Performance Differences in a Navigation Task among Users Presented with a North-Up versus Track-Up Orientation Map Display

Abstract

The principal objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the orientation of the presented map on a navigation display (i.e., north-up vs. track-up) would influence performance in a computer-based navigation task. In addition, it was believed that the user's level of spatial ability would interact with the nature of the display. Results indicated that neither display led to more accurate or faster performance. However, the track-up group reported finding the task more difficult (higher workload) and rated the map display less helpful. The north-up group also reported such a display as potentially being more helpful in real world driving. Results indicated a significant correlation between spatial ability and performance accuracy, with high spatial ability scores associated with better performance on the navigation task. Implications for the design of navigation devices, such as those currently marketed for automobiles, will be discussed as well as areas warranting further research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alm

Sviden

Waern

(1997). Cognitive ITS: On cognitive integration of ITS functions around the driver's task. In Noy

Y. I.

(Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 231–237). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Aretz

A. J.

(1991). The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors, 33, 85–101.

Burnett

Joyner

(1997). An assessment of moving map and symbol-based route guidance systems. In Noy

Y. I.

(Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 115–137). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Burns

P. C.

(1998). Way finding errors while driving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 209–217.

Dabbs

J. M.

Chang

E. L.

Strong

R. A.

Milun

(1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 89–98.

Daemon

Kawashima

Akamatsu

(1997). Driver's cognitive process and route guidance. In Noy

Y. I.

(Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 273–286). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Eberts

R. E.

(1994). User interface design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Guilford

J. P.

Zimmerman

W. S.

(1981). Manual of instructions and interpretations for the Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey (revised edition). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

Harwood

Wickens

C. D.

(1991). Frames of reference for helicopter electronic maps: The relevance of spatial cognition and componential analysis. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 5–23.

10.

Hooper

E. Y.

Coury

B. G.

(1994). Graphical displays for orientation information. Human Factors, 36, 62–78.

11.

Kimura

Marunaka

Sugiura

(1997). Human factors considerations for automotive navigation systems-Legibility, comprehension, and voice guidance. In Noy

Y. I.

(Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 153–167). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

12.

13.

Moss

S. A.

Triggs

T. J.

(1997). Attention switching time: A comparison between young and experienced drivers. In Noy

Y. I.

(Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 381–392). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

14.

Olmos

Liang

C. C.

Wickens

C. D.

(1997). Electronic map evaluation in simulated visual meteorological conditions. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 37–66.

15.

Pohlmann

Traenkle

(1994). Orientation in road traffic. Age-related differences using an in-vehicle navigation system and a conventional map. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 689–702.

16.

Wickens

C. D.

(1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

17.

Wickens

C. D.

(1999). Frames of reference for navigation. In Gopher

Koriat

(Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 113–144). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

18.

Wickens

C. D.

Liang

C. C.

Prevett

Olmos

(1996). Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: Effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 241–271.

19.

Williams

(1999). Navigation display design: Displaying nearest airport information. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 91–106.