatoD. (1981). Nondiscriminatory assessment of severely physically handicapped individuals. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(2), 17–22.
5.
FelixbrodJ. J.O'LearyK. D. (1973). Effects of reinforcement on children's academic behavior as a function of self-determined and externally imposed contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 241–250.
6.
GuessD.Siegel-CauseyE. (in press). Behavioral control and education of severely handicapped students: Who's doing what to whom? and why? In BrickerD.FillerJ. (Eds.), Serving the severely retarded: From research to practice. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
7.
HockstraC. M. (1978). The effects of choice of consequences and procedures on preschool children's rate of working arithmetic problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University.
8.
HolvoetJ.BrewerM.MulliganM.GuessD.HelmstetterE.RiggsP. (1981). Influence of activity choice on learning among adolescent severely, multiply handicapped students. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
9.
KaczmarekL. A. (1977). A descriptive analysis of the home verbal environments of non-talking children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
10.
KlaberM. M.ButterfieldE. C. (1968). Stereotyped rocking — A measure of institution and ward effectiveness. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 13–20.
11.
KollinzasG. (1983). The Communication Record: Sharing information to promote sign language generalization. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8(3), 49–55.
12.
MithaugD. E.HanawaltD. A. (1978). The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 153–162.
13.
MithaugD. E.MarD. K. (1980). The relation between choosing and working prevocational tasks in two severely retarded young adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(1), 177–182.
14.
PerskeR. (1972). The dignity of risk. In WolfensbergerW. (Ed.), The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
15.
PorterR. H.RamseyB.TremblayA.IaccoboM.CrawleyS. (1978). Social interactions in heterogeneous groups of retarded and normally developing children: An observational study. In SackettG. P. (Ed.), Observing behavior, Vol. 1. Baltimore: University Park Press.
16.
Rogers-WarrenA. K. (1981, May). It takes two: Toward a behavioral analysis of mother-child interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.
17.
Rogers-WarrenA.WarrenS. F., (Eds.) (1977). Ecological perspectives in behavior analysis. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
18.
SaponS. M.KaczmarekL. A. (1975). The descriptive analysis of verbal behavior. Rochester, NY: Publications of the Verbal Behavior Laboratory.
19.
ShevinM. (1979, June). Crying as productive verbal behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Dearborn, MI.
20.
Sulzer-AzaroffB.MayerG. R. (1977). Applying behavior analysis procedures with children and youth. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21.
VeachD. M. (1977). Choice with responsibility. Young Children, 32(4), 22–25.
22.
WehmanP. (1979). Teaching recreational skills to severely and profoundly handicapped persons. In YorkR. L.EdgarE., (Eds.), Teaching the severely handicapped, volume 4. Seattle, WA: American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped.
23.
WehmanP.McLaughlinP. (1981). Program development in special education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
WhiteA. M. (1977). The effects of choice upon paired-associate learning and reading comprehension in children. 1974 undergraduate honors thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. As cited in Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. The importance of perceived control: Fact or fantasy. American Scientist, 65, 759–765.
25.
WuerchB. B.VoeltzL. M. (1982). Longitudinal leisure skills for severely handicapped learners: The Ho'onanea curriculum component. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
