This paper discusses how computer technology has improved police performance. Automated criminal history systems provide complete histories of criminals, thereby improving arrest rates and the adjudication, process. Automated fingerprint identification systems have had a significant impact in the area of criminalistics. Computer simulation has aided the police in manpower allocation, workload requirements, and training programs. Robots are being used by the police for bomb disposal, and are being considered for patrol duties, special surveillance situations, and in prisons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BannerC.S.StockR.M. (1975). The FBI's approach to automatic fingerprint identification. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 44, 24.
2.
BurackerCD.StoverW.K. (1984). Automated fingerprint identification: Regional application of technology. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 53, 1–5.
3.
CaldwellJ. (1984). Mobile computer terminals. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 53, 21–24.
4.
DalrympleB.E.DuffJ.M.MenzelE.R. (1977). Inherent fingerprint luminescence-Detection by laser. Journal of Forensic Science, 22.
FlammangC.J.WalkerR.O. (1981). Instructional application of computer based education in police training. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 9, 224–230.
9.
HilmarJ. (1985). Microcomputer modelling and probabilities: Valuable tools for patrol workload analysis. Police Chief, April, 31–33.
10.
JohnsonD.W. (1979). The new low cost microcomputer planning systems for police resource allocation. Law and Order, May, 22–33.
11.
LevinsonM.R. (1983). Lasers shed new light on fingerprints. Police, May, 55–58.
12.
LipsettF.R.ArnoldJ.G. (1974). Computer simulation of patrol operations of a semi-rural police force. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 2, 190–207.
13.
MainhardtR. (1970). The stun gun: Anon-lethal weapon. Law and Order, Oct., 86–66.
14.
MaynardM.M. (1972). Computerized information system is a major ally for Nashville Metropolitan Area Police. Law and Order, April, 65–68.
15.
MoenssensA.A. (1971). Fingerprint techniques. Philadelphia: Chilton Book Co.
16.
MurphyJ.K. (1980). The polygraph technique: Past and present. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 49, 1–5.
17.
NashE.W.TosiO.I. (1971). Identification of suspects by the voiceprint technique. Police Chief, Dec., 49–51.
18.
ParsonsK. (1974). Safety slug: The name of the game is “shock”. Law and Order, October, 8–44.
19.
PitchessP.J. (1971). New computer based dispatching system cuts response time. Police Chief, February, 8.
20.
RidgelyJ.E. (1985). Latent print detection by laser. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 54, 1–8.
21.
RobinsonW. (1985). Deputy-chief, San Antonio Police Department, Personal communication.
22.
SparrowM.K. (1982). Digital coding of single fingerprints: A new approach for the computer age. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10, 206–217.
23.
SwearengenT. (1972). The gas gun in riot control. Law and Order, May, 38–44.
24.
WaterfieldJ.J. (1977). Computer aided dispatch. Law and Order, February, 32–36.
25.
WilkensonT. (1984). The use of computers in police training. Police Chief, April.
26.
WilliamsM. (1971). Body armor and its applications to police work. Law and Order, July, 72–75.
27.
WilliamsM. (1973). An evaluation of bullet proof vests for police. Law and Order, October, 42–47.
28.
ZurawskiJ.J. (1979). Computer expedites identification of arrested persons. Law and Order, December, 40–44.
