Changes in Activity After a Complete Spinal Cord Injury as Measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II)

Abstract

Background. The assessment of rehabilitation efficacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) should be based on a combination of neurological and functional outcome measures. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II) is an independence scale that was specifically developed for subjects with SCI. However, little is known about the changes in SCIM II scores during and after rehabilitation. Objective. The aims of this study were to evaluate changes in functional recovery during the first year after a complete SCI as measured by the SCIM II compared with neurological recovery (motor scores according to the American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA]). Methods. SCIM II data and ASIA motor scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injury (derived from the database of the European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury) of 64 patients with complete paraplegia and 36 patients with complete quadriplegia were analyzed. Results. In patients with complete paraplegia, the SCIM II total score improved significantly during the 1-year follow-up, even after discharge from rehabilitation. In contrast, the ASIA motor scores showed little recovery. In patients with quadriplegia, functional and motor recovery developed in parallel during rehabilitation and after discharge. Conclusions. The SCIM II is responsive to functional changes in patients with a persistent motor complete SCI. It is clinically useful for monitoring functional improvement during rehabilitation and after discharge. The SCIM II and the clinical examination based on the ASIA protocol are of complementary value and separately describe changes in independence and sensorimotor deficits in SCI patients.

Keywords

Assessment Recovery Spinal Cord Independence Measure

References

Anonymous. Clinical assessment after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:S21-S29.

American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia. International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, Revised 1996. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association; 1996.

Keith RA , Granger CV , Hamilton BB , Sherwin FS The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation . Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18.

Dodds TA , Martin DP , Stolov WC , Deyo RA A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:531-536.

Ottenbacher KJ , Hsu Y. , Granger CV , Fiedler RC The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226-1232.

Meiners T. , Böhm V. , Schlüter E. Analysis of FIM data collected during hospital treatment of patients with acute spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation. 2004;43:129-136.

Middleton JW , Harvey LA , Batty J. , Cameron I. , Quirk R. , Winstanley J. Five additional mobility and locomotor items to improve responsiveness of the FIM in wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:495-504.

Yavuz N. , Tezyürek M. , Akyüz M. A comparison of two functional tests in quadriplegia: the quadriplegia index of function and the functional independence measure. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:832-837.

Middleton J. , Truman G. , Geraghty T. Neurological level effect on the discharge functional status of spinal cord injured persons after rehabilitation . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1428-1432.

10.

Marino RJ , Huang M. , Knight P. , Herbison GJ , Ditunno JF , Segal M. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM). Paraplegia. 1993;31:225-233.

11.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Agranov E. , Ring H. , Tamir A. SCIM-spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997 ;35:850-856.

12.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Steinberg F. , et al. The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. Disabil Rehabil. 2001 ;23:263-268.

13.

Marino RJ , Rider-Forster D. , Maissel G. , Ditunno JH Superiority of motor level over single neurological level in categorizing tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1995;33:510-513.

14.

Ota T. , Akaboshi K. , Nagata M. , et al. Functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the motor score and the Functional Independence Measure. Spinal Cord. 1996;34: 531-535.

15.

Waters RL , Yakura JS , Adkins RH , Sie I. Recovery following complete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1992;73:784-789.

16.

Waters RL , Adkins RH , Yakura JS , Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:242-247.

17.

Dawson-Saunders B. , Trapp R. Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON, Canada : Prentice Hall International; 1994.

18.

Chan SCC , Chan APS. Rehabilitation outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in a tertiary spinal cord injury centre: a comparison with an international standard. Spinal Cord. 2005 ;43:489-498.

19.

Hall KM , Cohen M. , Wright J. , Call M. , Werner P. Characteristics of the functional independence measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1471-1476.

20.

Cardenas D. , Hoffmann J. , Kirshblum S. , McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:1757-1763.

21.

Bracken M. , Holford TH Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III . J Neurosurg. 2002;96:259-266.

22.

Müslümanoglu L. , Aki S. , Oeztürk Y. , et al. Motor, sensory and functional recovery in patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:386-389.

23.

Salisbury S. , Low Choy N. , Nitz J. Shoulder pain, range of motion and functional motor skills after acute tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2003;84:1480-1485.

24.

Salisbury S. , Nitz J. , Souvlis T. Shoulder pain following tetraplegia: a follow-up study 2-4 years after injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44: 723-728.

25.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Tesio L. , et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III. Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:275-291.