Measuring Spatial Knowledge: Effects of the Relation between Acquisition and Testing

Abstract

Performance in human-robot interaction is related to the operator's mental map of the space in which the robot travels. Accordingly, accurate assessment of mental maps will be important for the design of human-robot interfaces. The present research used a factorial design experiment to examine two methods for acquiring spatial knowledge (reading a map vs. navigating in the space), three methods of testing spatial knowledge (drawing a map, navigating through the space, and estimating point-to-point distances. The results showed that performance in the navigation test was influenced by factors unrelated to the navigated distance, whereas map drawing especially was closely related to the actual distance. Map drawing resulted in a stronger relation between map distance and actual distance in the map training condition than in the navigation training condition. The results are interpreted in terms of transfer appropriate processing, and are applied to human-robot interface design.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bechtel

(1988). Philosophy of mind: An overview for cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

Blaxton

T. A.

(1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 657–668.

Butler

D. L.

Acquino

A. L.

Hissong

A. A.

Scott

P. A.

(1993). Wayfinding by newcomers in a complex building. Human Factors, 35, 159–173.

Chadwick

Gillan

Simon

Pazuchanics

(2004). Cognitive analysis methods for control of multiple robots: Robotics on $5 a day. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 688–692) Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

Darlington

R. B.

(1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gillan

D. J.

(1994). Cognitive psychophysics and mental models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, (pp. 256–260). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

Giraudo

Pailhous

(1994). Distortions and fluctuations in topological memory. Memory and Cognition, 22, 14–26.

Gollege

R. G.

Gale

Pellegrino

J. W.

Doherty

(1992). Spatial knowledge acquisition by children: Route learning and relational distances. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82, 223–244.

Jansen-Osman

Berendt

(2002). Investigating distance using virtual environments. Environment and Behavior, 34, 178–193.

10.

Kitchin

(1996). Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: Investigating configural knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 163–185.

11.

Kitchin

Blades

(2002). The cognition of geographic space. London: I. B. Tauris.

12.

Lynch

(1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Moratz

Tenbrink

Bateman

J. A.

Fischer

(2003). Spatial knowledge representation for human-robot interaction. Spatial Cognition 2003, 263–286.

14.

Morris

C. D.

Bransford

J. D.

Franks

J. J.

(1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.

15.

Tolman

E. C.

(1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55 189–208.

16.

Tulving

Thompson

D. M.

(1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 359–380.

17.

Taylor

H. A.

Tversky

(1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Memory and Cognition, 20, 261–292.

18.

Thorndyke

P. W.

Hayes-Roth

(1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560–589.

19.

Tversky

(2002). Structures of mental spaces: How people think about space. Environment and Behaviour, 35, 66–80.

20.

Wilson

(2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625–636.