Problem Solving with Color: Color’s Effect on Affect and Problem Solving with Subgoal Labels

Abstract

For some students, particular concepts are difficult to understand (Berch & Mazzocco, 2007). Catrambone (1998) identified subgoal labeling as a catalyst for remedying barriers to understanding complex concepts. This study builds on Margulieux and Catrambone’s (2016) research, which examined the effects of subgoal labeling on computer-programming tasks by investigating how performance is impacted by color priming for affective states. Materials used were displayed with red, blue, and green backgrounds as primers. Two control groups with black and no-color backgrounds were used for comparison. The results suggest that color priming did not significantly enhance or inhibit performance. However, there was evidence to suggest that green may be a reliable primer for affect and mood, but not enough to suggest that it be used more than other colors (as evidenced by significant results for the control group). More research should be conducted to examine potential contributing factors for the trends found in this study.

References

Berch

D. B.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

(2007). Why is math so hard for some children?: The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

Bellizzi

J. A.

Hite

R. E.

(1992). Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psychology & Marketing, 9(5), 347–363.

Brand

Reimer

Opwis

(2007). How do we learn in a negative mood? Effects of a negative mood on transfer and learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.002

Catrambone

(1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 355.

Elliot

A. J.

Payen

Brisswalter

Cury

Thayer

J. F.

(2011). A subtle threat cue, heart rate variability, and cognitive performance: Heart rate variability. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1340–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01216.x

Lichtenfeld

Elliot

A. J.

Maier

M. A.

Pekrun

(2012). Fertile green: Green facilitates creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 784–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212436611

Lichtenfeld

Maier

M. A.

Elliot

A. J.

Pekrun

(2009). The semantic red effect: Processing the word red undermines intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1273–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.003

Lobel

(2016). Sensation: The New Science of Physical Intelligence. Simon and Schuster: New York, NY.

Margulieux

L. E.

Catrambone

(2016). Improving problem solving with subgoal labels in expository text and worked examples. Learning and Instruction, 42, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.002

10.

Margulieux

L. E.

Catrambone

Guzdial

(2016). Employing subgoals in computer programming education. Computer Science Education, 26(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1144429

11.

Metha

Zhu

R. J.

(2009). Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performance. Science, 323, 1226–1229.

12.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

13.

Wenger

J. L.

Carlson

R. A.

(1996). Cognitive sequence knowledge: What is learned? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 599.

14.

Yazzie-Mintz

(2007). Voices of Students on Engagement: A Report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED495758