Previous studies showed a global reduction of the event-related potential component N100 in patients with schizophrenia, a phenomenon that is even more pronounced during auditory verbal hallucinations. This reduction assumingly results from dysfunctional activation of the primary auditory cortex by inner speech, which reduces its responsiveness to external stimuli. With this study, we tested the feasibility of enhancing the responsiveness of the primary auditory cortex to external stimuli with an upregulation of the event-related potential component N100 in healthy control subjects. A total of 15 healthy subjects performed 8 double-sessions of EEG-neurofeedback training over 2 weeks. The results of the used linear mixed effect model showed a significant active learning effect within sessions (t = 5.99, P < .001) against an unspecific habituation effect that lowered the N100 amplitude over time. Across sessions, a significant increase in the passive condition (t = 2.42, P = .03), named as carry-over effect, was observed. Given that the carry-over effect is one of the ultimate aims of neurofeedback, it seems reasonable to apply this neurofeedback training protocol to influence the N100 amplitude in patients with schizophrenia. This intervention could provide an alternative treatment option for auditory verbal hallucinations in these patients.
ShergillSSMurrayRMMcGuirePK.Auditory hallucinations: a review of psychological treatments. Schizophr Res. 1998;32:137-150.
2.
LincolnT.Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie in der Schizophrenie—Ein individuenzentrierter Ansatz. 2nd ed.Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2014.
3.
KindlerJHomanPFluryRStrikWDierksTHublD.Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations: results of a randomized controlled study. Psychiatry Res. 2013;209:114-117.
4.
SommerIESlotemaCWDaskalakisZJDerksEMBlomJDvan der GaagM.The treatment of hallucinations in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:704-714.
5.
BrunelinJMondinoMGassabL. Examining transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for hallucinations in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:719-724. Erratum in: Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:1321.
6.
HomanPKindlerJFederspielA. Muting the voice: a case of arterial spin labeling-monitored transcranial direct current stimulation treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:853-854.
7.
HomanPKindlerJHaufMWaltherSHublDDierksT.Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in the left superior temporal gyrus reveal tonic hyperactivity in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations: a possible trait marker. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:304.
8.
HublDDierksT.Curtailing the voices and the need for predictors. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:933-934.
9.
Ćurčić-BlakeBFordJMHublD. Interaction of language, auditory and memory brain networks in auditory verbal hallucinations. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;148:1-20.
10.
UpthegroveRBroomeMRCaldwellKIvesJOyebodeFWoodSJ.Understanding auditory verbal hallucinations: a systematic review of current evidence. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016;133:352-367.
11.
WatersFABadcockJCMichiePTMayberyMT.Auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: intrusive thoughts and forgotten memories. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2006;11:65-83.
12.
AllenPModinosGHublD. Neuroimaging auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: from neuroanatomy to neurochemistry and beyond. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:695-703.
13.
HublDKoenigTStrikWKGarciaLMDierksT.Competition for neuronal resources: how hallucinations make themselves heard. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:57-62.
14.
McGuirePKSilbersweigDAWrightI. Abnormal monitoring of inner speech: a physiological basis for auditory hallucinations. Lancet. 1995;346:596-600.
15.
MoseleyPFernyhoughCEllisonA.Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:2794-2805.
16.
TracyDKShergillSS.Mechanisms underlying auditory hallucinations—understanding perception without stimulus. Brain Sci. 2013;3:642-669.
17.
DyckMSMathiakKABergertS. Targeting treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia with fMRI-based neurofeedback—exploring different cases of schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:37.
18.
DierksTLindenDEJandlM. Activation of Heschl’s gyrus during auditory hallucinations. Neuron. 1999;22:615-621.
SaletuBItilTMSaletuM.Auditory evoked response, EEG, and thought process in schizophrenics. Am J Psychiatry. 1971;128:336-344.
21.
FordJMMathalonDHKalbaSMarshLPfefferbaumA.N1 and P300 abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia, epilepsy, and epilepsy with schizophrenialike features. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;49:848-860.
22.
FordJMRoachBJPalzesVAMathalonDH.Using concurrent EEG and fMRI to probe the state of the brain in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:429-441.
23.
MulertCGallinatJPascual-MarquiR. Reduced event-related current density in the anterior cingulate cortex in schizophrenia. Neuroimage. 2001;13:589-600.
24.
