Rehabilitation of Reaching and Grasping Function in Severe Hemiplegic Patients Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy of a therapeutic intervention based on functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy to improve reaching and grasping function after severe hemiplegia due to stroke. Methods. A total of 21 subjects with acute stroke were randomized into 2 groups, FES plus conventional occupational and physiotherapy (FES group) or only conventional therapy (control group) 5 days a week for 12 to 16 weeks. A third group of 7 subjects with chronic hemiplegia (at least 5 months poststroke) received only FES therapy (chronic group) and pre—post training changes were compared. FES was applied to proximal and then distal muscle groups during specific motor tasks. At baseline and at the end of treatment, grasping function was assessed using the Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory Hand Function Test, along with more standard measures of rehabilitation outcome. Results. The FES group improved significantly more than the control group in terms of object manipulation, palmar grip torque, pinch grip pulling force, Barthel Index, Upper Extremity Fugl—Meyer scores, and Upper Extremity Chedoke—McMaster Stages of Motor Recovery. The chronic stroke subjects demonstrated improvements in most categories, but the changes were not statistically significant. Conclusions. FES therapy with upper extremity training may be an efficacious intervention in the rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function during acute stroke rehabilitation.

Keywords

Hemiplegia Rehabilitation Grasping Reaching Functional electrical stimulation Upper extremity

References

Cirstea CM , Ptito A. , Levin MF Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1237-1242.

Wolf SL , Winstein CJ , Miller JP , et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial . JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.

Dobkin BH Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:3-13.

Wolf SL , Winstein CJ , Miller JP , Blanton S. , Clark PC , Nichols-Larsen D. Looking in the rear view mirror when conversing with back seat drivers: the EXCITE trial revisited. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:379-387.

Pang MY , Harris JE , Eng JJ A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1-9.

Kwakkel G. , Kollen B. , Krebs H. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:111-121.

Merians AS , Poizner H. , Boian R. , Burdea G. , Adamovich S. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:252-267.

Popovic MR , Thrasher TA , Zivanovic V. , Takaki J. , Hajek V. Neuroprosthesis for retraining reaching and grasping functions in severe hemiplegic patients. Neuromodulation. 2005;8:58-72.

Popovic MR , Thrasher TA Neuroprostheses. In: Wnek GE , Bowlin GL , eds. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 2004:1056-1065.

10.

Glanz M. , Klawansky S. , Stason W. , Berkey C. , Chalmers TC Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1996;77:549-553.

11.

Rushton DN Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation- an hypothesis. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:75-78.

12.

Popovic MB , Popovic DB , Sinkjaer T. , Stefanovic A. , Schwirtlich L. Restitution of reaching and grasping promoted by functional electrical therapy . Artif Organs. 2002;26:271-25.

13.

Francisco G. , Chae J. , Chawla H. , et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:570-575.

14.

Cauraugh JH , Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke. 2002;33:1589-1594.

15.

Alon G. , McBride K. , Ring H. Improving selected hand functions using a noninvasive neuroprosthesis in persons with chronic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;11:99-106.

16.

Alon G. , Ring H. Gait and hand function enhancement following training with a multi-segment hybrid-orthosis stimulation system in stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12:209-216.

17.

Ring H. , Rosenthal N. Controlled study of neuroprosthetic functional electrical stimulation in sub-acute post-stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:32-36.

18.

Alon G. , Levitt AF , McCarthy PA Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:207-215.

19.

Sullivan JE , Hedman LD A home program of sensory and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with upper-limb task practice in a patient 5 years after a stroke. Phys Ther. 2004;84:1045-1054.

20.

Daly JJ , Hogan N. , Perepezko EM , et al. Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:723-736.

21.

Hedman LD , Sullivan JE , Hilliard MJ , Brown DM Neuromuscular electrical stimulation during task-oriented exercise improves arm function for an individual with proximal arm dysfunction after stroke . Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86: 592-596.

22.

Sullivan JE , Hedman LD Effects of home-based sensory and motor amplitude electrical stimulation on arm dysfunction in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:142-150.

23.

Santos M. , Zahner LH , McKiernan BJ , Mahnken JD , Quaney B. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves severe hand dysfunction for individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006;30:175-183.

24.

Gowland C. , Stratford P. , Ward M. , et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993;24:58-63.

25.

Parker VM , Wade DT , Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986;8:69-73.

26.

Dodds TA , Martin DP , Stolov WC , Deyo RA A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74: 531-536.

27.

Mahoney FI , Barthel DW Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.

28.

Fugl-Meyer AR , Jaasko L. , Leyman I. , Olsson S. , Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med . 1975;7: 13-31.

29.

Winstein CJ , Rose DK , Tan SM , Lewthwaite R. , Chui HC , Azen SP A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85: 620-628.

30.

Popovic MR , Keller T. , Pappas IP , Dietz V. , Morari M. Surface-stimulation technology for grasping and walking neuroprosthesis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2001;20:82-93.