Previous research has shown a computational model of visual saliency can predict where people fixate in cluttered web pages (Masciocchi & Still, 2013). Over time, web site designers are moving towards simpler, less cluttered webpages to improve aesthetics and to make searches more efficient. Even with simpler interfaces, determining a saliency ranking among interface elements is a difficult task. Also, it is unclear whether the traditionally employed saliency model (Itti, Koch, & Niebur, 1998) can be applied to simpler interfaces. To examine the model’s ability to predict fixations in simple web pages we compared a distribution of observed fixations to a conservative measure of chance performance (a shuffled distribution). Simplicity was determined by using two visual clutter models (Rosenholz, Li, & Nakano, 2007). We found under free-viewing conditions that the saliency model was able to predict fixations within less cluttered web pages.
References
1.
BeckM. R.LohrenzM. C.TraftonJ. G. (2010). Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: Global and local clutter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 238-250.
2.
BirkhoffG. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
ChenX.ZelinskyG. J. (2006). Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research, 46, 4118-4133.
4.
DengL.PooleM. S. (2012). Aesthetic design of e-commerce web pages – Webpage complexity, order and preference. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 420-440.
5.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.
6.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W.JohnstonJ. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
7.
FoulshamT.UnderwoodG. (2008). What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-17.
8.
HendersonJ. M.ChanceauxM.SmithT. J. (2009). The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: Evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-8.
9.
HoehlJ.LewisC. (2011, October). Mobile web on the desktop: simpler web browsing. In Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 263-264). ACM.
10.
IttiL.KochC. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
11.
IttiL.KochC.NieburE. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene-analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 1254-1259.
12.
IvoryM. Y.MegrawR. (2005). Evolution of web site design patterns. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23, 463-497.
13.
JovancevicJ.SullivanB.HayhoeM. (2006). Control of attention and gaze in complex environments. Journal of Vision, 6, 1431-1450.
14.
KarvonenK. (2000, November). The beauty of simplicity. In Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability (pp. 85-90). ACM.
15.
LavieT.TractinskyN. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 269-298.
16.
MasciocchiC. M.StillJ. D. (2013). Alternatives to eye tracking for predicting stimulus-driven attentional selection within interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 28, 418-441.
17.
MenonS.KahnB. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the internet shopping experience. Journal of Retailing, 78, 31-40.
18.
NielsenJ. (1999). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing.
19.
NeiderM. B.ZelinskyG. J. (2008). Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search. Visual Cognition, 16, 1-10.
20.
NeiderM. B.ZelinskyG. J. (2011). Cutting through the clutter: Searching for targets in evolving complex scenes. Journal of Vision, 11, 1-16.
21.
ParkhurstD.LawK.NieburE. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107-123.
22.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
23.
RosenD. E.PurintonE. (2004). Website design: Viewing the web as a cognitive landscape. Journal of Business Research, 57, 787-794.
24.
RosenholzR.LiY.MansfieldJ.JinZ. (2005). Feature congestion: A measure of display clutter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 761-770. ACM.
25.
RosenholzR.LiY.NakanoL. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-22.
26.
SchenkmanB. N.JonssonF. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19, 367-377.
SteelmanK. S.McCarleyJ. S.WickensC. D. (2013). Great expectations: Top-down attention modulates the costs of clutter and eccentricity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 403-419.
29.
StillJ. D.MasciocchiC. M. (2012). Considering the influence of visual saliency during interface searches. In AlkhalifaE. M.GaidK. (Eds.), Cognitively Informed Intelligent Interfaces: Systems Design and Development (pp. 84-97). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
TheeuwesJ. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806.
32.
TheeuwesJ. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77-99.
33.
TheeuwesJ.KramerA. F.HahnS.IrwinD. E. (2008). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
34.
TractinskyN.LowengartO. (2007). Web-store aesthetics in e- retailing: A conceptual framework and some theoretical implications. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1-18.
35.
TreismanA. M.GeladeG. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
36.
UnderwoodG.FoulshamT.van LoonE.HumphreysL.BloyceJ. (2006). Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 321-342.
37.
WolfeJ. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In GrayW. (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Oxford.