MulertCSeifertCLeichtG. Single-trial coupling of EEG and fMRI reveals the involvement of early anterior cingulate cortex activation in effortful decision making. Neuroimage. 2008;42:158-168.
25.
FordJMMathalonDHKalbaSWhitfieldSFaustmanWORothWT.Cortical responsiveness during inner speech in schizophrenia: an event-related potential study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1914-1916.
26.
NäätänenRPictonT.The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987;24:375-425.
27.
DelbWStraussDJLowYF. Alterations in event related potentials (ERP) associated with tinnitus distress and attention. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2008;33:211-221.
28.
RosburgTSorosP.The response decrease of auditory evoked potentials by repeated stimulation—is there evidence for an interplay between habituation and sensitization?Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:397-408.
29.
Diaz HernandezLRiegerKBaenningerABrandeisDKoenigT. Towards using microstate-neurofeedback for the treatment of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia. A feasibility study in healthy participants. Brain Topogr. 2016;29:308-321.
30.
GruzelierJH.EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. III: a review of methodological and theoretical considerations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;44:159-182.
31.
McCarthy-JonesS.Taking back the brain: could neurofeedback training be effective for relieving distressing auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia?Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:678-682.
32.
RosTBaarsBJLaniusRAVuilleumierP.Tuning pathological brain oscillations with neurofeedback: a systems neuroscience framework. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1008.
33.
StrehlU.What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:894.
34.
VernonDJ.Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? An evaluation of the evidence with implications for future research. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30:347-364.
35.
ArnsMHeinrichHStrehlU.Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol. 2014;95:108-115.
36.
SchoenbergPLDavidAS.Biofeedback for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2014;39:109-135.
37.
CordesJSMathiakKADyckM. Cognitive and neural strategies during control of the anterior cingulate cortex by fMRI neurofeedback in patients with schizophrenia. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:169.
38.
GruzelierJHardmanEWildJZamanR.Learned control of slow potential interhemispheric asymmetry in schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol. 1999;34:341-348.
39.
RuizSBirbaumerNSitaramR.Abnormal neural connectivity in schizophrenia and fMRI-brain-computer interface as a potential therapeutic approach. Front Psychiatry. 2013;4:17.
40.
BusseMLowYFCorona-StraussFIDelbWStraussDJ.Neurofeedback by neural correlates of auditory selective attention as possible application for tinnitus therapies. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5136-5139.
41.
HallerSBirbaumerNVeitR.Real-time fMRI feedback training may improve chronic tinnitus. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:696-703.
42.
GruzelierJH.EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: a review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;44:124-141.
43.
OldfieldRC.The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97-113.
44.
DerogatisLRMelisaratosN.The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983;13:595-605.
45.
KernRSNuechterleinKHGreenMF. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:214-220.
46.
NuechterleinKHGreenMFKernRS. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:203-213.
DelormeASejnowskiTMakeigS.Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage. 2007;34:1443-1449.
49.
PeirceJW.PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;162:8-13.
50.
EdgarJCHanlonFMHuangMX. Superior temporal gyrus spectral abnormalities in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology. 2008;45:812-824.
51.
WuKYChaoCWHungCIChenWHChenYTLiangSF.Functional abnormalities in the cortical processing of sound complexity and musical consonance in schizophrenia: evidence from an evoked potential study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:158.
52.
TimmJSanMiguelISaupeKSchrögerE.The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention. BMC Neurosci. 2013;14:2.
53.
HinkRFHillyardSABensonPJ.Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to acoustic and phonetic cues. Biol Psychol. 1978;6:1-16.
54.
FittsPM.Perceptual-motor skill learning. In: MeltonMA, ed. Categories of Human Learning. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1964, 243-285.
LacroixJM.Mechanisms of biofeedback control. In: DavidsonRJSchwartzGEShapiroD, eds. Consciousness and Self-Regulation. New York, NY: Plenum; 1986:137-162.
57.
Heinks-MaldonadoTHMathalonDHHoudeJFGrayMFaustmanWOFordJM.Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:286-296.
58.
SlotemaCWAlemanADaskalakisZJSommerIE.Meta-analysis of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations: update and effects after one month. Schizophr Res. 2012;142:40-45.
59.
SurmeliTErtemAEralpEKosIH.Schizophrenia and the efficacy of qEEG-guided neurofeedback treatment: a clinical case series. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012;43:133-144.
