Flexibility in Resource Allocation and the Performance of Time-Sharing Tasks

Abstract

The extent and nature of the ability to control the allocation of mental resources between the components of a dual task was investigated in three separate experiments. Using a variable priority (demand) methodology it was found that subjects could manipulate their performance level, however their ability to meet specific demand levels was limited. Training subjects under single or dual-task conditions using a wide range of task demand significantly improved dual task performance and degree of control over resource allocation as compared to performance following practice under a narrow range of task demands or under single task fixed demand conditions. Single task performance among all groups improved to the same degree. It was concluded that training subjects under a wide range of task demands increases the range of performance levels over which mental resources can be flexibly allocated for those tasks and improves time sharing performance. Implications for the design of training for complex task performance are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brickner

(1981). Improving time-sharing performance by enhancing voluntary control on processing resources.” Doctoral thesis, Haifa: Technion.

Damos

D. L.

(1977) Development and transfer of time-sharing skills. ARL University of Illinois at Urbana, ARL-77-11/AFOSR-77-10 July 1977.

Gopher

(1980). On the training of time sharing skills: An attention viewpoint. Proceeding of the Human Factors Society 24th annual meeting.

Gopher

Eilam

(1979). Development of the latter-shape keyboard: A new approach to the design of data entry devices. Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the Human Factors Society.

Gopher

Navon

(1980). How is performance limited testing the notion of central capacity. Aacta Psychologia. 46, 161–180.

Gopher

North

R.A.

(1974). The measurement of attention capacity through concurrent task performance with individual difficulty levels and shifting priorities. Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the Human Factors Society.

Gopher

Spitz

(1982). Human ability to control the allocation of resources. Technion, Israel Human Engineering Laboratory. HEIS-82-9 1982.

Kahneman

(1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Navon

Gopher

(1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

10.

Norman

D.A.

Bobrow

D.J.

(1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 44–64.

11.

North

R.A.

Gopher

(1974). Basic attention measures as predictors of success in flight training. Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the Human Factors Society.

12.

Schneider

Fisk

A.D.

(1982). Automatic and controlled visual search: Can processing occur without cost? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition. 8, 261–278.

13.

Schneider

Shiffrin

R.W.

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Decision research and attention, Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

14.

Wickens

C.D.

Tsang

P.S.

Benel

R.A.

(1979) “The allocation of attentional resources in a dynamic environment.” — Proceedings of the Human Factors Society — 23rd annual meeting.