Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) were assessed in 60 participants during 4 mental states described in traditional yoga texts. These 4 mental states are random thinking, nonmeditative-focused thinking, meditative focusing, and meditation. Assessments were made before (5 minutes), during (20 minutes), and after (5 minutes) each of the 4 states, on 4 separate days. There were prolonged latencies of 2 MLAEPs components, the Na and Pa waves during meditation (P < .05, post hoc analyses following analysis of variance [ANOVA]), suggesting that auditory information transmission at the level of the medial geniculate and primary auditory cortex (ie, the neural generators corresponding to the Na and Pa waves) was delayed. Hence, meditation influenced MLAEPs, while meditative focusing did not.
TellesSNagarathnaRNagendraHRDesirajuT. Alterations in auditory middle latency evoked potentials during meditation on a meaningful symbol—‘Om.’Int J Neurosci. 1994;76(1-2):87–93.
2.
WoodsDLClayworthCC. Age-related changes in human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;65(4):297–303.
3.
TellesSJosephCVenkateshSDesirajuT. Alteration of auditory middle latency evoked potentials during yogic consciously regulated breathing and attentive state of mind. Int J Psychophysiol. 1993;14(3):189–198.
4.
TellesSDesirajuT. Recording of auditory middle latency evoked potentials during the practice of meditation with the syllable ‘OM.’Indian J Med Res. 1993;98:237–239.
5.
MalhotraA. Auditory Evoked Response in Clinical Practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
6.
Liégeois-ChauvelCMusolinoABadierJMMarquisPChauvelP. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;92(3):204–214.
7.
DeiberMPIbañezVFischerCPerrinFMauguièreF. Sequential mapping favours the hypothesis of distinct generators for Na and Pa middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;71(3):187–197.
8.
EhlersMD. Activity level controls postsynaptic composition and signaling via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(3):231–242.
9.
TellesSNaveenKV. Changes in middle latency auditory evoked potentials during meditation. Psychol Rep. 2004;94(2):398–400.
10.
PanjwaniUSelvamurthyWSinghSHGuptaHLMukhopadhyaySThakurL. Effect of Sahaja yoga meditation on auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and visual contrast sensitivity (VCS) in epileptics. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2000;25(1):1–12.
11.
DeviNM. Sahaja Yoga: A Beginner's Guide. Bombay, India: Vishwa Nirwala Dharma; 2006.
12.
KumarSNagendraHNaveenKManjunathNTellesS. Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states. Int J Yoga. 2010;3(2):37–41.
13.
TaiminiIK. The Science of Yoga. Madras, India: The Theosophical Publishing House; 1986.
YadavATandonOPVaneyN. Auditory evoked responses during different phases of menstrual cycle. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2002;46(4):449–456.
17.
JasperHH. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International federation. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1958;10(2):371–375.
18.
MorletDBertrandOSalordFBoulieuRPernierJFischerC. Dynamics of MLAEP changes in midazolam-induced sedation. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(5):437–446.
19.
SubramanyaPTellesS. Changes in midlatency auditory evoked potentials following two yoga-based relaxation techniques. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009;40(3):190–195.
20.
StreeterCCJensenJEPerlmutterRM. Yoga Asana sessions increase brain GABA levels: a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(4):419–426.
21.
KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM. Principles of Neural Science. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
22.
StreeterCCWhitfieldTHOwenL. Effects of yoga versus walking on mood, anxiety, and brain GABA levels: a randomized controlled MRS study. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(11):1145–1152.
23.
SetićMDomijanD. Modeling the top-down influences on the lateral interactions in the visual cortex. Brain Res. 2008;1225:86–101.
24.
EricksonKIPrakashRSKimJSSuttonBPColcombeSJKramerAF. Top-down attentional control in spatially coincident stimuli enhances activity in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant regions of cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2009;197(1):186–197.
