Mathematical modeling of strategic behavior: the Battle of Midway,1942

Abstract

In this paper, an innovative discrete dynamical model is presented, which is used to predict the kind of strategic behavior the participants should adopt to win a battle. For study purposes, a computer model is developed to reveal the most critical factors that strategically affect combat and the relationship of dependence between the warring parties. Besides, it can predict the outcome of a battle under specific scenarios. Furthermore, the proposed dynamical system is applied in Midway’s air–naval battle, which was one of the most decisive battles of World War II (WWII). It was a significant turning point in the history of naval warfare in the Pacific Ocean since the victory of the United States marked an end to Japanese expansionist policy, and these are the reason this battle was chosen. The numerical results of the analysis were presented, and the key factors (e.g., persons, decisions, and weather conditions represented by the critical values of model parameters) were highlighted, defining the outcome of the conflict.

Keywords

Modeling and simulation a combat discrete dynamical systems Battle of Midway

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kasım

Çavdar

Nacar

et al. Modeling and simulation as a service for joint military space operations simulation. J Defence Model Simul Appl Method Technol 2021; 18: 9882499.

Richardson

LF.

Arms and insecurity: a mathematical study of the causes and origins of war. Pittsburgh, PA: Boxwood; Chicago, IL: Quadrangle, 1960.

Kress

Lanchester models for irregular warfare. Mathematics 2020; 8: 737.

Intriligator

Brito

DL.

Formal models of arms races. J Peace Sci 1976; 2: 77–88.

Intriligator

Brito

DL.

Can Ann’s races lead to the outbreak of war?

J Conflict Resol 1984; 28: 63–84.

Saperstein

MA.

Chaos in models of arms races and the initiation of war: crisis stability and instability in an international system. Complexity 2007; 12: 22–26.

Shumov

Korepanov

VO.

Game-theoretic models of battle action. Mat Teor Igr Pril 2021; 13: 80–117.

Coram

Noakes

The dynamics of asymmetric interactions: some insights from formal theory and Richardson models. Dyn Asymmet Conflict 2011; 4: 33–51.

Reuveny

Maxwell

Davis

Dynamic winner-take-all conflict. Defen Peace Econ 2011; 22: 471–492.

10.

Ishida

An initial condition game of Richardson’s arms race model. Sociol Theor Meth 2015; 30: 37–50.

11.

You

Chen

et al. Arms race analysis using capability-based graph model for conflict resolution. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), Banff, AB, Canada, 5–8 October 2017, vol. 2017, pp. 3602–3607. New York: IEEE.

12.

Founta

Zachilas

Dynamical systems theory compared to game theory: the case of the Salamis’s battle. Appl Math 2021; 12: 882–899.

13.

Lykke

AF.

Defining military strategy. Milit Rev 1989; 1989: 69.

14.

Miller

Rogers

Park

et al. On strategy as ends, ways, and means. Parameters 2017; 47: 14.

15.

Ebadizadeh

Lezgi

Mathematical modeling of the strategy of the early Islamic wars using game theory with emphasis on the Battle of Siffin. Ann Optim Theor Pract 2019; 2: 1–13.

16.

Lezgi

Nemati

AH.

Mathematical modeling of the strategy of the battle of Siffin. Ann Optim Theor Pract 2020; 3: 53–64.

17.

Mantovani

Berni

Visualizing strategy: a conceptual framework for the analysis and teaching of the conduct of war. Defen Stud 2020; 20: 373–389.

18.

Lorenz

The problem of deducing the climate from the governing equations. Tellus 1964; 16: 1–11.

19.

Malthus

An essay on the principle of population. London: Joseph Johnson, 1798.

20.

Gilad

Pecht

Tishler

Intelligence, cyberspace, and national security. Defen Peace Econ 2021; 32: 18–45.

21.

Stille

Howard

Midway 1942: turning point in the Pacific. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2010.

22.

Polymilis

Servezi

Skokos

A quantitative bifurcation analysis of Hénon-like 2D maps. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 1996; 66: 365–385.

23.

Lord

Incredible victory: the battle of Midway. New York: Open Road Media, 2012.

24.

Salavrakos

A re-assessment of the Japanese armaments production during World War II. Defen Peace Econ 2018; 29: 871–885.

25.

O’Neil

. Interwar U.S. and Japanese national product and defence expenditure. Alexandria, VA: CNA Corporation, 2003, p. 8.

26.

Harrison

The economics of World War II: six great powers in international comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 21.

27.

Symonds

CL.

The battle of Midway. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

28.

Çayırcı

Lütfü

Ö.

Modeling and simulation support to the defence planning process. J Defen Model Simul 2017; 14: 171–180.

29.

How does NATO apply instruments of power as it prepares for the possibility of conventional warfare against a peer adversary? Applying a “DIMEFIL” analysis. J Milit Hist Defen Stud 2021; 2: 132–148.