Validity of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury and Other Domains of Function in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Abstract

Objective. To demonstrate criterion (concurrent and predictive) and construct validity of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) scale and other walking measures in the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT). Design. Prospective multicenter clinical trial of a walking intervention for patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Participants/Methods. Body weight−supported treadmill training was compared to overground mobility training in 146 patients with incomplete SCI (C4 to L3) enrolled within 8 weeks of onset and treated for 12 weeks. Primary outcome measures were the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), 50-foot walking speed (50FW-S), and 6-minute walking distance (6MW-D), tested 3, 6, and 12 months after entry. Secondary measures were the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), WISCI, and FIM locomotor score (LFIM), assessed at 6 centers by blinded observers. Data for the 2 arms were combined since no significant differences in outcomes had been found. Results. Correlations with WISCI at 6 months were significant with BBS (r = .90), LEMS (r = .85), LFIM (r = .89), FIM (r = .77), 50FW-S (r = .85), and 6MW-D ( r = .79); similar correlations occurred at 3 and 12 months. Correlations of change scores from baseline WISCI were significant for change scores from baseline of LEMS/BBS/LFIM. Correlation of baseline LEMS and WISCI at 12 months were most significant (r = .73). The R ² of baseline LEMS explained 57% of variability of WISCI levels at 3 months. Conclusion. Concurrent validity of the WISCI scale was supported by significant correlations with all measures at 3, 6, and 12 months. Correlation of change scores supports predictive validity. The LEMS at baseline was the best predictor of the WISCI score at 12 months and explained most of the variance, which supported both predictive and construct validity. The combination of the LEMS, BBS, WISCI, 50FW-S, and LFIM appears to encompass adequate descriptors for outcomes of walking trials for incomplete SCI.

Keywords

Spinal cord injuries Ambulation Outcome assessment Validity

References

Patrick M. , Ditunno PL , Ditunno JF Jr. A comparison of spinal cord injury (SCI) consumers/staff preference for walking: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S41.

Dobkin BH , Apple D. , Barbeau H. , et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17(3):153-167.

Curt A. , Schwab ME , Dietz V. Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(1):1-6.

Steeves J. Outcome measures to be used during SCI clinical trials. International Campaign for Care and Cure of Paralysis (ICCP). 2006. Available at: http://www.icord.org/ICCP/ICCP_SCI_Guidelines2.doc. Accessed September 18, 2006.

Ditunno JF Jr , Ditunno PL , Graziani V. , et al. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(4):234-243.

Ditunno PL , Ditunno JF Jr. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord. 2001;39(12):654-656.

Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes From the Model Systems . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1995.

Kim CM , Eng JJ , Whittaker MW Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(3):156-162.

van Hedel HJ , Wirz M. , Dietz V. Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2):190-196.

10.

Dobkin B. , Barbeau H. , Deforge D. , et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the SCILT multi-center randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair . 2007;21(1):25-35.

11.

Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research . In: National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, ed. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1993.

12.

Dobkin B. , Apple D. , Barbeau H. , et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006 ;66(4):484-493.

13.

Singh R. , Hunter J. , Philip A. , et al. Predicting those who will walk after rehabilitation in a specialist stroke unit. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(2):149-152.

14.

Shaughnessy M. , Michael KM , Sorkin JD , et al. Steps after stroke: capturing ambulatory recovery. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1305-1307.

15.

Marino RJ , Barros T. , Biering-Sorensen F. , et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S50-S56.

16.

Bellamy N. , Wells G. , Campbell J. Relationship between severity and clinical importance of symptoms in osteoarthritis . Clin Rheumatol. 1991;10(2):138-143.

17.

Bracken MB , Shepard MJ , Holford TR , et al. Methylprednisolone or tirilazad mesylate administration after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow up—results of the third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(5):699-706.

18.

Steeves J. , Fawcett J. , Tuszynski M. Report of international clinical trials workshop on spinal cord injury February 20-21, 2004, Vancouver, Canada. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(10):591-597.

19.

Morganti B. , Scivoletto G. , Ditunno P. , et al. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): criterion validation. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(1):27-33.

20.

Wirz M. , Zemon DH , Rupp R. , et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):672-680.

21.

Ditunno JF Jr , Burns AS , Marino RJ Neurological and functional capacity outcome measures: essential to spinal cord injury clinical trials. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3 Suppl 1):35-41.

22.

Institute of Medicine. Functional limitations research in rehabilitation science and engineering. In: Brandt EN , Pope AM , eds. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997 : 100-146.

