Neuromuscular Control and Active Trunk Stiffness during Isometric Flexion and Extension

Abstract

Pushing and pulling tasks account for 20% of low-back injury claims. Torso flexion necessary for pushing exertions requires different muscle recruitment than for extension exertions typical of lifting tasks. These differences in recruitment and control may influence spinal stability and associated risk of injury. Active muscle stiffness is considered the primary stabilizing mechanism for spinal stability. Therefore, active trunk stiffness was recorded while subjects generated upright isometric trunk flexion and extension exertions against an isotonic preload. Small pseudo-random force disturbances were superimposed on the preloads causing small amplitude trunk movements. Trunk stiffness was computed from systems identification of the measured force and trunk motion data. Results demonstrated significantly greater stiffness during flexion exertions as compared to extension exertions. EMG data suggest this difference was due to increased co-contraction during the flexion exertions. These behaviours were attributed to the need to augment neuromuscular control of spinal stability during pushing tasks. Keywords: Spine; Co-contraction; Push; Manual Materials Handling; Biomechanics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Choi

(2003). Quantitative assessment of co-contraction in cervical musculature. Med. Eng Phys., 25, 133–140.

Cholewicki

Simons

A. P. D.

Radebold

(2000). Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability. J.Biomechanics, 33, 1377–1385.

Crisco

J. J.

Panjabi

M. M.

Yamamoto

Oxland

T. R.

(1992). Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part II Experiment. Clin.Biomech., 7, 27–32.

Damkot

D. K.

Pope

M. H.

Lord

Frymoyer

J. W.

(1984). The relationship between work history, work environment and low- back pain in men. Spine, 9, 395–399.

Gardner-Morse

M. G.

Stokes

I. A. F.

(2001). Trunk stiffness increases with steady-state effort. Journal of Biomechanics, 34, 457–463.

Granata

K. P.

Bennett

B. E.

Low-back biomechanics and stability during pushing. Hum.Factors, (in press).

Granata

K. P.

Lee

Franklin

T. C.

Co-contraction Recruitment of Spinal Load during Isometric Trunk Flexion. Spine, (in press).

Granata

K. P.

Lee

P. E.

Rogers

Co-Contraction Recruitment and Spinal Load during Isometric Trunk Flexion. J.Biomech., (in press).

Kearney

R.E.

Stein

R.B.

(1997). Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, 44, 493–504.

10.

Lee

K. S.

Chaffin

D. B.

Waikar

A. M.

Chung

M. K.

(1989). Lower back muscle forces in pushing and pulling. Ergonomics, 32, 1552–1563.

11.

Lee

Rogers

Granata

K. P.

Active Trunk Stiffness Increases with Co-Contraction. J. Electromyo. Kinesiol., (in press).

12.

Moorhouse

K. M.

Granata

K. P.

Trunk stiffness and dynamics during active extension exertions. J.Biomechanics, (in press).

13.

Schibye

Sogaard

Martinsen

Klausen

(2001). Mechanical load on the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling of two-wheeled waste containers compared with lifting and carrying of bags and bins. Clin.Biomech., 16, 549–559.