Interrater Reliability of the Motivation Assessment Scale: Another,Closer Look

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), designed by Durand and Crimmins (1988) to measure influential maintaining variables of maladaptive behavior, is associated with inadequate interrater reliability. In this study, interrater reliability of the MAS was reinvestigated utilizing direct-care staff members familiar with persons with mental retardation. Problematic overt behaviors were evaluated in 42 adults in southern Nevada. MAS items were found to be reliable moderately but significantly across raters. Variables that affect reliability, including low or high behavior frequency, differential training procedures for raters, and setting selection should be considered closely by MAS administrators.

Keywords

adults assessment functional analysis functional assessment mental retardation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bihm

E. M.

Kienlen

T. L.

Ness

Poindexter

A. R.

(1991). Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale for persons with mental retardation. Psychological Reports, 68, 1235–1238.

Carr

E. G.

Durand

V. M.

(1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.

Durand

V. M.

(1990). Severe behavior problems: A functional communication approach. New York: Guilford.

Durand

V. M.

Crimmins

D. B.

(1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–117.

Durand

V. M.

Crimmins

D. B.

(1992). The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) administration guide. Topeka, KS: Monaco and Associates.

Dyer

(1993). Functional communication training: Review and future directions. The Behavior Therapist, 16, 18–21.

Groden

(1989). A guide for conducting a comprehensive behavioral analysis of a target behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 163–169.

Kearney

C. A.

Cheeseman

Beasley

J. F.

(1992, May). Construct validity of the Motivation Assessment Scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, OR.

Strosahl

K. D.

Linehan

M. M.

(1986). Basic issues in behavioral assessment. In Ciminero

A. R.

Calhoun

K. S.

Adams

H. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of behavioral assessment (2nd. ed.). New York: John Wiley 8#x38; Sons.

10.

Wieseler

N. A.

Hanson

R. H.

Chamberlain

T. P.

Thompson

(1985). Functional taxonomy of stereotypic and self-injurious behavior. Mental Retardation, 23, 230–234.

11.

Zarcone

J. R.

Rodgers

T. A.

Iwata

B. A.

Rourke

D. A.

Dorsey

M. F.

(1991). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: A failure to replicate. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 349–360.