Validation of a Low-Back Disorder Risk Model in a Prospective Study of Ergonomic Interventions into Manual Materials Handling Jobs

Abstract

Few tools used to evaluate the low-back disorder (LBD) risk of manual materials handling (MMH) tasks have assessed their predictive ability. Only valid and accurate tools can reliably determine if an ergonomic intervention will reduce injury. This study evaluated how well a LBD Risk model predicted LBD rate changes of modified jobs. A prospective cohort was used to study 36 repetitive, MMH jobs (32 having had an ergonomic intervention and four comparison jobs having no such change). Employees' trunk motions and work place factors were observed pre- and post-intervention, and the jobs' LBD rates were recorded for these periods. Results indicated a significant correlation between changes in the jobs' predicted LBD Risk values and changes in their actual LBD rates. Linear and Poisson regression models predicted a change in a job's LBD rate and the number of LBDs, respectively, as a function of the job's risk change. This prospective study also showed which ergonomic interventions reduced the jobs' mean LBD rates. This study supports use of the LBD Risk model to accurately assess a job's potential to produce LBDs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarås

, 1994, The impact of ergonomics intervention on individual health and corporate prosperity in a telecommunications environment, Ergonomics, 37: 1679–1696.

Bigos

et al, 1991, A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury, Spine, 16(6): 1–6.

Campbell

Stanley

, 1966, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Chaffin

Andersson

GBJ

, 1994, Occupational Biomechanics, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chaffin

Park

, (1973), A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational lifting factors, AIHA Journal, 34: 513–525.

Garg

Owen

, 1992, Reducing back stress to nursing personnel: An ergonomics intervention in a nursing home, Ergonomics, 35: 1353–1375.

Gill

Callaghan

, 1996, Intratester and intertester reproducibility of the lumbar motion monitor as a measure of range, velocity, and acceleration of the thoracolumbar spine, Clinical Biomechanics, 11(7): 418–421.

Hadler

, 1997, Back pain in the workplace. What you lift or how you lift matters far less than whether you lift or when, Spine, 22(9): 935–940.

Lavender

et al, 1997, Comparison of four methods commonly used to determine low-back disorder risk in a manufacturing environment, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 657–660.

10.

Marras

et al, 1992, Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 9: 75–87.

11.

Marras

et al, 1999, The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assess ment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders, Ergonomics, 42(1): 229–245.

12.

Marras

et al, 1995, Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally-related low back disorders, Ergonomics, 38(2): 377–410.

13.

Marras

et al, 1993, The role of dynamic three-dimensional motion in occupationally-related low back disorders, Spine, 18(5): 617–628.

14.

NIOSH, 1981, Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting, DHHS Publication*.