Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have the potential to increase driver safety. However, driver misuse or failure to use ADAS could mitigate potential benefits. Appropriate training is one established method for encouraging proper use of technology. An online survey of 2364 respondents revealed significant differences between utilized and preferred methods for learning to use technologies. Drivers who learned through their preferred methods reported higher understanding and use of in-vehicle systems. Providing readily available methods of learning that align with learning preferences may improve safe use of ADAS.
References
1.
AbrahamH.SeppeltB.MehlerB.ReimerB. (2017). What’s in a Name: Vehicle Technology Branding & Consumer Expectations for Automation. Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’17), 226-234. DOI: 10.1145/3122986.3123018
2.
BraitmanK.McCarttA.ZubyD.SingerJ. (2010). Volvo and Infiniti Drivers’ Experiences with Select Crash Avoidance Technologies. Traffic Injury Prevention, 11(3), 270-278. DOI:10.1080/15389581003735600
FunkhouserK.TannerE.DrewsF. (2017). Know it by Name: Human Factors of ADAS Design. Poster, Automated Vehicles Symposium.
7.
HocJ.YoungM.BlossevilleJ. (2009). Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety. Theoretical Issues In Ergonomics Science, 10(2), 135-160. DOI:10.1080/14639220802368856
8.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2012). They’re Working: Insurance Claims Data Show Which New Technologies Are Preventing Crashes. Status Report, 47(5).
9.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2014). Rearview camera rule aims to reduce backover crashes. Status Report, 49(4).
10.
JermakianJ. (2011). Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 732-740. DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.020
11.
KoustanaïA.CavalloV.DelhommeP.MasA. (2012). Simulator Training with a Forward Collision Warning System. Human Factors: The Journal of The Human Factors And Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 709-721. DOI:10.1177/0018720812441796
McDonaldA.McGeheeD.ChryslerS.AskelsonN.AngellL.SeppeltB. (2016). National Survey Identifying Gaps in Consumer Knowledge of Advanced Vehicle Safety Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of The Transportation Research Board, 2559, 1-6. DOI:10.3141/2559-01
14.
MollenhauerM.DingusT.CarneyC.HankeyJ.JahnsS. (1997). Anti-lock brake systems: An assessment of training on driver effectiveness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29(1), 97-108. DOI:10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00065-6
PayreW.CestacJ.DangN.VienneF.DelhommeP. (2017). Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 216-227. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2017.02.001
TorkzadehG.AnguloI. (1992). The concept and correlates of computer anxiety. Behaviour & Information Technology, 11(2), 99-108. DOI:10.1080/01449299208924324
19.
TorkzadehG.Van DykeT. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers In Human Behavior, 18(5), 479-494. DOI:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00010-9
20.
TrübswetterN.BenglerK. (2013). Why Should I Use ADAS? Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and the Elderly: Knowledge, Experience and Usage Barriers. In The Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. Bolton Landing, New York.
