In this paper, we describe an ongoing exploratory study investigating human mental models of tactical robot movement under different combinations of mission commands, constraints, and environmental features. In particular, we are assessing the relationship between participants’ mental models of robot form and their expectations for robot movement. The results of this study will inform the design of future experimentation with a soldier population and the design of tactical robot movement behaviors. Due to data collection being in its early stages, findings will be presented at the 2015 HFES Annual Meeting.
References
1.
AndersonJ. R.BothellD.ByrneM. D.DouglassS.LebiereC.QinY. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036-1060. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036
BroadbentE.LeeY. I.StaffordR. Q.KuoI. H.MacDonaldB. A. (2011). Mental schemas of robots as more human-like are associated with higher blood pressure and negative emotions in a human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(3), 291-297. doi:10.1007/s12369-011-0096-9
4.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.ConverseS. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In CastellanN. J.Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current Issues (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.TannebaumS. I.SalasE.VolpeC.E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In GuzzoR.SalasE. (Eds.), team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp.333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
ChristianC. (2014). Impact of a robotic teammate’s appearance on a human’s reliance on and perceived knowledge of the robot. Paper session presented at the Florida Student Conference for Human Factors and Applied Psychology, Daytona Beach, Florida.
7.
DraganA. D.LeeK. C. T.SrinivasaS. S. (2013). Legibility and predictability of robot motion. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 301-308). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HRI.2013.6483603
8.
JianJ.-Y.BisantzA. M.DruryC. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53-71. doi:10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
9.
KieslerS.GoetzJ. (2002). Mental models of robotic assistants. CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 576-577. doi:10.1145/506443.506491
10.
LeeS. S.LauI.KieslerS.ChiuC. (2005). Human mental models of humanoid robots. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2767-2772. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570532
11.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2000). Influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283. doi:10.I037t/0021-9010.85.2.273
12.
OsoskyS. (2013). Influence of task-role mental models on human interpretation of robot motion behavior (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando.
13.
OsoskyS.PhillipsE.SchusterD.JentschF. (2013). A picture is worth a thousand mental models: Evaluating human understanding of robot teammates. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1298-1302. doi:10.1177/1541931213571287
14.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230-253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886
15.
PhillipsE.OsoskyS.GroveJ.JentschF. (2011). From tools to teammates: Toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1491-1495. doi:10.1177/1071181311551310
16.
PhillipsE.OsoskyS.JentschF. (2014). An investigation of human decision-making in a human-robot team task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 315-319. doi:10.1177/1541931214581065
17.
RouseW. B.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 22(6), 1296-1308. doi:10.1109/21.199457
18.
RouseW. B.MorrisN. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349-363. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
19.
SimsV. K.ChinM. G.SushilD. J.BarberD. J.BallionT.Clark…FinkelsteinN. (2005). Anthropomorphism of robotic forms: A response to affordances?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(3), 602-605. doi:10.1177/154193120504900383
20.
StoutR. J.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.MilanovichD. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(1), 61-71. doi:10.1518/001872099779577273
