Individual Differences in Strategic Processing in a Dynamic Spatial Reasoning Task

Abstract

A previous study of dynamic spatial reasoning using a two-object arrival time task (Law et. al., 1990) suggested that individual differences in strategic processes might account for a significant portion of overall accuracy on the task. Specifically, some subjects appear to favor a decision strategy that favors distance information while disregarding speed information. Four experiments examining individual differences in subject strategies on the arrival time task are reviewed. The results support the hypothesis that decision strategies are an important individual difference performance factor for the experimental task, and that these strategies are subject to modification and improvement via explicit feedback. The results also show that the ability to benefit from performance feedback is mediated by an individual's ability to make speed judgements like those called for by the arrival time task.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hunt

Pellegrino

J. W.

(1985). Using interactive computing to expand intelligence testing. Intelligence, 9, 207–236.

Hunt

Pellegrino

J. W.

Frick

R. W.

Farr

S. A.

Alderton

(1988). The ability to reason about movement in the visual field. Intelligence, 12, 77–100.

Kyllonen

P. C.

Lohman

D. F.

Snow

R. E.

(1984). Effects of aptitude, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 130–145.

Law

Pellegrino

J. W.

Mitchell

Fischer

MacDonald

Hunt

(1990). Dynamic spatial reasoning and information coordination: Factors governing performance in a two-object arrival time task. Manuscript in preparation.

Lohman

D. F.

(1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In Sternberg

R. J.

(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human development-Volume 4 (pp. 181–248). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Pellegrino

J. W.

Hunt

Yee

(1989). Assessment and modelling of information coordination abilities. In Kanfer

Ackerman

Cudek

(Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Abilities-motivation and methodology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pellegrino

J. W.

Hunt

E. B.

Abate

Farr

(1987). A computer-based test battery for the assessment of static and dynamic spatial reasoning abilities. Behavioral Research Methods. Instruments. & Computers. 19 (2), 231–236.

Pellegrino

J. W.

Kail

(1982). Process analyses of spatial aptitude. In Sternberg

R. J.

(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Volume 1 (pp. 311–366). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.