Does Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop Strengthen Corticospinal Connections?

Abstract

Background. Long-term use of a foot-drop stimulator applying functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the common peroneal nerve improves walking performance even when the stimulator is off. This “therapeutic” effect might result from neuroplastic changes. Objective. To determine the effect of long-term use of a foot-drop stimulator on residual corticospinal connections in people with central nervous system disorders. Methods. Ten people with nonprogressive disorders (eg, stroke) and 26 with progressive disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis) used a foot-drop stimulator for 3 to 12 months while walking in the community. Walking performance and electrophysiological variables were measured before and after FES use. From the surface electromyogram of the tibialis anterior muscle, we measured the following: (1) motor-evoked potential (MEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex, (2) maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and (3) maximum motor wave (M_max) from stimulating the common peroneal nerve. Results. After using FES, MEP and MVC increased significantly by comparable amounts, 50% and 48%, respectively, in the nonprogressive group and 27% and 17% in the progressive group; the changes were positively correlated (R ² = .35; P < .001). Walking speed increased with the stimulator off (therapeutic effect) by 24% (P = .008) and 7% (P = .014) in the nonprogressive and progressive groups, respectively. The changes in M_max were small and not correlated with changes in MEP. Conclusions. The large increases in MVC and MEP suggest that regular use of a foot-drop stimulator strengthens activation of motor cortical areas and their residual descending connections, which may explain the therapeutic effect on walking speed.

Keywords

neuroplasticity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)multiple sclerosis stroke electromyogram (EMG)foot drop

References

Liberson WT , Holmquest HJ , Scott D. , Dow M. Functional electrotherapy, stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med. 1961;42:101-105.

Burridge J. , Taylor P. , Hagan S. , Swain I. Experience of clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator. Artif Organs. 1997;21:254-260.

Stein RB , Chong S. , Everaert DG , et al. A multicenter trial of a footdrop stimulator controlled by a tilt sensor. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ;20:371-379.

Wieler M. , Stein RB , Ladouceur M. , et al. Multi-center evaluation of electrical stimulation systems for walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:495-500.

Ladouceur M. , Barbeau H. Functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking for persons with incomplete spinal injuries: longitudinal changes in maximal overground walking speed. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32:28-36.

Petersen NT , Pyndt HS , Nielsen JB Investigating human motor control by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2003;152:1-16.

Rothwell JC Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;74:113-122.

Khaslavskaia S. , Ladouceur M. , Sinkjaer T. Increase in tibialis anterior motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve. Exp Brain Res. 2002;145:309-315.

Knash ME , Kido A. , Gorassini M. , Chan KM , Stein RB Electrical stimulation of the human common peroneal nerve elicits lasting facilitation of motor-evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res. 2003;221:366-377.

10.

Thompson AK , Stein RB Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked potentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles . Exp Brain Res. 2004;159:491-500.

11.

Thomas SL , Gorassini MA Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2844-2855.

12.

Stein RB , Everaert DG , Thompson AK , et al. Long-term therapeutic and orthotic effects of a foot drop stimulator on walking performance in progressive and nonprogressive neurological disorders . Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:152-167.

13.

Wassermann EM Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:1-16.

14.

van Hedel HJ , Murer C. , Dietz V. , Curt A. The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task. J Neurol. 2007;254: 1089-1098.

15.

Roy FD , Norton JA , Gorassini MA Role of sustained excitability of the leg motor cortex after transcranial magnetic stimulation in associative plasticity. J Neurophysiol . 2007;98:657-667.

16.

Thickbroom GW , Sacco P. , Faulkner DL , Kermode AG , Mastaglia FL Enhanced corticomotor excitability with dynamic fatiguing exercise of the lower limb in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2008;255:1001-1005.

17.

Devanne H. , Lavoie BA , Capaday C. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway . Exp Brain Res. 1997;114:329-338.

18.

Thompson AK , Estabrooks KL , Chong S. , Stein RB Spinal reflexes in ankle flexor and extensor muscles after chronic CNS lesions and functional electrical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:133-142.

19.

Davey NJ , Smith HC , Savic G. , Maskill DW , Ellaway PH , Frankel HL Comparison of input-output patterns in the corticospinal system of normal subjects and incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Exp Brain Res. 1999;127:382-390.

20.

Galea V. Changes in motor unit estimates with aging. J Clin Neurophysiol . 1996;13:253-260.

21.

McComas AJ , Galea V. , de Bruin H. Motor unit populations in healthy and diseased muscles. Phys Ther. 1993;73:868-877.

22.

Chen XY , Wolpaw JR Probable corticospinal tract control of spinal cord plasticity in the rat . J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:645-652.

23.

Chen XY , Wolpaw JR , Jakeman LB , Stokes BT Operant conditioning of H-reflex increase in spinal cord-injured rats. J Neurotrauma. 1999;16:175-186.

24.

Crone C. , Nielsen J. , Petersen N. , Ballegard M. , Hultborn H. Disynaptic reciprocal inhibition of ankle extensors in spastic patients. Brain. 1994;117:1161-1168.

25.

Rushton DN Neuroprostheses, Neuromodulators and Rehabilitation. London, UK: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine; 1997.

26.

Raymond CR LTP forms 1, 2 and 3: different mechanisms for the "long" in long-term potentiation . Trends Neurosci. 2007;30: 167-175.

27.

Rosenkranz K. , Rothwell JC Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:822-829.

28.

Butefisch C. , Davis B. , Wise S. , et al. Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3661-3665.

29.

Khaslavskaia S. , Sinkjaer T. Motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve depends on the voluntary drive. Exp Brain Res. 2005;162: 497-502.

30.

McKay DR , Ridding MC , Thompson PD , Miles TS Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143:342-349.

31.

Griffin L. , Cafarelli E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation during resistance training of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007;17:446-452.