Muscle Strength Simulations Using the Articulated Total Body Model

Abstract

Further developments are presented on a dynamic three–dimensional strength model that may be useful for evaluating musculoskeletal stresses incurred during manual materials handling tasks. The model being developed is a modification of the Articulated Total Body (ATB) Model originally developed by Calspan Corp. for the study of human body dynamics during automobile crashes. Refinements were introduced by Freivalds and Kaleps (1984) to account for a human neuromusculature. Further refinements now include orderly recruitment patterns, differential motor units, active state function and fatigue. Simulations of squat lifting and level running were performed with the ATB Model. Both of these cases indicate the potential of a muscularized three–dimensional biomechanical model to simulate human responses in a variety of conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aghazadeh

Ayoub

M. M.

(1985). “A comparison of dynamic- and static–strength models for prediction of lifting capacity,” Ergonomics, 28:1409–1417.

Ayoub

M. M.

Bethea

N. J.

Deivanayagam

Asfour

S. S.

Bakken

G. M.

Liles

D. H.

Mital

Sherif

(1978). “Determination and modeling of lifting capacity,” Final Report, Dept. of HEW, Grant #NI0SH IR010H0–545–01S014 and 5R010H–0054–02.

Bawa

Mannard

Stein

R. B.

(1976). “Predictions and Experimental Tests of a Viscoelastic Muscle Model Using Elastic and Inertial Loads,” Biol. Cybernetics 22, 139–145.

Chaffin

D. B.

(1975). “Ergonomics guide for the assessment of human static strength,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 36:505–510.

R. I.

(1972). “Dynamic Properties of Mammalian Skeletal Muscles,” Physiol. Rev., 52:129–196.

Freivalds

Kaleps

(1983). “Modelling of Active Neuromuscular Response to Dynamic Mechanical Stresses,” Proceedings of the Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp. 196–198.

Freivalds

Kaleps

(1984). “Computer–Aided Strength Prediction Using the Articulated Total Body Model,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 8:107–118.

Fleck

J. T.

Butler

F. E.

(1975). Development of an Improved Computer Model of the Human Body and Extremity Dynamics, AFAMRL–TR–75–14, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.

Fleck

J. T.

Butler

F. E.

(1982). “Validation of the Crash Victim Simulator,” Final Report No. ZS–5881–V–4, Calspan Corp., 4 Vols.

10.

Fleck

J. T.

Butler

F. E.

Vogel

S. L.

(1974). “An Improved Three Dimensional Computer Simulation of Motor Vehicle Crash Victims,” Final Technical Report No. ZQ–51 80–L–1, Calspan Corp., 4 Vols.

11.

Garg

Chaffin

D. B.

(1975). “A biomechanical computerized simulation of human strength,” AIIE Trans., 7:1–10.

12.

Hatze

(1981). Myocybernetic Control Models of Skeletal Muscle, University of South Africa, Pretoria.

13.

Henneman

Olson

C. B.

(1965). “Relations Between Structure and Function in Design of Skeletal Muscle,” J. Neurophysiol., 28:581–598.

14.

Keyserling

W. M.

Herrin

G. H.

Chaffin

D. B.

Armstrong

T. J.

Foss

M. L.

(1980). “Establishing an Industrial Strength Testing Program,” American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 41:730–736.

15.

Menon

Freivalds

(1985). “Repeatability of Dynamic Strength Tests,” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, pp. 517–520.

16.

Milner-Brown

H. S.

Stein

R. B.

Yemm

(1973). “The Orderly Recruitment of Human Motor Units During Voluntary Isometric Contractions,” J. Physiol., 230:359–370.

17.

Mital

(1983). “The Psychophysical Approach in Manual Lifting – A Verification Study,” Human Factors, 25:485–491.

18.

Pytel

J. L.

Kamon

(1981). “Dynamic Strength Test as a Predictor for Maximal and Acceptable Lifting,” Ergonomics, 24:662–663.

19.

Snook

S. H.

(1978). “The Design of Manual Handling Tasks,” Ergonomics, 21:963–985.

20.

Stephens

J. A.

Usherwood

T. P.

(1977). “The Mechanical Properties of Human Motor Units with Special Reference to Their Fatigability and Recruitment Threshold,” Brain Res., 125:91–97.