23.

Bracken MB , Shepard MJ , Collins WF , et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(20):1405-1411.

24.

Geisler FH , Dorsey FC , Coleman WP Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury—a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(26):1829-1838.

25.

Geisler FH , Coleman WP , Grieco G. , et al. Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26(24 Suppl):S68-S86.

26.

Geisler FH , Coleman WP , Grieco G. , et al. The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine. 2001;26(24 Suppl):S87-S98.

27.

Marino RJ , Graves DE Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1804-1810.

28.

Waters RL , Adkins R. , Yakura J. , et al. Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):756-760.

29.

Berg KO , Maki BE , Williams JI , et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(11):1073-1080.

30.

Berg KO , Wood-Dauphinee SL , Williams JI , et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument . Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7-S11.

31.

Whitney S. , Wrisley D. , Furman J. Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction. Physiother Res Int. 2003;8(4):178-186.

32.

Badke MB , Shea TA , Miedaner JA , et al. Outcomes after rehabilitation for adults with balance dysfunction . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):227-233.

33.

Stevenson TJ Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(1):29-38.

34.

Duncan P. , Studenski S. , Richards L. , et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9): 2173-2180.

35.

Mulroy S. , Gronley J. , Weiss W. , et al. Use of cluster analysis for gait pattern classification of patients in the early and late recovery phases following stroke. Gait Posture. 2003;18(1):114-125.

36.

Visintin M. , Barbeau H. , Korner-Bitensky N. , et al. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke. 1998;29(6):1122-1128.

37.

Pohl PS , Perera S. , Duncan PW , et al. Gains in distance walking in a 3-month follow-up poststroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(1):30-36.

38.

Dobkin BH

Short-distance walking speed and timed walking distance: redundant measures for clinical trials?

Neurology. 2006;66(4):584-586.

39.

Kelly JO , Kilbreath SL , Davis GM , et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and walking ability in subacute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(12):1780-1785.

40.

Guyatt GH , Sullivan MJ , Thompson PJ , et al. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985;132(8):919-923.

41.

ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111-117.

42.

Barbeau H. , Dobkin B. , SCILT Study Group. Comparison of velocities for a 15-meter and 6-minute walk over the first year in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury: the SCILT trial; 2007. Unpublished Work.

43.

Teixeira-Salmela LF , Nadeau S. , Mcbride I. , et al. Effects of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning training on temporal, kinematic and kinetic variables during gait in chronic stroke survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(2):53-60.

44.

Curt A. , Dietz V. Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(1):39-43.

45.

Waters RL , Yakura JS , Adkins R. , et al. Determinants of gait performance following spinal cord injury . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(12):811-818.

46.

Hussey RW , Stauffer ES Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1973;54(12):544-547.

47.

Ware JE Jr , Keller SD , Hatoum Hat , et al. The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): I. Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Med Care. 1999;37(5 Suppl): MS40-MS50.

48.

Lee CE , Simmonds MJ , Novy DM , et al. Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(2):227-231.

49.

Bilek LD , Venema DM , Camp KL , et al. Evaluation of the human activity profile for use with persons with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(5):756-763.

50.

Cramer SC Trial of Ropinirole in motor recovery after stroke. NIH Clinical Trials site ; 2005. Available at: http://www.clinical-trials.gov/ct/search . Accessed May 10, 2006.

51.

Kim MO , Marino RJ , Burns AS Comparison of the self-selected to maximal levels of the Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) [Abstract]. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(2):161-162.

52.

van Hedel HJ , Wirz M. , Curt A. Improving walking assessment in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury: responsiveness. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(6):352-356.

53.

Demers C. , McKelvie RS , Negassa A. , et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2001;142(4):698-703.

54.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Agranov E. , et al. SCIM—spinal cord independence measure—a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(12):850-856.

55.

Cardenas DD , Hoffman JM , Kirshblum S. , et al. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1757-1763.

56.

Haubert LL , Gutierrez DD , Newsam CJ , et al. A comparison of shoulder joint forces during ambulation with crutches versus a walker in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(1):63-70.

57.

Melis EH , Torres-Moreno R. , Barbeau H. , et al. Analysis of assisted-gait characteristics in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999;37(6):430-439.

58.

Ulkar B. , Yavuzer G. , Guner R. , et al. Energy expenditure of the paraplegic gait: comparison between different walking aids and normal subjects. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26(3):213-217.

59.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Tesio L. , et al. A multi-center international study on the Spinal Cord Independence measure, Version III: Rasch Psychometric Validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(4):275-291.