The Effects of Image Scale Factor on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation and Simulator Sickness in Head-Coupled Virtual Environments

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of virtual image scale factor on vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation and simulator sickness as a result of exposure to a head-coupled virtual interface. Subjects were exposed for 30 minutes, completing visual search tasks using active, unrestricted yaw head movement rotations. Three levels of image scale-factor changes (0.5X, 1.0X, 2.0X magnification) were explored. It was hypothesized that scale factors deviating from 1.0X magnification would cause VOR gain adaptation and increased simulator sickness. A secondary hypothesis predicted a moderate correlation between VOR gain adaptation and simulator sickness. Results demonstrated that significant VOR adaptation occurred only in the 0.5X and 2.0X scale conditions. VOR gain decreased an average of 15% in the 0.5X condition and increased an average of 6% in the 2.0X condition. Simulator sickness magnitudes in these two conditions were over twice that of the 1.0X condition. Only weak correlations were found between VOR gain adaptation and simulator sickness. Virtual interface design guidelines are suggested to minimize unwanted interface-generated effects on the user.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bles

de Graf

Bos

J.E.

Groen

(1997). Motion sickness: the provocative conflict, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Motion Sickness: Medical and Human Factors, Marbella, Spain, 26–27.

Bouyer

L.J.

Watt

D.G.

(1996). “Torso rotation” experiments I: Adaptation to motion sickness does not correlate with changes in VOR gain, J Vestib Res, 6 (5), 367–375.

Collewijn

Martins

A.J.

Steinman

R.M.

(1983). Compensatory eye movements during active and passive head movements: Fast adaptation to changes in visual magnification, J Physiol, 340, 259–286.

Danas

E.S.

(1995). Mapping auditory space onto visual space, Unpublished master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.

Demer

J.L.

(1992). Mechanisms of human vertical visual-vestibular interaction, J Neurophysiol, 68, 2128–46.

Demer

J.L.

Oas

J.G.

Baloh

R.W.

(1993). Visual-vestibular interaction in humans during active and passive vertical head movement, J Vest Res, 3, 101–114.

Draper

M.H.

(1998). The adaptive effects of virtual interfaces: vestibuloocular reflex and simulator sickness, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

Durlach

N.I.

Mavor

A.S.

(Eds.). (1995). Virtual Reality: Scientific and Technological Challenges, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Gordon

C.R.

Spitzer

Doweck

Shupak

Gadoth

(1996). The vestibulo-ocular reflex and seasickness susceptibility, J Vestib Res, 6, 229–233.

10.

Kennedy

R.S.

Lane

N.E.

Berbaum

K.S.

Lilienthal

M.G.

(1993). A simulator sickness questionnaire: A new method for quantifying simulator sickness, Int J Aviat Psych, 3, 203–220.

11.

Shelhamer

Tiliket

Roberts

Kramer

P.D.

Zee

D.S.

(1994). Short-term vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation in humans II. error signals, Exp Brain Res, 100, 328–336.