Mirror neurons found in the premotor and parietal cortex respond not only during action execution, but also during observation of actions being performed by others. Thus, the motor system may be activated without overt movement. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke is often challenging due to severity of impairment and poor to absent voluntary movement ability. Methods in stroke rehabilitation based on the mirror neuron system—action observation, motor imagery, and imitation—take advantage of this opportunity to rebuild motor function despite impairments, as an alternative or complement to physical therapy. Here the authors review research into each condition of practice, and discuss the relevance of the mirror neuron system to stroke recovery.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.Report of the stroke progress review group: September 2006. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/find_people/groups/stroke_prg/09_2006_stroke_prg_report.htm. Updated June 5, 2009. Accessed October 27, 2009.
2.
Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S., Cote R., Durcan L., Carlton J.Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1035-1042.
3.
Winstein CJ , Wolf SLTask-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein J, Harvey R, Macko R, Winstein CJ , Zorowitz R , eds. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing;2008.
4.
Nudo RJMechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage . Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16: 638-644.
5.
Rizzolatti G.The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005;210:419-421.
6.
Aziz-Zadeh L. , Koski L., Zaidel E., Mazziotta J., Iacoboni M.Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2964-2970.
7.
di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G.Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res. 1992;91:176-180.
8.
Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G.Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 1996;119:593-609.
9.
Rizzolatti G. , Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L.Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3:131-141.
10.
Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., Rizzolatti G.Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study . J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:2608-2611.
11.
Fadiga L., Craighero L., Olivier E.Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action . Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:213-218.
12.
Aziz-Zadeh L. , Maeda F., Zaidel E., Mazziotta J., Iacoboni M.Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study. Exp Brain Res. 2002;144:127-131.
13.
Urgesi C., Moro V., Candidi M., Aglioti SMMapping implied body actions in the human motor system. J Neurosci. 2006;26: 7942-7949.
14.
Gangitano M. , Mottaghy FM, Pascual-Leone A.Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation. Neuroreport . 2001;12:1489-1492.
15.
Rizzolatti G., Craighero L.The mirror-neuron system. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-192.
16.
Grezes J., Decety J.Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp . 2001;12:1-19.
17.
Stefan K., Cohen LG, Duque J., et al. Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9339-9346.
18.
Classen J., Liepert J., Wise SP, Hallett M., Cohen LGRapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice . J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1117-1123.
19.
Celnik P., Stefan K., Hummel F., Duque J., Classen J., Cohen LGEncoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neuroimage. 2006;29:677-684.
20.
Celnik P., Webster B., Glasser DM, Cohen LGEffects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1814-1820.
21.
Dinstein I. , Hasson U., Rubin N., Heeger DJBrain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:1415-1427.
22.
Chong TT, Cunnington R., Williams MA, Kanwisher N., Mattingley JBfMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1576-1580.
23.
Gazzola V., Keysers C.The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:1239-1255.
24.
Grafton ST, Hamilton AFEvidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain . Hum Mov Sci. 2007;26:590-616.
25.
Hamilton AF , Grafton STAction outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19: 1239-1255.
26.
Iacoboni M. , Molnar-Szakacs I., Gallese V., Buccino G., Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G.Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e79.
27.
Hamilton AF , Grafton STGoal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1133-1137.
28.
Hesse MD, Sparing R., Fink GREnd or means: the "what" and "how" of observed intentional actions . J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21:776-790.
29.
Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschlager A., Prinz W.Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn. 2000 ;44:124-143.
30.
Pomeroy VM, Clark CA, Miller JSG, Baron J.-C, Markus HS, Tallis RCThe potential for utilizing the "mirror neurone system" to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: a review and hypothesis . Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:4-13.
31.
Buccino G., Vogt S., Ritzl A., et al. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron. 2004;42:323-334.
32.
Grezes J., Costes N., Decety J.Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a PET investigation. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 ;15:553-582.
33.
Grezes J., Costes N., Decety J.The effects of learning and intention on the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless actions. Brain. 1999;122:1875-1887.
34.
Frey SH, Gerry VEModulation of neural activity during observational learning of actions and their sequential orders. J Neurosci. 2006 ;26:13194-13201.
35.
Zentgraf K. , Stark R., Reiser M., et al. Differential activation of pre-SMA and SMA proper during action observation: effects of instructions. Neuroimage. 2005;26:662-672.
36.
Suchan B., Melde C., Herzog H., Homberg V., Seitz RJActivation differences in observation of hand movements for imitation or velocity judgement. Behav Brain Res. 2008 ; 188:78-83.
37.
Fagg AH, Arbib MAModeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping . Neural Netw. 1998;11:1277-1303.
38.
Arbib MA, Érdi P., Szentágothai J.Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
39.
Buccino G., Solodkin A., Small SLFunctions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation . Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19:55-63.
40.
Ertelt D., Small S., Solodkin A., et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007 ;36(suppl 2):T164-T173.
41.
Jeannerod M.Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14:S103-S109.
42.
Feltz DL, Landers DMThe effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis. J Sport Psychol. 1983;5:25-57.
43.
de Vries S. , Mulder T.Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: a critical discussion. J Rehabil Med. 2007 ;39:5-13.
44.
Oishi K., Kasai T., Maeshima T.Autonomic response specificity during motor imagery. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2000;19:255-261.
45.
Pascual-Leone A., Dang N., Cohen LG, Brasilneto JP, Cammarota A., Hallett M.Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor-skills. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74: 1037-1045.
46.
Munzert J., Lorey B., Zentgraf K.Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Rev. 2009 ;60:306-326.
47.
Sharma N., Pomeroy VM, Baron J.-C. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006;37: 1941-1952.
48.
