Modeling Mental Workload and Task Performance for Indirect Vision Driving

Abstract

Cognitive workload and task performance are modeled for indirect vision driving with fixed flat panel displays. The model is derived from the results of a field study in which eight participants negotiated a driving course in a military vehicle with natural and indirect vision. For the latter, the vehicle was driven with fixed flat panel, liquid crystal displays in the cab and a forward viewing monocular camera array mounted on the front roof of the vehicle and tilted slightly downward. In addition to recording driving performance, the study collected test battery ratings of the mental workload measures of attention allocation, perceived workload, situational awareness, motion sickness, perceived stress, and cognitive performance. As a result of the study, a mathematical model of road speed was derived for indirect vision driving as a function of the camera's field of view. The model considers the effects of scene compression on the informational needs of the driver in a self-paced task. Concurrently, a task analysis mental workload model was derived for indirect vision driving by mapping the cognitive and mental workload measures to a “skills-rules-knowledge” model of information processing. The model successfully explains apparently conflicting results for indirect vision driving from different experiments that examined on-board and teleoperations from the different camera lens used in the studies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allender

Salvi

Promisel

(1998, April). Evaluation of human performance under diverse conditions via modeling technology. In Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT), User's Guide (Appendix A). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

Ebenholtz

S. M.

[1992]. “Motion sickness and oculomotor systems in virtual environments.” Presence, 1(3), 302–305.

Hart

S.G.

Staveland

(1988). Development of the NASA Task Load Index (TLX): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P.A.

Meshkati

(Eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Kennedy

R. S.

Lane

N. E.

Lilienthal

M.G.

Berbaum

K.S.

Hettinger

L. J.

(1992). Profile analysis of simulator sickness symptoms: Application to virtual environment systems. Presence, 1(3), 295–301.

Kerle

R. H.

Bialek

H. M.

(1958). The construction, validation, and application of a Subjective Stress Scale (Staff Memorandum Fighter IV, Study 23). Presidio of Monterey, OA: US Army Leadership Research Unit.

Rasmussen

(1983). Skills, rules, knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257–267.

Taylor

R. M.

Selcon

S. J.

(1994). Situation in mind: Theory, applications, and measurement of situational awareness. In Gilson

Garland

D. J.

Koonce

J. M.

(Eds.), Situational Awareness in Complex Systems, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.

Wickens

C.D.

Gordon

S.E.

Liu

(1998). Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.