This pilot study investigated the relative effectiveness of various navigational aids for navigating through both hierarchical and hypertext database structures. Previous research has suggested that subjects perform more efficiently when using a spatial map of hierarchical structure. Similar data are not available for hypertext structures. The results of the present pilot study suggest that more in-depth investigation is required to judge the relative merits of the various aids for differing database structures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BillingsleyP.A. (1982). Navigation through hierarchical menu structures: does it help to have a map? In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society- 26th Annual Meeting (pp. 103–107). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
2.
DownsR.M.SteaD. (1973). Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In: Image and Environment (Eds.) DownsR.M.SteaD. (pp. 8–26). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
3.
EkstromR.B.FrenchJ.W.HarmanH.H.DermenD. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests (NR 150 329). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4.
ElmW.C.WoodsD.D. (1985). Getting lost: a case study in interface design. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society-29th Annual Meeting (pp. 927–931). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
5.
SoderstonCandace (1986) A study of spatial models and human navigation within complex computer interfaces. An unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
6.
ThorndykeP.W.StaszC. (1980). Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 137–175.
7.
WebbJ.M.KramerA.F. (1987). Learning hierarchical menu systems: a comparative investigation of analogical and pictorial formats In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 978–982). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
