Cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training are promising approaches for improving cognition in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Identifying heterogeneity of change and factors that influence the effects of cognitive rehabilitation and/or exercise training on cognitive outcomes at the individual level have direct relevance for developing tailored and optimized rehabilitation interventions for improving cognition in progressive MS.
Objective
This study involved a secondary data analysis from the CogEx trial in progressive MS. This study first described heterogeneity of change in cognitive processing speed (CPS) across the intervention conditions and then identified possible adherence/compliance, baseline performance, and demographic/clinical variables as correlates of rehabilitation-related CPS changes.
Methods
A total of 311 persons with progressive MS who were pre-screened for impaired CPS completed 12 weeks of combined cognitive rehabilitation (or sham) and exercise training (or sham). CPS was measured before and after the 12-week period. As potential correlates of CPS changes, we measured adherence/compliance (ie, treatment exposure), performance outcomes at baseline, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline.
Results
There was heterogeneity of change in CPS across the 4 intervention conditions. We further identified baseline learning and memory impairment and premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ), but not adherence/compliance, other baseline performance outcomes, or demographic/clinical characteristics as significant correlates of CPS changes across the 4 intervention conditions.
Conclusions
The overall pattern of results suggests that future trials in this area might account for impaired learning and memory and/or premorbid IQ as potential covariates, or more carefully consider the role of reserve within rehabilitation interventions in progressive MS.
RuanoLPortaccioEGorettiB, et al. Age and disability cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis across disease subtypes. Mult Scler. 2017;23(9):1258-1267.
2.
FeinsteinAFreemanJLoAC.Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: what works, what does not, and what is needed. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:194-207.
3.
FeinsteinAFAmatoMPBrichettoG, et al. Study protocol: improving cognition in people with progressive multiple sclerosis: a multi-arm, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of cognitive rehabilitation and aerobic exercise (COGEx). BMC Neurology. 2020;20(1):204.
4.
FeinsteinAAmatoMPBrichettoG, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation and aerobic exercise for cognitive impairment in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (CogEx): a multi-arm randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol2023;22(10):912-924.
5.
KraemerHCFrankEKupferDJ.Moderators of treatment outcomes: clinical, research, and policy importance. JAMA. 2006;296(10):1286-1289.
6.
ChiaravallotiNDDeLucaJ.The influence of cognitive dysfunction on benefit from learning and memory rehabilitation in MS: a sub-analysis of the MEMREHAB trial. Mult Scler. 2015;21(12):1575-1582.
7.
SandroffBMBairdJFSilveiraSL, et al. Response heterogeneity in fitness, mobility, and cognitive outcomes with multimodal exercise training in persons with MS. Acta Neurol Scand. 2019;139:183-191.
8.
MotlRWBollaertRESandroffBM.Validation of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire classification coding system using accelerometry in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63(1):77-82.
9.
MessinisL.Is the RehaCom cognitive rehabilitation software effective in treating cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis?EC Neurol ECO. 2017;1:16-18.
10.
ChiaravallotiNDMooreNBNikelshpurOM, et al. An RCT to treat learning impairment in multiple sclerosis: the MEMREHAB trial. Neurology. 2013;81(24):2066-2072.
11.
BarrettCLMannGETaylorPN, et al. A randomized trial to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation and therapeutic exercise on walking performance for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2009;15(4):493-504.
12.
SmithA.Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Western Psychological Services; 1982.
13.
BairdJFMotlRW.Response heterogeneity with exercise training and physical activity interventions among persons with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(1):3-14.
14.
MotlRWCaseyBLearmonthYC, et al. The MoXFo initiative - adherence: exercise adherence, compliance and sustainability among people with multiple sclerosis: an overview and roadmap for research. Mult Scler. 2023;29(13):1595-1603.
15.
GoldmanMDMarrieRACohenJA.Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Mult Scler. 2008;14:383-390.
16.
