Providing operators additional information helping them to validate alarms has been found to be a countermeasure for problems related to the cry wolf effect (i.e., operators ignoring alarms). Adding information can be realized with likelihood alarm systems (LAS) or with access to alarm validity information (AVI). The two studies presented here examined behavior and performance consequences of the combination of LAS and AVI in multi-task settings. It was investigated to what extent concurrent task performance and alert task performance depend on characteristics of the LAS (i.e. proportion of different alert types) and cost of cross-checking AVI. Results suggest that those LAS characteristics varied here do not influence participants’ performance. Secondly, no benefit of LAS over binary alarm systems (BAS) emerged when increasing the cost of accessing AVI. Results are further discussed with regard to participants’ response patterns.
References
1.
BlissJ. P.GilsonR. D.DeatonJ. E. (1995). Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics, 38, 2000-2012.
2.
BlissJ. P. (2003). An investigation of extreme alarm responses of extreme alarm response patterns in laboratory experiments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp.1683-1687). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3.
BraunC. C.SilverN. C. (1995). Interaction of signal word and colour on warning labels: differences in perceived hazard and behavioural compliance. Ergonomics, 38, 2207–2220.
4.
BreznitzS. (1984). Cry wolf: the psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
BustamanteE. A.BlissJ. P. (2005). Effects of workload and likelihood information on human response to alarm signals. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 81–85). Oklahoma City, OK: Wright State University.
6.
ChapanisA. (1994). Hazards associated with three signal, words and four colours on warning signs. Ergonomics, 37, 265–275.
7.
EdworthyJ. (2013). Alarms are still a problem!Anaesthesia, 68(8), 791-794.
8.
GettyD.SwetsJ. A.PickettR. M.GonthierD. (1995). System operator response to warnings of danger: A laboratory investigation of the effects of the predictive value of a warning on human response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(1), 19–33.
9.
LawlessS. T. (1994). Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Critical care medicine, 22(6), 981-985.
10.
MadhavanP.WiegmannD. A.LacsonF. C. (2006). Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(2), 241–256.
11.
ManzeyD.GérardN.WiczorekR. (2014). Decision-making and response strategies in interaction with alarms: the impact of alarm reliability, availability of alarm validity information and workload. Ergonomics, 1-23.
RagsdaleA.LewR.DyreB. P.BoringR. L. (2012). Fault Diagnosis with Multi-State Alarms in a Nuclear Power Control Simulator. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 2167-2171). Boston, MA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
14.
SorkinR.D.KantowitzB.H.KantowitzS.C. (1988). Likelihood alarm displays. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,30, 445-459.
15.
SorkinR. D.WoodsD. D. (1985). Systems with human monitors: A signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 49–75.
16.
SwetsJ. A. (1992). The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist, 47(4), 522-532.
17.
ThomasL. C.WickensC. D.RantanenE. M. (2003). Imperfect automation in aviation traffic alerts: A review of conflict detection algorithms and their implications for human factors research. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 344-348). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18.
WiczorekR.ManzeyD. (2014). Supporting Attention Allocation in Multitask Environments Effects of Likelihood Alarm Systems on Trust, Behavior, and Performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19.
WiczorekR.ManzeyD.ZirkA. (2014). Benefits of Decision-Support by Likelihood versus Binary Alarm Systems: Does the number of stages make a difference? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58, 380-384. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
