Statistical Modeling of Combat Mortality Events by Using Subject Matter Expert Opinions and Operation Iraqi Freedom Empirical Results from the Navy-Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry

Abstract

In 12 Navy—Marine Corps medical logistics studies and analyses conducted by the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) and Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) over the past 5 years, estimates of battlefield mortality have been a major metric of interest to medical planners. An ongoing concern is how mortality is related to delays in treatment for medical logistics reasons. In this paper, we describe how NHRC and TBE have been developing a statistically based model for mortality since 2003, first starting with panel results from a group of military medical doctors and continuing here with an analysis of empirical injury data from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). The panel results and statistical analysis of life-threatening injury data in OIF from early 2004 to mid-2006 indicate that the Weibull distribution describes the timing of high risk of mortality events in a reasonable manner within surgical medical treatment facilities. The quest for a best-fitting probability distribution with parameters dependent on the casualty flow chain of treatment and evacuation in the theater is ongoing. In reality, combining analytical and subject matter expert (SME) results to model mortality is necessary given the breadth of theater medical delivery systems and general paucity of adequate empirical data in many of the segments of patient flow.

Keywords

combat mortality Navy—Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry statistical modeling Weibull probability distribution

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tropeano A. , Daly T. , Pang G. , Konoske P. System Documentation for Estimating Supplies Program (ESP). Technical Report No. 01-1A, Naval Health Research Center , San Diego, CA, 2001.

von Tersch R. , Gupta R. , Tyner C. et al. Using modeling and simulation to examine the benefits of medical technology in a simulated combat environment. J Defense Model Sim 2008; 5(3): 1-20.

Konoske P. Medical modeling and simulation: from data to planning tools. Briefing prepared for Joint Health Planners Conference, Newport News, VA, 6 August 2008.

Galarneau M. , Mitchell R. Determining Subject Matter Expert (SME) Based Mortality Curves for Use in NHRC’s Tactical Medical Logistics (TML) Planning Tool, Presentation to MD SME Panel, 1 November 2003.

Mitchell R. , Galarneau M. , Konoske P. et al. Modeling Dynamic Casualty Mortality Curves in the Tactical Medical Logistics (TML+) Planning Tool. Technical Report No. 04-31, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, 2004.

Galarneau M. , Mitchell R. Modeling dynamic casualty mortality curves in the Tactical Medical Logistics (TML+) planning tool. Presentation at 72nd MORSS, Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey, CA, 23 June 2004.

Mitchell R. , Galarneau M. Simulating dynamic mortality within the military medical chain of evacuation and treatment. Society of Computer Simulation, Spring Conference, Huntsville, AL, 2006 .

Mellor M. , Mitchell R. , Tucci J. A casualty flow model for US Marine Corps medical systems analysis. MORS Symposium , US Air Force Academy, Colorado , 20-22 June 2000.

Galarneau M. , Hancock W. , Konoske P. , et al. US Navy- Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry Operation Iraqi Freedom-1 Preliminary Findings. Technical Report TR No. 04-20, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, 2004.

10.

Pang G. CTR Data File TBE_080320_f1, Excel file from NHRC, 20 March 2008.

11.

Mitchell R. , Parker J. , Galarneau M. , et al. An Empirical Analysis of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Time-Based Combat Mortality Using the Navy-Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry (NMC-CTR) with a Comparison to Subject Matter Expert Estimates. Technical Report No. 09-33, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, 2009.

12.

Mitchell R. , Konoske P. , Brock J. et al. Ship to Objective Maneuver: Medical Analysis Using the NHRC Tactical Medical Logistics Planning Tool in Support of the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab. Technical Report TR No. 05-33, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, 2005.

13.

Elandt-Johnson R. , Johnson N. Survival Models and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1980.

14.

Lowe D. , Hill M. , Galarneau M. Review of Patient Conditions and Associated Mortality Classifications as Used in the TML+ Planning Tool. NHRC/ TBE Technical Note, March 2008.

15.

Aylward M. Rapid prototyping of wireless tools for polling groups, a case study . Presentation at 72nd MORSS, Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey, CA, 23 June 2004 .

16.

Baker S. , O'Neill B. , Haddon W. et al. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187-196.

17.

Gross A. , Clark V. Survival Distributions: Reliability Applications in the Biomedical Sciences . New York: Wiley, 1975.

18.

Nelson W. Applied Life Data Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1982.

19.

NHRC/TBE Developing a Statistically Based Model for Battlefield Casualty Mortality by OIF Empirical Patient Encounter Records from the Navy-Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry (NMC CTR). NHRC/TBE Technical Interchange Meetings , 12 December 2006, 24 April 2007, 13 March 2008, 15 April 2008, 7 October 2008.

20.

SYSTAT®, Statistics III, SYSTAT Software, Inc., Richmond, CA, 2004, www.systat.com.

21.

Draper N. , Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1966.

22.

Von Alven W (ed.). Reliability Engineering. Arinc Research Corp/ Prentice-Hall, 1964.

23.

Singpurwalla N. An interactive PC-based procedure for reliability assessment incorporating expert opinion and survival data. JASA 1988; 83: 43-51.

24.

Singpurwalla N. Predicting Damage. In Lindqvist B , Doksum K (eds), Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Reliability. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 2003; pp. 267-281.

25.

Keller-McNulty A. , Wilson A. 21st century reliability. In Lindqvist B , Doksum K (eds), Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Reliability. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 2003; pp. 15-29.