DelisDCKramerJHKaplanE, et al. California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II). Psychological Corporation; 2000.
17.
BenedictRHB. The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised (BVMT-R). Psychosocial Assessment Resources; 1997.
18.
LangdonDWAmatoMPBoringaJ, et al. Recommendations for brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler. 2012;18(6):891-898.
19.
SasakiJESandroffBMBammanMM, et al. Motion sensors in multiple sclerosis: narrative review and update of applications. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(11):891-900.
20.
KurtzkeJF.Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444-1452.
21.
AmtmannDBamerAmNoonanV, et al. Comparison of the psychometric properties of two fatigue scales in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57(2):159-166.
22.
SullivanMJEdgleyKDehouxE. A survey of multiple sclerosis: I. perceived cognitive problems and compensatory strategy use. Can J Rehab. 1990;4(2):99-105.
23.
HobartJRiaziALampingDL, et al. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003;60(1):31-36.
24.
DozoisDJADobsonKSAhnbergJL. A psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychol Assessment. 1998;10(2):83.
25.
ZigmondASSnaithRP.The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361-370.
26.
HobartJLampingDFitzpatrickR, et al. The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain. 2001;125(Pt 5):962-973.
27.
CellaDFDineenKArnasonB, et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology. 1996;47(1):129-139.
28.
CohenJ.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
29.
BenjaminiYHochbergY.Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple esting. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289-300.
30.
AustinPCSteyerbergEW.The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:627-636.
31.
KochMWMostertJRepovicP, et al. Is the Symbol Digit Modalities Test a useful outcome in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis?Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(6):2115-2120.
32.
LezakMD.Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press; 2004.
33.
PatelVPWalkerLASFeinsteinA.Deconstructing the symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis: the role of memory. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;17:184-189.
34.
JacobsenCZivadinovRMyhrK-M, et al. Brain atrophy and clinical characteristics predicting SDMT performance in multiple sclerosis: a 10-year follow-up study. Mult Scler Exp Transl Clin. 2021;7:2055217321992394.
35.
SandroffBMSchwartzCEDeLucaJ.Measurement and maintenance of reserve in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2016;263: 2158-2169.
36.
VanceDECroweM.A proposed model of neuroplasticity and cognitive reserve in older adults. Activ Adapt Aging. 2006;30(3):61-79.
37.
HoltzerRChoiJMotlRW, et al. Individual reserve in aging and neurological disease. J Neurol. 2023;270(6):3179-3191.
38.
MotlRWSandroffBMDeLucaJ.Exercise training and cognitive rehabilitation: a symbiotic approach for rehabilitating walking and cognitive functions in multiple sclerosis?Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(6):499-511.
39.
MattioliFStampatoriCZanottiD, et al. Efficacy and specificity of intensive cognitive rehabilitation of attention and executive functions in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2010;288(1-2):101-105.
40.
BonavitaSSaccoRDella CorteM, et al. Computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation improves cognitive performances and induces brain functional connectivity changes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: an exploratory study. J Neurol. 2015;262(1):91-100.
41.
SandroffBMBaltoJMKlarenRE, et al. Systematically-developed pilot randomized controlled trial of exercise and cognition in persons with multiple sclerosis. Neurocase. 2016;22(5):443-450.
42.
SandroffBMWenderCLAWeberEWellsGMotlRW.Feasibility of remotely delivered and supported aerobic walking exercise training for cognitive processing speed impairment in fully-ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;74:104709.
43.
AzevedoCJCenSYKhadkaS, et al. Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:223-234.
44.
ChiaravallotiNDCostaSLMooreNB, et al. The efficacy of speed of processing training for improving processing speed in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol. 2022;269(7):3614-3624.
45.
SandroffBMMotlRWReedWR, et al. Integrative CNS plasticity with exercise in MS: the PRIMERS (PRocessing, Integration of Multisensory Exercise-Related Stimuli) conceptual framework. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(10):847-862.
