Background. The objective of this study was to examine how surface electrical stimulation of trunk musculature influences the kinematic, kinetic, and metabolic characteristics, as well as shoulder muscle activity, during wheelchair propulsion. Methods. Eleven participants with spinal cord injury propelled their own wheelchairs on a dynamometer at a speed of 1.3 m/s for three 5-minute trials. During a propulsion trial, 1 of 3 stimulation levels (HIGH, LOW, and OFF) was randomly applied to the participant’s abdominal and back muscle groups with a surface functional electrical stimulation device. Propulsion kinetics, trunk kinematics, metabolic responses, and surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of 6 shoulder muscles were collected synchronously. Kinetic, kinematic, and EMG variables were recorded during 3 time intervals (30 seconds each) within a 5-minute trial. Metabolic variables were recorded through the entire 5-minute trial. Results. Participants with HIGH stimulation increased their gross mechanical efficiency (P = .05) during wheelchair propulsion. No differences were found in shoulder EMG activity, energy expenditure, and trunk motion between stimulation levels. Conclusion. Functional electrical stimulation on the trunk musculature has potential advantages in helping manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury improve propulsion efficiency without placing additional demands on shoulder musculature.
Powers CM, Newsam CJ, Gronley JK, Fontaine CA, Perry J.Isometric shoulder torque in subjects with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:761-765.
2.
van der Helm FC, Veeger HEQuasi-static analysis of muscle forces in the shoulder mechanism during wheelchair propulsion. J Biomech . 1996;29: 39-52.
3.
van der Woude LH, Veeger HE, Dallmeijer AJ, Janssen TW, Rozendaal LABiomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Phys. 2001;23:713-733.
4.
Mulroy SJ, Gronley JK, Newsam CJ, Perry J.Electromyographic activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion by paraplegic persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:187-193.
5.
Boninger ML, Towers JD, Cooper RA, Dicianno BE, Munin MCShoulder imaging abnormalities in individuals with paraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38:401-408.
6.
Dalyan M., Cardenas DD, Gerard B.Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord . 1999;37:191-195.
7.
Pentland WE, Twomey LTUpper limb function in persons with long term paraplegia and implications for independence: partI. Paraplegia. 1994 ;32:211-218.
8.
Vanlandewijck Y., Theisen D., Daly D.Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports. Sports Med. 2001;31:339-367.
9.
Dallmeijer AJ , van der Woude LH, Veeger HE, Hollander APEffectiveness of force application in manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77:213-221.
10.
Schantz P., Bjorkman P., Sandberg M., Andersen E.Movement and muscle activity pattern in wheelchair ambulation by persons with para- and tetraplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999;31:67-76.
11.
Beekman CE, Miller-Porter L., Schoneberger M.Energy cost of propulsion in standard and ultralight wheelchairs in people with spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther. 1999 ;79:146-158.
12.
Kulig K., Newsam CJ, Mulroy SJ, et al. The effect of level of spinal cord injury on shoulder joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:744-751.
13.
Newsam CJ, Mulroy SJ, Gronley JK, Bontrager EL, Perry J.Temporal-spatial characteristics of wheelchair propulsion. Effects of level of spinal cord injury, terrain, and propulsion rate. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75: 292-299.
14.
Finley MA, Rasch EK, Keyser RE, Rodgers MMThe biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion in individuals with and without upper-limb impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:385-395.
15.
Mulroy SJ, Farrokhi S., Newsam CJ, Perry J.Effects of spinal cord injury level on the activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion: an electromyographic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:925-934.
16.
Sinnott KA, Milburn P., McNaughton H.Factors associated with thoracic spinal cord injury, lesion level and rotator cuff disorders. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:748-753.
17.
Yang YS, Koontz AM, Triolo RJ, Mercer JL, Boninger MLSurface electromyography activity of trunk muscles during wheelchair propulsion . Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:1032-1041.
18.
Rice I., Koontz AM, Boninger ML, Cooper RAAn analysis of trunk excursion in manual wheelchair users. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 27th International RESNA Conference; June 20-22, 2004; Orlando, FL .
19.
Koontz AM, Boninger ML, Rice I., et al. Trunk movement patterns and propulsion efficiency in wheelchairs users with and without SCI. Paper presented at: American Society of Biomechanics 2004 Annual Meeting; September 8-11, 2004; Portland, OR.
20.
Parent F., Dansereau J., Lacoste M., Aissaoui R.Evaluation of the new flexible contour backrest for wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37: 325-333.
21.
Samuelsson KA , Tropp H., Nylander E., Gerdle B.The effect of rear-wheel position on seating ergonomics and mobility efficiency in wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41: 65-74.
22.
Triolo RJ, Yang YS, Koontz AM, et al. The effect of functional electrical stimulation during wheelchair propulsion. Paper presented at: XXth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics and 29th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics; August 1-5, 2005; Cleveland, OH.
23.
Kukke SN, Triolo RJThe effects of trunk stimulation on bimanual seated workspace. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004;12:177-185.
24.
Triolo RJ, Bevelheimer T., Eisenhower G., Wormser D.Inter-rater reliability of a clinical test of standing function. J Spinal Cord Med. 1995;18:14-22.
25.
Yarkony GM, Jaeger RJ, Roth E., Kralj AR, Quintern J.Functional neuromuscular stimulation for standing after spinal cord injury . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:201-206.
26.
Cooper RA, Robertson RN, VanSickle DP, Boninger ML, Shimada SDMethods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1997;34:162-170.
27.
Basmajian JV, Blumenstein R.Electrode Placement in EMG Biofeedback. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1980.
28.
Koontz AM, Cooper RA, Boninger ML, Yang Y., Impink BG, van der Woude LHA kinetic analysis of manual wheelchair propulsion during start-up on select indoor and outdoor surfaces. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:447-458.
29.
Boninger ML , Cooper RA, Shimada SD, Rudy TEShoulder and elbow motion during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: a description using a local coordinate system. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:418-426.
30.
Bursztein S.Energy Metabolism, Indirect Calorimetry, and Nutrition. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1989.
31.
van der Woude LH, Veeger HE, Rozendal RH, van Ingen Schenau G., Rooth F., van Nierop P.Wheelchair racing: effects of rim diameter and speed on physiology and technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20:492-500.
32.
Veeger D., van der Woude LH, Rozendal RHThe effect of rear wheel camber in manual wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1989;26:37-46.
33.
Veeger HE, van der Woude LH, Rozendal RHEffect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion . Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:100-107.
34.
An KNMuscle force and its role in joint dynamic stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002:S37-S42.
35.
Guo LY, Su FC, Wu HW, et al. Mechanical energy and power flow of the upper extremity in manual wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18:106-114.
36.
Boninger ML , Cooper RA, Robertson RN, Shimada SDThree-dimensional pushrim forces during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76:420-426.
37.
De Groot S. , Veeger DH, Hollander AP, Van der Woude LHWheelchair propulsion technique and mechanical efficiency after 3 wk of practice. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:756-766.
38.
Sanderson DJ , Sommer HJKinematic features of wheelchair propulsion . J Biomech. 1985;18:423-429.
39.
Gordon T., Mao J.Muscle atrophy and procedures for training after spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 1994;74:50-60.
40.
Kralj AR, Bajd T.Functional Electrical Stimulation: Standing and Walking After Spinal Cord Injury. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press ; 1989.
