Background. Reorganization of the human motor cortex can be induced by specific patterns of peripheral afferent stimulation. The potential for afferent stimulation to facilitate the functional recovery associated with conventional rehabilitative techniques has not previously been investigated. Objective. The authors sought to determine whether combining appropriate afferent stimulation with task-specific training resulted in greater improvements than training alone in patients with impaired upper limb function in the subacute phase following stroke. Method. Twenty patients with hemiparesis due to stroke were allocated randomly to either a stimulation or control group. All received 9 sessions of task-specific physiotherapy training over 3 weeks. Prior to each training session, associative electrical stimulation of the motor point of 2 hand muscles was given in the stimulation group, whereas the control group received sham stimulation. Changes in dexterity were assessed using a grip-lift task, and standard measures of upper-limb function were made before and following the intervention. Corticospinal excitability was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results. Both groups showed comparable improvements in functional measures of upper-limb function. Of the 20 patients, only 14 could perform the grip-lift task, which is an objective measure of dexterity. Patients in the stimulation group From the Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of exhibited significantly greater improvements in this task than the control group. There was no significant change in corticospinal excitability in either group. Conclusion. This pilot study provides preliminary data suggesting that targeted afferent stimulation may facilitate the response to conventional rehabilitation in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke, but these results need to be confirmed in a larger scale study.
Olsen TSArm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21:247-251.
2.
Lai SM, Studenski S., Duncan PW, et al. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33:1840-1844.
3.
Nakayama H., Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1994;75:852-857.
4.
Gowland C., deBruin H., Basmajian J., et al. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther.1992;72:624-633.
5.
Richards L., Pohl P.Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function . Clin Geriatr Med.1999;15:819-832.
6.
van der Lee J., Wagenaar R., Lankhorst G., et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients. Results from a singleblind randomized clinical trial. Stroke.1999;30:2369-2375.
7.
Nakayama H., Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1994;75:394-398.
8.
Hermsdorfer J., Hagl E., Nowak DA, et al. Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clin Neurophysiol.2003 ;114:915-929.
9.
Ridding MC, Brouwer B., Miles TS, et al. Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res.2000; 131:135-143.
10.
Muellbacher W., Ziemann U., Boroojerdi B., et al. Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Exp Brain Res.2001;136:431-438.
11.
Garry MI, Kamen G., Nordstrom MAHemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning. J Neurophysiol.2004;91:1570-1578.
12.
Kaelin-Lang A., Luft AR, Sawaki L., et al. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol.2002;540:623-633.
13.
Nitsche MA, Paulus W.Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol.2000 ;527(Pt 3):633-639.
14.
Stefan K., Kunesch E., Cohen LG, et al. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain.2000;123 (Pt 3):572-584.
15.
McKay DR, Ridding MC, Thompson PD, Miles TSInduction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex . Exp Brain Res.2002;143:342-349.
16.
McDonnell MN , Ridding MCAfferent stimulation facilitates performance on a novel motor task. Exp Brain Res.2006 : 109-115.
17.
Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A., Lang N., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci.2003;15:619-626.
18.
Bütefisch CM , Khurana V., Kopylev L., et al. Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J Neurophysiol.2004;91:2110-2116.
19.
Muellbacher W., Richards C., Ziemann U., et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol.2002;59:1278-1282.
20.
Liepert J., Graef S., Uhde I., Leidner O., Weiller C.Training- induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients . Acta Neurol Scand.2000;101:321-326.
21.
Winstein CJ , Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2004;85:620-628.
22.
Page SJIntensity versus task-specificity after stroke: how important is intensity?Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:730-732.
23.
Jang SH, Kim YH, Cho SH, et al. Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Neuroreport.2003 ;14:137-141.
24.
Uy J., Ridding MC, Hillier S., et al. Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke?Neurology. 2003;61:982-984.
25.
Conforto A. , Kaelin-Lang A., Cohen L.Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol.2002;51: 122-125.
26.
Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LGInfluence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2006 ;87:351-357.
27.
Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M., et al. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery . 2006;58:464-473.
28.
Hummel F., Celnik P., Giraux P., et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128:490-499.
29.
Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N., et al. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005 ;65:466-468.
30.
Winstein C.Motor learning considerations in stroke rehabilitation . In: Duncan PW, Badke MB, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book Medical ; 1987:109-134.
31.
Ridding MC, Uy J.Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by paired associative stimulation . Clin Neurophysiol.2003;114: 1437-1444.
32.
Westling G., Johansson RSFactors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res.1984;53:277-284.
33.
McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Ridding MC, et al. Impairments in precision grip correlate with functional measures in adult hemiplegia. Clin Neurophysiol.2006 ;117:1474-1480.
34.
Duque J., Thonnard JL, Vandermeeren Y., et al. Correlation between impaired dexterity and corticospinal tract dysgenesis in congenital hemiplegia. Brain. 2003;126:732-747.
35.
Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A., et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1994; 91:79-92.
36.
Ridding MC, Rothwell JCStimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1997;105:340-344.
37.
Devanne H., Lavoie BA, Capaday C.Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway . Exp Brain Res.1997;114:329-338.
38.
Pitcher JB, Ogston KM, Miles TSAge and sex differences in human motor cortex input-output characteristics . J Physiol.2003;546:605-613.
39.
Lyle RCA performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483-492.
40.
Page SJ, Sisto S., Levine P., et al. Efficacy of modified constraintinduced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2004;85: 14-18.
41.
Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, et al. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain.2003;126:1430-1448.
42.
Taub E., Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1993; 74:347-354.
43.
Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring realworld arm use. Stroke. 2005;36:2493-2496.
44.
van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke.2004;35:1410-1414.
45.
McDonnell MN , Ridding MC, Flavel SC, et al. Effect of human grip strategy on force control in precision tasks. Exp Brain Res.2005;161:368-373.
46.
Pyndt HS, Ridding MCModification of the human motor cortex by associative stimulation. Exp Brain Res.2004;159:123-128.
47.
Lemon RN, Griffiths J.Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve.2005;32:261-279.
48.
Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, et al. Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res.2001;889:278-287.
49.
Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, et al. Physiological studies of the corticomotor projection to the hand after subcortical stroke. Clin Neurophysiol.1999;110:487-498.
50.
Traversa R. , Cicinelli P., Bassi A., et al. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke. 1997;28:110-117.
51.
Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, et al. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity. Clin Neurophysiol.2002;113:2025-2029.
52.
Pascual-Leone A., Grafman J., Hallett M.Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science. 1994;263:1287-1289.
53.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L., Leyman I., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med.1975;7:13-31.
