The Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) regulations apply to many household products that may cause substantial personal injury or illness as a result of customary or foreseeable use. This article examines a warning on an FHSA-regulated hazardous product involved in a fatality and discusses how the warning would have been more effective had the FHSA, and the product labeling, followed guidelines provided by the American National Standards Institute Z535.4 standard for Product Safety Signs and Labels. The article concludes with a call to update the FHSA with information from current warning research and standards that, if implemented in FHSA labeling requirements for manufacturers, would lead to more effective warnings.
References
1.
AdamsA.S.EdworthyJ. (1995). Quantifying and predicting the effects of basic text display variables on the perceived urgency of warning labels: Tradeoffs involving font size, border weight and colour. Ergonomics, 38, 2221-2237.
2.
ANSI (2011). ANSI Z535.4, American National Standard for Product Safety Signs and Labels. New York: American National Standards Institute.
3.
BraunC.C.HoltR.S.SilverN.C. (1995). Adding consequence information to product instructions: Changes in hazard perceptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp. 346–350).
4.
BraunC.C.SilverN.C.(1995). Interaction of signal word and colour on warning labels: Differences in perceived hazard and behavioural compliance. Ergonomics. 38(11), 2207-2220.
5.
CPSC (2012). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Chapter II, Subchapter C Federal Hazardous Substance Act Regulations, Part 1500: Hazardous Substances and Articles; Administration and Enforcement Regulations.
6.
DesaulniersD.R. (1987). Layout, organization, and the effectiveness of consumer product warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 56-60).
7.
FHSA (1960). Federal Hazardous Substances Act. Public Law 86-613, 74 Stat. 372, Section 2(p), section q(1)(B), section 4(a). 15 USC 1261-1278.
8.
FHSA (1973). Federal Hazardous Substances Act Regulations. 16 CFR Part 1500, Hazardous Substances and Articles; Administration and Enforcement Regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. CPSC.
9.
FrantzJ.P. (1993). Effect of location and presentation format on attention to and compliance with product warnings and instructions. Journal of Safety Research, 24, 131–154.
10.
GodfreyS.S.LaugheryK.R.YoungS.L.VaubelK.P.BrelsfordJ.W.LaugheryK.A.HornE. (1991). The new alcohol warning labels: How noticeable are they?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 446-450).
11.
KalsherM.J.WogalterM.S.PucciS.RacicotB.M. (1994). Enhancing the perceived readability of pharmaceutical container labels and warnings: The use of alternative designs and pictorials. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 384–388).
12.
LaugheryK.R.Sr.VaubelK.P.YoungS.L.BrelsfordJ.W.RoweA.L. (1993). Explicitness of consequence information in warnings. Safety Science, 16, 597–613.
13.
NemireK. (2014). The hidden hazard of an invisible flame. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting (pp. 1869-1873).
14.
OtsuboS.M. (1988). A behavioral study of warning labels for consumer products: Perceived danger and use of pictographs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 536-540).
15.
RashidR.WogalterM.S. (1997). Effects of warning border color, width, and design on perceived effectiveness. In DasB.KarwowskiW. (Eds.), Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety II (pp. 455-456). Louisville, KY: IOS Press.
16.
RogersW.A.LamsonN.RousseauG.K. (2000). Warning research: An integrative perspective. Human Factors, 42, 102-139.
17.
SilverN.C.BraunC.C. (1995). Perceived readability of warning labels with varied font sizes and styles. Safety Science, 16, 615-625.
18.
SilverN.C.KlineP.B.BraunC.C. (1994). Type form variables: Differences in perceived readability and perceived hazardousness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 821-825).
19.
VanderplasJ.M.VanderplasJ.H. (1980). Some factors affecting legibility of printed materials for older adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 923-932.
20.
WogalterM.S.ConzolaV.C.Smith-JacksonT.L. (2002). Research- based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Applied Ergonomics33, 219–230.
21.
WogalterM.S.GodfreyS.S.FontenelleG.A.DesaulniersD.R.RothsteinP.R.LaugheryK.R.Sr. (1987). Effectiveness of warnings. Human Factors, 29, 599–612.
22.
WogalterM.S.KalsherM.J.RacicotB.M. (1992). The influence of location and pictorials on behavior compliance to warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1029–1033).
23.
WogalterM.S.MagurnoA.B.ScottK.L.DietrichD.A. (1996). Facilitating information acquisition for over-the counter drugs using supplemental labels. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 732–736).
24.
WogalterM.S.VigilanteW.J.Jr. (2003). Effects of label format on knowledge acquisition and perceived readability by younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 46(4), 327-344.
25.
WogalterM.S.YoungS.L. (1994). Enhancing warning compliance through alternative product label designs. Applied Ergonomics, 25, 53-57.
26.
WogalterM.S.YoungS.L. (1998). Using a hybrid communication/human information processing model to evaluate beverage alcohol warning effectiveness. Applied Behavioral Sciences Review, 6, 17-37.
27.
YoungS. (1991). Increasing the noticeability of warnings: Effects of pictorial, color, signal icon and border. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 580-584). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
28.
YoungS.L.WogalterM.S. (1990). Comprehension and memory on instructional manual warnings: Conspicuous print and pictorial icons. Human Factors, 32, 637-649.
29.
YoungS.L.WogalterM.S. (1998). Relative importance of different verbal components in conveying hazard-level information in warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1063–1067).
