Posture and movement abilities are typically measured by assessments of achievements of motor milestone skills. Performance of a skill within appropriate chronological age limits is one dimension of posture and movement. Qualitative dimensions, including postural tone and the pattern of coordinated movement used in performance, are equally important with young children. This article describes a programmatic approach for measuring qualitative dimensions and performance of functional movement. Features of the approach include: (a) selection of intervention targets, (b) baseline assessment, (c) intervention sequences, (d) measurement, and (e) interpretation and decision making. Data that were collected, using this approach, with infants and young children enrolled in an early intervention program are presented to illustrate measurement and interpretation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (1982). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
2.
BlyL. (1980). Analysis of normal and abnormal movement components. In SlatonD. (Ed.), Development of movement in infancy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Physical Therapy.
3.
BobathK. (1980). A neurophysiological basis for the treatment of cerebral palsy. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.
4.
BrickerD. D. (1982). Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants. Baltimore: University Park Press.
5.
CampbellP. H. (1983). Basic considerations in programming for students with movement difficulties. In SnellM. (Ed.), Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (pp. 168–202) Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
6.
CampbellP. H. (1985). Assessment of posture and movement in students with severe movement dysfunction. Unpublished monograph, Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Akron, OH.
7.
CampbellP. H. (1986). The application of neurodevelopmental treatment procedures with children with severe handicaps. In MiedanerJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of Northeastern Treatment Association Workshop, Newark, NJ.
8.
CampbellP. H. (in press-a). Neurodevelopmental treatment methods for teaching selfcare skills. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
CampbellP. H. (in press-b). Programming for students with movement dysfunction. In SnellM. (Ed.), Systematic instruction of students with moderate and severe handicaps (3rd ed.) Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
10.
CampbellP. H.CleggK.McFarlandL. (1982). Measuring motor behavior. In Stevens-DominquezM.Stremel-CampbellK. (Eds.), Ongoing data collection for measuring child progress (pp. 59–89) Monmouth, OR: Western States Technical Assistance Resource.
11.
CampbellP. H.McInerneyW. A.CooperM. A. (1984). Therapeutic programming for students with severe handicaps. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy38(9), 594–602.
12.
CampbellS. A. (1984a). Central nervous system dysfunction in children. In CampbellS. A. (Ed.), Pediatric neurologic physical therapy (pp. 1–12) New York: Churchill-Livingstone.
13.
CampbellS. A. (1984b). Pediatric neurologic physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
GorskiP. A. (1984). Infants at risk. In HansonM. J. (Ed.), Atypical infant development (pp. 57–80) Baltimore: University Park Press.
16.
HansonM. J. (1982). Issues in designing intervention approaches from developmental theory and research. In BrickerD. (Ed.), Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants (pp. 249–267) Baltimore: University Park Press.
17.
HansonM. J.HarrisS. (1986). Teaching your children with motor delays. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
18.
HaringN. G.LibertyK. A.WhiteO. R. (1980). Rules for data-based strategy decisions in instructional programs: Current research and instructional implications. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 159–192) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
HarrisS. (1981). Effects of neurodevelopmental therapy on improving motor performance in Down syndrome infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 477–83.
20.
HarrisS.TadaW. (1983). Providing developmental therapy services. In GarwoodS. G.FewellR. R. (Eds.), Educating handicapped infants (pp. 343–368) Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
21.
JenkinsJ. R.SellsC. J.BradyD.DownJ.MooreB.CarmanP.HolmR. (1982). Effects of developmental therapy on motor impaired children. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 2(4).
22.
LewisM.TaftL. (Eds.). (1982). Developmental disabilities: Theory, assessment, and intervention. New York: Spectrum Publications.
23.
OttenbackerK.YorkJ. (1984). Strategies for evaluating clinical change: Implications for practice and research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy38(10), 647–659.
24.
ScherzerA. L.MikeV.IlsonJ. (1976). Physical therapy as a determinant of change in cerebral palsied infants. Pediatrics, 58, 47–58.
25.
ScherzerA. L.TscharnuterI. (Eds.). (1982). Early diagnosis and therapy in cerebral palsy: A primer on infant development problems. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
26.
SheehanR.GallagherR. J. (1984). Assessment of infants. In HansonM. J. (Ed.), Atypical infant development (pp. 81–106) Baltimore: University Park Press.
27.
WilsonJ. A. (1984). Cerebral palsy. In CampbellS. (Ed.), Pediatric neurologic physical therapy (pp. 353–413) New York: Churchill Livingstone.
28.
WolffP. H. (1982). Theoretical issues in the development of motor skills. In LewisM.TaftL. (Eds.), Developmental disabilities: Theory, assessment, and intervention (pp. 117–134) New York: Spectrum Publications.