Kasess CH, Windischberger C., Cunnington R., Lanzenberger R., Pezawas L., Moser E.The suppressive influence of SMA on M1 in motor imagery revealed by fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage. 2008;40:828-837.
49.
Leonard G., Tremblay F.Corticomotor facilitation associated with observation, imagery and imitation of hand actions: a comparative study in young and old adults. Exp Brain Res. 2007;177:167-175.
50.
Cicinelli P. , Marconi B., Zaccagnini M., Pasqualetti P., Filippi MM, Rossini PMImagery-induced cortical excitability changes in stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:247-253.
51.
Sharma N., Simmons LH, Jones PS, et al. Motor imagery after subcortical stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2009;40:1315-1324.
52.
Sirigu A., Duhamel JR, Cohen L., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y.The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science. 1996;273:1564-1568.
53.
Johnson SHImagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics . Neuroreport. 2000;11:729-732.
54.
Johnson SH, Sprehn G., Saykin AJIntact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: evidence for activity-independent action representations. J Cogn Neurosci . 2002 ; 14:841-852.
55.
Gregg M., Hall C., Butler A.The MIQ-RS: a suitable option for examining movement imagery ability [Epub ahead of print: DOI 10.1093/ecam/nem170.]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med.
56.
Malouin F., Richards C., Jackson P., Lafleur M., Durand A., Doyon J.The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20-29.
57.
Simmons L., Sharma N., Baron JC, Pomeroy VMMotor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair . 2008;22:458-467.
58.
Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, Hui-Chan CWMental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ;85:1403-1408.
59.
Page SJ, Levine P., Sisto S., Johnston MVA randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke . Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:233-240.
60.
Page SJ, Levine P., Leonard A.Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2007;38:1293-1297.
61.
Page SJ, Levine P., Leonard ACEffects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:399-402.
62.
Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T., Wade DTThe effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:842-852.
63.
Zimmermann-Schlatter A., Schuster C., Puhan MA, Siekierka E., Steurer J.Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008 ;5:8.
64.
Page SJImagery improves upper extremity motor function in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Occup Ther J Res. 2000;20:200-215.
65.
Page SJ, Levine P., Sisto SA, Johnston MVMental practice combined with physical practice for upper-limb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2001 ;81:1455-1462.
66.
Butler AJ, Page SJMental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2006;87(12 suppl 2): S2-S11.
67.
Page SJ, Szaflarski JP, Eliassen JC, Pan H., Cramer SCCortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ;23:382-388.
68.
Mulder T.Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation . J Neural Transm. 2007;114: 1265-1278.
69.
Iacoboni M.Neural mechanisms of imitation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:632-637.
70.
Miall RCConnecting mirror neurons and forward models. Neuroreport . 2003;14:2135-2137.
71.
Haruno M., Wolpert DM, Kawato M.Hierarchical MOSAIC model for movement generation. Int Congr Ser. 2003;1250: 575-590.
72.
Haruno M., Wolpert DM, Kawato M.Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput. 2001;13: 2201-2220.
73.
Wolpert DM, Doya K., Kawato M.A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction . Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 ;358:593-602.
74.
Aziz-Zadeh L., Ivry RBThe human mirror neuron system and embodied representations. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629: 355-376.
75.
Iacoboni M. , Woods RP, Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G.Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science. 1999;286:2526-2528.
76.
Koski L., Wohlschlager A., Bekkering H., et al. Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cereb Cortex. 2002 ;12:847-855.
77.
Heiser M., Iacoboni M., Maeda F., Marcus J., Mazziotta JCThe essential role of Broca’s area in imitation. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:1123-1128.
78.
Molnar-Szakacs I., Iacoboni M., Koski L., Mazziotta JCFunctional segregation within pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus: evidence from fMRI studies of imitation and action observation. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:986-994.
79.
Rumiati RI, Weiss PH, Tessari A., et al. Common and differential neural mechanisms supporting imitation of meaningful and meaningless actions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:1420-1431.
80.
Milner AD, Goodale MAThe Visual Brain in Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press;1995.
81.
Hurley S.The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behav Brain Sci. 2008;31:1-22; discussion 58.
82.
Holden MKVirtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:187-211.
83.
Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A.Hand motor recovery after stroke: tuning the orchestra to improve hand motor function. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006 ;19:21-33.
84.
Krakauer JWMotor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:84-90.
85.
Mattar AA, Gribble PLMotor learning by observing. Neuron. 2005;46:153-160.
86.
Cross ES, Kraemer DJ, Hamilton AF, Kelley WM, Grafton STSensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:315-326.
87.
Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WDFunctional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130(pt 1): 170-180.
88.
Stinear CM, Fleming MK, Barber PA, Byblow WDLateralization of motor imagery following stroke. Clin Neurophysiol . 2007;118:1794-1801.
89.
Tretriluxana J., Gordon J., Fisher BE, Winstein CJHemisphere specific impairments in reach-to-grasp control after stroke: effects of object size. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:679-691.
90.
Hamzei F., Liepert J., Dettmers C., Weiller C., Rijntjes M.Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage. 2006;31: 710-720.
91.
Miyai I., Suzuki T., Kang J., Volpe BTImproved functional outcome in patients with hemorrhagic stroke in putamen and thalamus compared with those with stroke restricted to the putamen or thalamus. Stroke. 2000;31:1365-1369.
92.
Holmes P., Calmels C.A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. J Mot Behav. 2008;40: 433-445.
93.
Calvo-Merino B., Glaser DE, Grezes J., Passingham RE, Haggard P.Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15: 1243-1249.
94.
Olsson CJ, Jonsson B., Larsson A., Nyberg L.Motor representations and practice affect brain systems underlying imagery: an FMRI study of internal imagery in novices and active high jumpers . Open Neuroimag J. 2008;2:5-13.
