An air-to-ground combat survivability model

Abstract

A survivability model can be a useful component of a tactical support system able to aid fighter pilots to assess the risk of getting hit by enemy fire from ground-based threats. This work identifies three desirable properties of such a model: it should allow for evaluating actions; it should enable domain experts to incorporate their knowledge; and it should represent uncertainties both regarding the locations of the threats as well as their future actions. A survivability model is suggested, which calculates the probability that the aircraft can fly a route unharmed and allows for routes of different lengths to be compared. A domain expert can describe the threats by specifying the risk of getting hit at a position of the route without having to consider the earlier actions of the aircraft and the threats. Three different threat models are suggested and compared. The influence of uncertainties regarding the positions of the threats is studied by calculating the probability density function for the survivability. Different representations that take into account both the uncertainty regarding the present and future situation are discussed. The results indicate that the suggested survivability model could be a useful component of a future tactical support system, even though some further development is needed.

Keywords

survivability model fighter aircraft tactical support system uncertainty ground-based threats

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks

Lizza

. Pilot’s associate: a cooperative, knowledge-based system application. IEEE Expert 1991; 6: 18–29.

Rouse

Geddes

Hammer

. Computer-aided fighter pilots. IEEE Spectr 1990; 27: 38–41.

Joubert

. The copilote electronique project: first lessons as explanatory development starts. In: proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on human-computer teamwork, 1995, pp.167–172.

Hesselink

. On-board decision support through the integration of advanced information processing and human factors techniques: the POWER project. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, 2001. Paper presented at the RTO Lecture Series on “Tactical Decision Aids and Situational Awareness”.

Roy

. From data fusion to situation analysis. In: proceedings of the 4th international conference on information fusion, Montreal, Canada, 2001.

Endsley

. Situation awareness: the future of aviation systems. In: proceedings of the Saab 60th anniversary symposium, Linköping, Sweden, 1997.

Waag

Bell

. Situation assessment and decision making in skilled fighter pilots. In: Zsambok

Klein

(eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 1997, pp.247–254.

Schulte

. Mission management and crew assistance for military aircraft – cognitive concepts and prototype evaluation. ESG - Elektroniksystem - und Logistik –GmbH Advanced Avionics Systems, 2001. Paper presented at the RTO Lecture Series on “Tactical Decision Aids and Situational Awareness”.

Soban

Mavris

. Methodology for assessing survivability tradeoffs in the preliminary design process. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, San Diego, CA 2000.

10.

Helldin

. Situational adapting system supporting team situation awareness. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2010; 78330S-1 – 78330S-10.

11.

Eertink

. Self protection EW manager, prototype development and demonstration. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, 2003.

12.

Costa

. The fighter aircraft’s autodefense management problem: a dynamic decision network approach. Master’s thesis, George Mason University, 1999.

13.

Virtanen

Hämäläinen

Mattila

. Team optimal signaling strategies in air combat. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 2006; 36: 643–660.

14.

Randleff

. Decision support system for fighter pilots. Doctoral thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2007.

15.

Hall

. Path planning and autonomous navigation for use in computer generated forces. Master’s thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2007.

16.

Winstrand

. Mission planning and control of multiple UAVs. Stockholm: System Technology Division, Swedish Defence Research Agency, 2004.

17.

Roux

van Vuuren

. Threat evaluation and weapon assignment decision support: a review of the state of the art. ORION 2007; 23: 151–187.

18.

Liebhaber

Feher

. Air threat assessment: research, model, and display guidelines. In: proceedings of the 2002 command and control research technology symposium, 2002.

19.

Liebhaber

Smith

. Naval air defense threat assessment: cognitive factors and model. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego, CA 2000.

20.

Coradeschi

Karlsson

Törne

. Intelligent agents for aircraft combat simulation. In: proceedings of the 6th conference on computer generated forces and behavioral representation, 1996.

21.

Helldin

Falkman

. Human-centred automation of threat evaluation in future fighter aircraft. In: proceedings of informatik 2011, lecture notes in informatics (LNI P-192), 2011.

22.

Oberkampf

. Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2004; 85: 11–19.

23.

OpenStreetMap, http://www.openstreetmap.org (accessed 21 January 2013).

24.

Erlandsson

. Modeling fighter aircraft mission survivability. In: proceedings of the 14th international conference on information fusion. Chicago, IL, 2011, pp.1038–1045.

25.

Erlandsson

. Situation analysis for fighter aircraft combat survivability. Örebro University, School of Science and Technology, Örebro, Sweden 2011.

26.

Ball

. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design. New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1985.

27.

Mavris

DeLaurentis

. An integrated approach to military aircraft selection and concept evaluation. In: proceedings of the 1st AIAA aircraft engineering technology, and operations congress, 1995.

28.

Zheng

. Evolutionary route planner for unmanned air vehicles. IEEE Trans Rob 2005; 21: 609–620.

29.

Erlandsson

Niklasson

. Uncertainty measures for sensor management in a survivability application. In: proceedings of informatik 2011, lecture notes in informatics (LNI P-192), 2011.

30.

Erlandsson

Niklasson

. Comparing air mission routes from a combat survival perspective. In: proceedings of the 26th international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference, 2013.