Methods of organizing menu structures have received considerable empirical attention. Studies have compared categorical and alphabetical organizations with conflicting results. This experiment examined the effects of these and other organization types on visual search performance with 64-item menus. The effect of target type was also assessed by comparing performance using explicit targets as stimuli with that obtained using target definitions. Categorical menu organization was found to be superior to an alphabetical ordering, particularly when definitions are provided as stimuli.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnardP.J.MortonJ.LongJ.B.OttleyE.A.Planning menus for display: Some effects of their structure and content on user performance. In Displays for Man-Machine Systems, Institution of Electrical Engineers, conference publication 150, 1977.
2.
CardS.K.User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus. Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, Gaithersburg, MD, March, 1982.
3.
LiebeltL.S.McDonaldJ.E.StoneJ.D.KaratJ.The effect of organization on learning menu access. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Seattle, WA, October, 1982.
4.
McDonaldJ.E.StoneJ.D.LiebeltL.S.KaratJ.Evaluating a method for structuring the user-system interface. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Seattle, WA, October, 1982.
5.
MillerD.P.The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Rochester, NY, October 1981.
6.
SchvaneveldtR.W.McDonaldJ.E.Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981, 7, 673–687.
