Interruptions can Change the Perceived Relationship between Accuracy and Confidence

Abstract

Interruptions are disruptive in that they can decrease accuracy and the time taken to complete a task. In fields such as aviation and medicine, interruptions can not only reduce performance but lead to egregious outcomes. In such situations, confidence in whether a procedure has been completed may become a crucial aspect of judging where to resume a task. This paper demonstrates that interruptions both decrease accuracy and reduce confidence. More importantly, interruptions change the relationship between accuracy and confidence, reducing the likelihood that participants can determine where to resume appropriately.

References

Altmann

E. M.

Trafton

J. G.

(2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 39–83.

Brewer

Wells

G. L.

(2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(1), 11.

Brewer

W. F.

Sampaio

(2012). The metamemory approach to confidence: A test using semantic memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 59–77.

Busey

T. A.

Tunnicliff

Loftus

G. R.

Loftus

E. F.

(2000). Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 26–48.

Chisholm

C. D.

Dornfeld

A. M.

Nelson

D. R.

Cordell

W. H.

(2001). Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 38(2), 146–151.

Cutrell

Czerwinski

Horvitz

(2001). Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.26.418

Dunlosky

Metcalfe

(2008). Metacognition. SAGE Publications.

Grundgeiger

Sanderson

MacDougall

H. G.

Venkatesh

(2010). Interruption management in the intensive care unit: Predicting resumption times and assessing distributed support. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(4), 317.

S. Y.

Magrabi

Coiera

(2011). A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, amiajnl–2010.

10.

Odinot

Wolters

van Koppen

P. J.

(2009). Eyewitness memory of a supermarket robbery: a case study of accuracy and confidence after 3 months. Law and Human Behavior, 33(6), 506.

11.

ROEDIGER

H. L.

III DESOTO

K. A.

(2012). The Curious Complexity between Confidence and Accuracy in Reports from Memory. Memory and Law, 84.

12.

Roediger

H. L.

III DeSoto

K. A.

(2014). Confidence and memory: assessing positive and negative correlations. Memory, 22(1), 76–91.

13.

Sampaio

Brewer

W. F.

(2009). The role of unconscious memory errors in judgments of confidence for sentence recognition. Memory & Cognition, 37(2), 158–163.

14.

Smith

V. L.

Kassin

S. M.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(1989). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within-versus between-subjects correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 356.

15.

Trafton

J. G.

Altmann

E. M.

Ratwani

R. M.

(2011). A memory for goals model of sequence errors. Cognitive Systems Research, 12(2), 134–143.

16.

Trafton

J. G.

Jacobs

Harrison

A. M.

(2012). Building and verifying a predictive model of interruption resumption. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(3), 648–659.

17.

Westbrook

J. I.

Woods

Rob

M. I.

Dunsmuir

W. T.

Day

R. O.

(2010). Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 683–690.