Retinocortical Gain in the Foveal Pathway: The Effect of Spatial Frequency and Stimulus Size

Abstract

The amplitude and the phase of the simultaneously recorded steady-state pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) were evaluated in humans as a function of the vertical diameter (D) of unidimensional Gabor stimuli. In the other dimension, parallel to the horizontal gratings, the patterns all had constant diameter (see Methods and Materials). Spatial frequencies (SFs) of 1 cycle per degree (cpd) and 5.3 cpd were counterphase modulated at a rate of 6.8 Hz. After off-line artifact rejection, the response was subject to Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT). Amplitude and phase of the first and second harmonics of both ERG and VEP were displayed for each SF and stimulus diameter.

Both ERG and VEP amplitude were found to increase as a function of D. Using trend analysis we found that ERG amplitude increased linearly as a function of D. VEP amplitude was found to be both linear and cubic, as a function of D. We calculated the ratio of VEP amplitude and ERG amplitude at each D and termed it retinocortical gain (G). G normalized to stimulus area was high for small D and decreased with D independently of SF. Unity gain occurred at stimulus sizes of 6° to 7°.

ERG phase was found to be more negative at 5.3 cpd than at 1 cpd. Although no significant difference was found between VEP phases at the two SFs tested, neither ERG nor VEP phase changed as a function of D.

The results suggest that retinocortical gain is highest for the foveally centered low spatial frequency small patch Gabors. The results provide support for the notion of the “foveal window” in human vision.

Keywords

Foveal Vision Pattern Electroretinogram Retinocortical Gain Spatial Summation Visual Evoked Potential

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Maffei

Fiorentini

Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 1981;211:953–954.

Otto

Bach

Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram. [in German]. Ophthalmologe 1997;94(3):217–221.

Regan

Sites of origin of visual evoked potential peaks. In: Regan

(ed). Human Brain Electrophysiology. New York: Elsevier; 1989; 429–435.

Baker

Hess

Linear and nonlinear components of human electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol 1984;51:952–967.

Brannan

Bodis-Wollner

Storch

Evidence for two distinct nonlinear components in the human pattern ERG. Vision Res 1992;32:11–17.

Hess

Baker

Jr.

Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol 1984;51:939–951.

Hess

Baker

Jr. Zrenner

Schwartzer

Differences between electroretinograms of cat and primate. J Neurophysiol 1986;56:747–768.

Boynton

Riggs

The effect of stimulus area and intensity upon the human retinal response. J Exper Psychol 1951;42:217–226.

Sakaue

Katsumi

Mehta

Hirose

Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:506–511.

10.

Brindley

Westheimer

The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram. J Physiol London 1965;179:518–537.

11.

Armington

The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation. Vision Res 1968;8:263–276.

12.

Hoekstra

van der Goot

DPJ

van den Brink

Bilsen

The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. Vision Res 1974;14:365–368.

13.

Gabor

Theory of communication. J EEEE 1946;3:429–456.

14.

Marcelja

Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am 1980;70(11):1297–1300.

15.

Prager

Saad

Schweitzer

Garcia

Arden

Electrode comparison in pattern electroretinography. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:816–819.

16.

Marx

Bodis-Wollner

Lustgarten

Podos

Electrophysiological evidence that early glaucoma affects foveal vision. Doc Ophthalmol 1987;67(3):281–301.

17.

Adachi-Usami

Murayama

Yamamoto

Electroretinograms and pattern visually evoked potentials in central areolar choroidal dystrophy. Doc Ophthalmol 1990;75:33–40.

18.

Ueda

Adachi-Usami

Assessment of central retinal function after successful retinal detachment surgery by pattern visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:482–485.

19.

DeValois

Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.

20.

Dacey

Physiology, morphology and spatial densities of identified ganglion cell types in primate retina. In: Goode

Morgan

(eds). Higher-Order Processing in the Visual System. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; 12–34.

21.

Curcio

Allen

. Topography of ganglion cells in the human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5–25.

22.

Azzopardi

Cowey

The overrepresentation of the fovea and adjacent retina in the striate cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque monkey. Neurosci 1996;72(3):627–639.

23.

Popovic

Sjöstrand

Resolution, separation of ganglion cells, and cortical magnification in humans. Vis Res 2001. In press.

24.

Savoy

McCann

Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles. J Opt Soc America 1975;65:343–350.

25.

Georgeson

Sullivan

Contrast constancy: Deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J Physiol London 1975;252:627–656.

26.

Polat

Norcia

Elongated physiological summation pools in the human visual cortex. Vis Res 1998;38:3735–3741.

27.

Polat

Mizobe

Pettet

Kasamatsu

Norcia

Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature 1998;391:580–584.

28.

Kulikowski

Limiting conditions of visual perception. [in Polish]. Prace Instytutu Automatkyi P.A.N. Warsaw 1969;77:1–133.

29.

Howell

Hess

The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings. Vis Res 1978;18:369–374.

30.

Findlay

A spatial integration effect in visual acuity. Vis Res 1969;9:157–166.

31.

Virsu

Rovamo

Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity and the cortical magnification factor. Exp Br Res 1979;37:475–496.

32.

Rovamo

Luntinen

Näsänen

Modeling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency. Vis Res 1993;33:2773–2788.

33.

Campbell

Maffei

Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the visual system. J Physiol London 1970;207:635–652.

34.

Bobak

Bodis-Wollner

Harnois

Thornton

VEPs in humans reveal high and low spatial contrast mechanisms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984;25:980–983.

35.

Bobak

Bodis-Wollner

Marx

Cortical contrast gain control in human spatial vision. J Physiol London 1988;405:421–437.

36.

Bodis-Wollner

Hendley

On the separability of two mechanisms involved in the detection of grating patterns in humans. J Physiol London 1979;291:251–263.